Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote:
K=D8HB wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote Who do ya want - a impatient knob twiddler with a FTDX 9000 and an antenna farm of (insert your favorite antenna here), or a good capable contester with say a dipole and an IC-746. Your example is specious, Mike. Generally the contester who builds= a competition grade station has also invested in building the skills and techniques to take advantage of the capabilities they have sought in their station design. Do you think so Hans? I have examples of just that, and it has been my personal experience. Your statement is true as far as it goes, but I've seen what happens when the newbies have access to the competition grade setups, as sometimes happens during events such as Field day The difference is that they didn't build that station themselves. So many of the newbies I have worked with come in with the expectations of sitting down, throwing the tuning knob around, and calling, then waiting for the pileup. They get frustrated with the work that you have to put into the more modest setups. I think one of the main purposes of FD is that sort of education. Let folks try out new (to them) rigs, new antennas, operating techniques, etc., and see what *really* works. And let the newbies see how it's done. Many times we are told that the station "isn't working". And of course it is. Cockpit trouble. Short-circuit between the headphones. An experienced and patient operator can start making QSO's immediately. One of the newbies decided that he wanted to use the QRO station and referred to the GOTA as a "toy station". "younger and more capable minds".... I've had similar experiences on FD. Some folks think they're doing well to make QSOs on SSB at a certain rate with a beam and 100 W transceiver, with an op and a logger. Exhausted after an hour or two, they wander over to the CW tent and find me working them at 2, 3 or more times their rate, with a dipole, "old" transceiver, and no logger. The reactions when presented with a manual transmatch were priceless, too. Those QRO stations are powerful competition for lower powered ones. It is not terribly difficult to twiddle the knob, start calling CQ, and getting return calls. Problem is, it doesn't tend to make you a good co= ntester. That's why it might be a good idea - next year - to run all ~100 W setups. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Policy discussion? | Policy | |||
Any one recommend a group where they discuss policy? | Policy |