Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)? It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in nature way back in the early 60s. Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments? And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode. Dan/W4NTI If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW used most often? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bb wrote:
Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message groups.com... Dee Flint wrote: I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)? It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in nature way back in the early 60s. Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments? And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode. Dan/W4NTI If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW used most often? It is used, "bb", but ops are attempting to maximize score by working everyone, even those not using CW. I switch modes quite often during the course of a VHF/UHF contest. During heavy aurora, CW works much better than SSB. I'd have thought you'd have already known it. Dave K8MN |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Heil" wrote in message ink.net... bb wrote: Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... Dee Flint wrote: I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)? It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in nature way back in the early 60s. Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments? And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode. Dan/W4NTI If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW used most often? It is used, "bb", but ops are attempting to maximize score by working everyone, even those not using CW. I switch modes quite often during the course of a VHF/UHF contest. During heavy aurora, CW works much better than SSB. I'd have thought you'd have already known it. Dave K8MN In one case the other station wasn't hearing me through the pile up (SSB) so I switched to CW and threw in the call sign. He immediately called for me (in voice) so I switched back to voice to do the contact. Worked pretty slick. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: bb wrote: Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message groups.com... Dee Flint wrote: I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)? It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in nature way back in the early 60s. Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments? And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode. Dan/W4NTI If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW used most often? It is used, "bb", but ops are attempting to maximize score by working everyone, even those not using CW. I switch modes quite often during the course of a VHF/UHF contest. During heavy aurora, CW works much better than SSB. I'd have thought you'd have already known it. Dave K8MN Dee made it sound like Extras were working Extras on SSB. I guess it wasn't at all like Dee claimed. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bb" wrote in message oups.com... Dave Heil wrote: bb wrote: Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message groups.com... Dee Flint wrote: I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)? It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in nature way back in the early 60s. Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments? And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode. Dan/W4NTI If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW used most often? It is used, "bb", but ops are attempting to maximize score by working everyone, even those not using CW. I switch modes quite often during the course of a VHF/UHF contest. During heavy aurora, CW works much better than SSB. I'd have thought you'd have already known it. Dave K8MN Dee made it sound like Extras were working Extras on SSB. I guess it wasn't at all like Dee claimed. You read way too much into the original post. I didn't mention mode. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: "bb" wrote in message oups.com... Dave Heil wrote: bb wrote: Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message groups.com... Dee Flint wrote: I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)? It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in nature way back in the early 60s. Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments? And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode. Dan/W4NTI If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW used most often? It is used, "bb", but ops are attempting to maximize score by working everyone, even those not using CW. I switch modes quite often during the course of a VHF/UHF contest. During heavy aurora, CW works much better than SSB. I'd have thought you'd have already known it. Dave K8MN Dee made it sound like Extras were working Extras on SSB. I guess it wasn't at all like Dee claimed. You read way too much into the original post. I didn't mention mode. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE You're correct. Dan claimed the mode most often used was SSB, not you. So, in the interest of accuracy, can you give a breakout by mode and by class? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Heil" wrote in message ink.net... bb wrote: Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... Dee Flint wrote: I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)? It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in nature way back in the early 60s. Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments? And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode. Dan/W4NTI If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW used most often? It is used, "bb", but ops are attempting to maximize score by working everyone, even those not using CW. I switch modes quite often during the course of a VHF/UHF contest. During heavy aurora, CW works much better than SSB. I'd have thought you'd have already known it. Dave K8MN Correct.....in fact I see CW activity INCREASING on VHF. At least 6 meters, which is all I have running, right now. Years ago it was nearly impossible to get a CW contact on VHF. In fact a lot of rigs, homebrew and/or commercial didn't even have a key jack in them. I like seeing CW on VHF. I do like everyone else does, if their trying to maximize QSO's, contest or otherwise. Both modes. Dan/W4NTI |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bb" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)? It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in nature way back in the early 60s. Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments? And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode. Dan/W4NTI If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW used most often? How do you know it wasn't/isn't? I worked a fair number of stations on CW in that contest. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: "bb" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)? It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in nature way back in the early 60s. Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments? And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode. Dan/W4NTI If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW used most often? How do you know it wasn't/isn't? I worked a fair number of stations on CW in that contest. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE I only know what you told us. Extra's working Extras on SSB. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: "bb" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)? It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in nature way back in the early 60s. Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments? And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode. Dan/W4NTI If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW used most often? How do you know it wasn't/isn't? I worked a fair number of stations on CW in that contest. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Because Dan said, "And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode." Was Dan wrong? You know, you and David Heil K8MN ought to let Dan answer the questions that I asked of Dan instead of jumping in here and getting it wrong. Best of Luck. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Policy discussion? | Policy | |||
Any one recommend a group where they discuss policy? | Policy |