![]() |
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: You can't seem to get through your own fantasies, Brain... Any fantasy of mine cannot influence your ability to string together a sentence. Why would I want to "string together a sentence" based on any fantasy of yours, Brain? You're a discredited liar. I have no desire to emulate that. I stand corrected. I should have said, "...your inability..." I don't think you were paying attention, Brain...(Like THAT'S new...) Such baseless accusations (lies) you're always making. It's not baseless. IE: Unlicesed Devices, ARES, MARS, Lawful Operating from Foreign Soil, etc. You've been proven wrong on every single one. Yet we're talking about What Christy has written, and you've been shown to be wrong. Again. Nope. ... Re-read what was written...Lennie will NOT be pleased...(Like THAT'S new either!!!) Steve, K4YZ Pull your head out and re-read it yourself. You won't be pleased. Nothing to re-read. Yuo got it wrong. Now you've gotten it wrong twice. I asked for clarification. Christy gave it. You're wrong. No, I'm not. ... Christy said that the longer the reply, the more likely it is that the original opinion was correct. Uh huh. I say Lennie's an idiot. It's not about you. It's about what Christy said that would please Len. Too bad for you. Too bad I was right? Why? ... QUOTE: On 31 May 2005 15:40:05 -0700, bb wrote: Christy D wrote: On Tue, 31 May 2005 12:07:05 GMT, Kim wrote: [102 lines snipped] The correctness of the original opinion is directly proportional to the length of the attempted rebuttal. inversely proportional? No. The longer the rebuttal attempt, the more likely it is that the original opinion was correct. Hence the direct proportionality. UNQUOTE Sorry, Brain...You've screwed the pooch...Again... "Screwed the pooch?" It that a marine corps thing? And why can't you explain why you posted my street address on RRAP? |
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: No. The longer the rebuttal attempt, the more likely it is that the original opinion was correct. Hence the direct proportionality. Sorry, Brain...You've screwed the pooch...Again... "Screwed the pooch?" It that a marine corps thing? Marine Corps is capitalized, just like Air Force, Brain... And why can't you explain why you posted my street address on RRAP? I didn't post your "street address" on RRAP, Brain... A street address consists of a house number, apartment or suite if applicable, and the name or number of the street. EG: 151 12th Avenue Northwest. That is a "street address, albeit not a complete "mailing address". A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address is the last line if different from the originating address. I'd think after having been deployed overseas and, I assume, having mailed things home before that you'd kow this bit of information. So...you want to try again...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
"K4YZ" wrote A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address is the last line if different from the originating address. Thank you, Captain Obvious. Perhaps that information was useful to someone. Out in the barn. dit dit de Hans, K0HB |
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: No. The longer the rebuttal attempt, the more likely it is that the original opinion was correct. Hence the direct proportionality. Sorry, Brain...You've screwed the pooch...Again... "Screwed the pooch?" It that a marine corps thing? Marine Corps is capitalized, just like Air Force, Brain... Who could tell? You usually capitalize every other word. And why can't you explain why you posted my street address on RRAP? I didn't post your "street address" on RRAP, Brain... A street address consists of a house number, apartment or suite if applicable, and the name or number of the street. EG: 151 12th Avenue Northwest. That is a "street address, albeit not a complete "mailing address". A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address is the last line if different from the originating address. I'd think after having been deployed overseas and, I assume, having mailed things home before that you'd kow this bit of information. So...you want to try again...?!?! Steve, K4YZ "Lessee....430" What was that supposed to mean? Why must you dodge? Why must you use weasle words? Why can't you answer the question? |
K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address is the last line if different from the originating address. Thank you, Captain Obvious. Perhaps that information was useful to someo= ne. Out in the barn. dit dit de Hans, K0HB Steve won't answer my question, won't "educate" me. Steve won't say what he meant by "Lessee....430." Steve dodges. Steve won't be a "man" about it and accept responsibility for his actions. It's like he's anonymous WRT "Lessee....430." =20 Steve fears something. |
bb wrote: wrote: From: "bb" on Fri 3 Jun 2005 03:51 wrote: From: bb on Jun 2, 6:27 pm K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: Christy said that the longer the reply, the more likely it is that the original opinion was correct. "Christy," singing like a New Minstrel, might belong to that irritated group that gets tired tracing out more than 50 words with their finger... :-) Who's to say? I know...:-) But, we have the solitary tomb sentinel busy "guarding" the territory for ANY opinions other than his own. We are stuck with the Avenging Angle of Dearth. Ho hum. Eventually the "pop" will be an artery and he will become the usual vegetable garden typical to stroke victims. We will be able to see that while we are still alive. :-) That is going to put a damper on his Class A behavior and incessant machismo attitude of always "being right" (in his own mind). His stress is building. Tsk. Notice how the coward won't explain what he meant by "Lessee...430." I need to start tabulating the dodges like the time I kept track of his new lies for three weeks. None of those added up to "1". You claimed there were lies present, but never substantiated a single claim. So start in on this if you'd care to...It will just keep you from bothering others. Len has long replies. Sometimes really, really long replies. Do you want to argue that, too? The Avenging Angle of Dearth will ARGUE-FIGHT-INSULT anything I write in here. :-) I tire of Steve's incessant lying. I tire of his peers always giving him a pass on his tirades. They're all a pretty useless assembly of Extras. Understand fully. They aren't ever going to be role models of anything they way they act and posture in here. Steven J. Robeson has soiled his father's name. No, I've not. However YOU have a lot of explaining to do to your Son and Spouse. Documented. Archived. Steve, K4YZ |
From: "bb" on Sat 4 Jun 2005 05:54
wrote: From: "bb" on Fri 3 Jun 2005 03:51 wrote: From: bb on Jun 2, 6:27 pm K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: I know...:-) But, we have the solitary tomb sentinel busy "guarding" the territory for ANY opinions other than his own. We are stuck with the Avenging Angle of Dearth. Ho hum. Eventually the "pop" will be an artery and he will become the usual vegetable garden typical to stroke victims. We will be able to see that while we are still alive. :-) That is going to put a damper on his Class A behavior and incessant machismo attitude of always "being right" (in his own mind). His stress is building. Tsk. Notice how the coward won't explain what he meant by "Lessee...430." I need to start tabulating the dodges like the time I kept track of his new lies for three weeks. Well, don't expect him to change any time soon. He's tried the same thing with me (10048 being my house number) except that my entire mailing address has been printed in HR in every article (common procedure in amateur radio periodicals). The solitary tomb sentinel has an ugly habit of bullying others to "gain supremacy" or something similar. He can do so in relative "safety" from the time-distance isolation of this medium. Bullies take advantage of that "protection" (and usually act a lot "tougher") but all it shows is ordinary cowardice. I tire of Steve's incessant lying. I tire of his peers always giving him a pass on his tirades. They're all a pretty useless assembly of Extras. Understand fully. They aren't ever going to be role models of anything they way they act and posture in here. Steven J. Robeson has soiled his father's name. Yes, and probably soiled his pants on encountering some who don't feel threatened by his bullying machismo. :-) way too overworked over their hobby discussions. When he found a couple of radio amateurs engaged in a heated argument he would listen a minute or so, then casually interrupt with "Say, did you know that ham is the butchered meat of swine?" The arguers would be momentarily stunned. He would grin slightly and amble away, the grin growing. He had the right Careful, now. You might upset the mighty machismo morsemen, especially "Jimmy the Riveter." Heh heh heh. I'm not worried about Jimmie. He gets upset so easily, thinks I am "calling him names." Tsk, tsk. I've called him all sorts of names: James, Jim, Jimmy, Jimmie, James Miccolis, and just Miccolis. He feels so "insulted" now about being called all those NAMES that he just wastes everyone's time. Ham radio has certainly changed since I first heard about it back in the 40s. So many uptight folks in it now, so easily bruised, some wanting to bully, terrorize, and FIGHT! :-) |
wrote: From: "bb" on Sat 4 Jun 2005 05:54 wrote: From: "bb" on Fri 3 Jun 2005 03:51 wrote: From: bb on Jun 2, 6:27 pm K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: I know...:-) But, we have the solitary tomb sentinel busy "guarding" the territory for ANY opinions other than his own. We are stuck with the Avenging Angle of Dearth. Ho hum. Eventually the "pop" will be an artery and he will become the usual vegetable garden typical to stroke victims. We will be able to see that while we are still alive. :-) That is going to put a damper on his Class A behavior and incessant machismo attitude of always "being right" (in his own mind). His stress is building. Tsk. Notice how the coward won't explain what he meant by "Lessee...430." I need to start tabulating the dodges like the time I kept track of his new lies for three weeks. Well, don't expect him to change any time soon. He's tried the same thing with me (10048 being my house number) except that my entire mailing address has been printed in HR in every article (common procedure in amateur radio periodicals). The solitary tomb sentinel has an ugly habit of bullying others to "gain supremacy" or something similar. He can do so in relative "safety" from the time-distance isolation of this medium. Bullies take advantage of that "protection" (and usually act a lot "tougher") but all it shows is ordinary cowardice. I tire of Steve's incessant lying. I tire of his peers always giving him a pass on his tirades. They're all a pretty useless assembly of Extras. Understand fully. They aren't ever going to be role models of anything they way they act and posture in here. Steven J. Robeson has soiled his father's name. Yes, and probably soiled his pants on encountering some who don't feel threatened by his bullying machismo. :-) way too overworked over their hobby discussions. When he found a couple of radio amateurs engaged in a heated argument he would listen a minute or so, then casually interrupt with "Say, did you know that ham is the butchered meat of swine?" The arguers would be momentarily stunned. He would grin slightly and amble away, the grin growing. He had the right Careful, now. You might upset the mighty machismo morsemen, especially "Jimmy the Riveter." Heh heh heh. I'm not worried about Jimmie. He gets upset so easily, thinks I am "calling him names." Tsk, tsk. I've called him all sorts of names: James, Jim, Jimmy, Jimmie, James Miccolis, and just Miccolis. He feels so "insulted" now about being called all those NAMES that he just wastes everyone's time. Ham radio has certainly changed since I first heard about it back in the 40s. So many uptight folks in it now, so easily bruised, some wanting to bully, terrorize, and FIGHT! :-) These are certainly not the good people that I first met when I became a ham. The trouble with amateur radio started with the advent of the no-code license. People began entering the service that did not worship at the altar of St. Hiram, and did not kneel and kisst the feet of Extras. |
bb wrote: wrote: Ham radio has certainly changed since I first heard about it back in the 40s. So many uptight folks in it now, so easily bruised, some wanting to bully, terrorize, and FIGHT! Perhaps, Lennie, if certain mischevious scumbags weren't looking to "bruise" people there wouldn't be such a propensity to be as defensive. Such as the deceitful and misleading barbs YOU disseminate in this forum. Guess you now think it's wrong for one to defend one's self? These are certainly not the good people that I first met when I became a ham. The trouble with amateur radio started with the advent of the no-code license. People began entering the service that did not worship at the altar of St. Hiram, and did not kneel and kisst the feet of Extras. The problem didn't start with the No Code test...It started almost 20 years before that with the influx of 11 meter operators via the Bash Book route and the subsequent codification of the "open pools". Steve, K4YZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com