Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bb" wrote in message ups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ink.net... My attitude toward many of the current crop of new techs is one bathed upon five years observation, since returning to the U.S. I haven't chased them anywhere. In fact, it has been just the opposite. I've tried to encourage them to use simplex on FM. I've tried to encourage them to try 6 meters along with 432 and 144 MHz SSB and CW. I can't be faulted that they don't act after being encouraged. If these folks are, in fact "trapped" in a world of 2m only FM repeater operation, they have fashioned the trap themselves by not being more curious about the rest of VHF/UHF amateur radio. There are avenues open to them but they aren't participating. Dave K8MN Man does that say it all in a well articulated paragraph. Valid points out there in tech land. Indeed it does. David has articulated, and Dan has agreed that a Tech really isn't worth much as an amateur if they don't do the things that Dave, Dan and Dee want them to be doing. I'm sure that your attitudes spill over into your communication with those unworthy Techs. Not only a Dip****, but a dumbass as well, eh N0IMD? Just keep making up what you want. The FCC wants the Technician to UPGRADE. So do we......whats wrong with that? Dip****/Dumbass The Technician ticket originally was envisioned to enable those that had a technical slant that needed a place to play on the "air". It has degenerated into a defacto "entry level" to present day Ham Radio. What a bummer. Degenerated? Dan, I'd like to introduce you to the FCC sometime. It was the FCC that turned the Technician license into your disdained entry level to present day "Ham Radio." Sure was.....and the FCC has degenerated into a home for Lawyers sucking on the Federal tit. Got a problem with that? Truth is truth. The FCC makes the rules...yep they do. And they haven't a clue. Yep thats true too. Argue that one. I bet a lot of those out there don't know that the original Tech written was exactly the same as the General. The ONLY difference was the General had a 13 WPM cw test. Send and Receive. And the Tech had a 5wpm......and was available by mail. Dan/W4NTI Thanks for the insight into the "Mind of Dan." Just tellin the truth and you cain't stand it. Dan/W4NTI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan/W4NTI wrote: The FCC wants the Technician to UPGRADE. So do we......whats wrong with that? Dip****/Dumbass Perhaps the FCC should sent out invitations to upgrade if they want so desperately for it to happen. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "Dan/W4NTI" on Sun 19 Jun 2005 22:36
"bb" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message Indeed it does. David has articulated, and Dan has agreed that a Tech really isn't worth much as an amateur if they don't do the things that Dave, Dan and Dee want them to be doing. I'm sure that your attitudes spill over into your communication with those unworthy Techs. Not only a Dip****, but a dumbass as well, eh N0IMD? Just keep making up what you want. The FCC wants the Technician to UPGRADE. So do we......whats wrong with that? Dip****/Dumbass Plenty WRONG, "dip**** dumbass Dan." FCC did NOT "want anyone" to do anything but obey the law. Here's a clue, you southern-fried Einstein: FCC is NOT in ANY position to endorse or motivate any radio amateur. They aren't charterd by Congress to do so. "Wanting anyone to upgrade" is a subject for clubs and private organizations. Mostly that means the ARRL. Here's another clue: The ARRL does NOT regulate U.S. amateur radio...regardless of what they infer. Sunnuvagun! [thank you Hans for originating that into the mainstream of American colloquialisms over a century or so back... :-) ] Thanks for the insight into the "Mind of Dan." Just tellin the truth and you cain't stand it. Tsk, dip**** dumbass Dan, the southern-fried Einstein (wannabe). Good luck with that now... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Policy discussion? | Policy | |||
Any one recommend a group where they discuss policy? | Policy |