Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bb" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)? It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in nature way back in the early 60s. Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments? And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode. Dan/W4NTI If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW used most often? No I have not commented on anything with the FCC other than BPL and sending in reports about K1MAN. I figured out a long time ago the FCC was basically a lap dog of the ARRL when it comes to dumbing down of the license structure. And my pitiful input wasn't going to have any affect at all. So "bb".....does that blow your mind, or what? Dan/W4NTI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Policy discussion? | Policy | |||
Any one recommend a group where they discuss policy? | Policy |