an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "an_old_friend" - Find messages by this
author
Date: 22 Jun 2005 02:48:44 -0700
Local: Wed,Jun 22 2005 5:48 am
Subject: The Pool
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse

sorryJim but failing to back up an opinion doesn't mean they can't, may
mean they simply choose not to bother


verbage edited



) In other words, you refuse to answer.

No I was just cuting out some of your drivel but then I adknowledge
when I make cuts and don't disport the context of a persons remark,
unlike yourself


Failing to "back up an opinion", Markie, means that either the
author was wrong, didn't have the facts, shot their mouth off just to
be heard or doesn't have the faith of conviction in his/her own beliefs
to stand behind it.

you are simply wrong a common enough problem for you as I recall.
Indeed there are other reason



) Indeed WHAT "

as I go to say but you missed the point try reading it if you can


other reason..." ?!?!
an example I think Ham Radio would better off if Morse encoded CW were
in fact banned. I have reasons to belive that but i know they will not
convince you or Jim, or any Procoder. so why waste the bandwidth my
failure does not mean I don't have them


) You'd "ban" the simpliest, easiest to emit mode simply because
)you're too lazy to do it...

Lier I said and have said many times I think wewould better off banning
the mode, never said I would do if I had the power

) That's the epitome of selfish!

No you are the epitome of paranoid



MY OPINION is that you need to move back to Illinois and marry
Todd Daugherty, N9OGL. Maybe Lennie would move back (he's originally
from IL) and officiate for you? You two are cut from the same
cloth...Hmmmmmmmm...maybe a bit TOO close...Forget what I said...He's
probably in your bloodline and that would be incest.

you can can hold any opinion you like but you are likely nuts thinking
I would marry someone i have never met



) Considering some of the TRULY nutsy things you've said and done
)before, Markie, NOTHING involving you strikes me as "nuts".

I guess then you think I am quite sane or are truely ****ed up in the
head, most likely the later


Besides it would be bigamy i guess you missed my mentioning my marrage


No...You "mentioned" you were building a house.

Lier i mentioned it long ago in your stalkng phase Stevie boy


BTW I don't intend to answer wether I married a man or a women simply
because it is none of your busness


) As if anyone here would care...?!?!

You obvisly care a great deal about what I do with my genital and who I
do that with

)BBBBWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHAHAH=AD)AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH=ADAHAHAHA=
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH=ADAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHA

! ! ! ! ! ! !



BTW it is also nuts of you to suggest I prefrom an act impossible in
the of Illinois


) The only things I consider as "impossible" are (1) Lennie ever
)doing what he said he would and (2) you ever gaining proficiency in
the
)English language above the second grade level.

In not adknowleding the realities of the law you prove yourself a
Sociiopath meeting the textbook meaning it is impossible for 2 guy to
marry in Illinois simple fact

Further I am certian you are liing in saying those are the only things
that are impossible that or plain mentaly ill. Or both of course. Which
is it?

)Steve, K4YZ

an_old_friend wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "an_old_friend" - Find messages by this
author
Date: 22 Jun 2005 02:48:44 -0700
Local: Wed,Jun 22 2005 5:48 am
Subject: The Pool
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse

sorryJim but failing to back up an opinion doesn't mean they can't, m=
ay
mean they simply choose not to bother


verbage edited
) In other words, you refuse to answer.

No I was just cuting out some of your drivel but then I adknowledge
when I make cuts and don't disport the context of a persons remark,
unlike yourself

There was no "drivvel" to cut.

Failing to "back up an opinion", Markie, means that either the
author was wrong, didn't have the facts, shot their mouth off just to
be heard or doesn't have the faith of conviction in his/her own belie=
fs
to stand behind it.

you are simply wrong a common enough problem for you as I recall.
Indeed there are other reason

I was not wrong.

There are no reasons other than those cited.

) Indeed WHAT "

as I go to say but you missed the point try reading it if you can

Reading YOUR drivvle is the problem, Markie. You're functiaonlly
illiterate and hide behind as many multisyllable words as you can,
whether you used them correctly or not.

other reason..." ?!?!
an example I think Ham Radio would better off if Morse encoded CW were
in fact banned. I have reasons to belive that but i know they will not
convince you or Jim, or any Procoder. so why waste the bandwidth my
failure does not mean I don't have them

) You'd "ban" the simpliest, easiest to emit mode simply because
)you're too lazy to do it...

Lier

Markie...you and I went throught he drill with you and "lier"
before...Your change of residence does nothing to change that.

I said and have said many times I think wewould better off banning
the mode, never said I would do if I had the power

Sure you have.

On occassions too numerous to count.

) That's the epitome of selfish!

No you are the epitome of paranoid

I'm not paranoid at all. But you are still selfish. Your
suggestions, ideas and other "recommendations" for the Amateur Radio
service hinge on nothing more than your inadequacies in it yourself.

That's not justification for ANY change in the Amateur Radio
Service.

MY OPINION is that you need to move back to Illinois and marry
Todd Daugherty, N9OGL. Maybe Lennie would move back (he's originally
from IL) and officiate for you? You two are cut from the same
cloth...Hmmmmmmmm...maybe a bit TOO close...Forget what I said...He's
probably in your bloodline and that would be incest.

you can can hold any opinion you like but you are likely nuts thinking
I would marry someone i have never met

) Considering some of the TRULY nutsy things you've said and done
)before, Markie, NOTHING involving you strikes me as "nuts".

I guess then you think I am quite sane or are truely ####ed up in the
head, most likely the later

No, I consider you to be functionally imparied. Your thought
processes are irrational and scattered. You are unable to organize
your thought in a constructive manner.

In short, your're a quite confused and otherwise situationally
inappropriate pesonality.

Besides it would be bigamy i guess you missed my mentioning my marrage

No...You "mentioned" you were building a house.

Lier i mentioned it long ago in your stalkng phase Stevie boy

Here we go with the "lier" thing again, Markie, and it's going to
wind up with the same result.

BTW I don't intend to answer wether I married a man or a women simply
because it is none of your busness


) As if anyone here would care...?!?!

You obvisly care a great deal about what I do with my genital and who I
do that with

No.

YOU insist on letting us know what your with it is.

)BBBBWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHAHAH=AD)AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH=ADAHAHA=
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH=ADAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA

! ! ! ! ! ! !

BTW it is also nuts of you to suggest I prefrom an act impossible in
the of Illinois

) The only things I consider as "impossible" are (1) Lennie ever
)doing what he said he would and (2) you ever gaining proficiency in
the
)English language above the second grade level.

In not adknowleding the realities of the law you prove yourself a
Sociiopath meeting the textbook meaning it is impossible for 2 guy to
marry in Illinois simple fact

First of all, it's "sociopath".

Secondly, I didn't say anything about being married
"legally"...Gays have been getting "married" for years, except it's
called a "civil union". I am sure the two of you could work out the
details.

Further I am certian you are liing in saying those are the only things
that are impossible that or plain mentaly ill. Or both of course. Which
is it?

First of all, I said what things I consider (as in an opinion)
to be impossible. Persoanlly, I believe in transwarp space drive,
telemolecular transportation, and that Michael Jackson's skin condition
really is vitilago (OK...two out of three...) None of those things
presently exisit, however they shall some day,

I also KNOW that Mark Morgan, formerly of Illiopolis, IL and late
of Chassell, MI, is a pathological liar who disgraces the honor of
Veterans living and deceased, and for whom strength of character and
honesty are nothng but words in a dictionary.

Does Mr Markie know what a liar you are?

Putz.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "an_old_friend" - Find messages by this
author
Date: 22 Jun 2005 02:48:44 -0700
Local: Wed,Jun 22 2005 5:48 am
Subject: The Pool
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Sh=
ow
original | Report Abuse

sorryJim but failing to back up an opinion doesn't mean they can't,=
may
mean they simply choose not to bother


verbage edited
) In other words, you refuse to answer.

No I was just cuting out some of your drivel but then I adknowledge
when I make cuts and don't disport the context of a persons remark,
unlike yourself

There was no "drivvel" to cut.

Yes there was and I bother to note my Cuts as a rule, you don't making
most of your posting lies of omission


Failing to "back up an opinion", Markie, means that either the
author was wrong, didn't have the facts, shot their mouth off just =
to
be heard or doesn't have the faith of conviction in his/her own bel=
iefs
to stand behind it.

you are simply wrong a common enough problem for you as I recall.
Indeed there are other reason

I was not wrong.

Yes you were and are

There are no reasons other than those cited.

) Indeed WHAT "

as I go to say but you missed the point try reading it if you can

Reading YOUR drivvle is the problem, Markie. You're functiaonlly
illiterate and hide behind as many multisyllable words as you can,
whether you used them correctly or not.

If so, so what. That you can't read?


other reason..." ?!?!
an example I think Ham Radio would better off if Morse encoded CW were
in fact banned. I have reasons to belive that but i know they will not
convince you or Jim, or any Procoder. so why waste the bandwidth my
failure does not mean I don't have them

) You'd "ban" the simpliest, easiest to emit mode simply because
)you're too lazy to do it...

Lier

Markie...you and I went throught he drill with you and "lier"
before...Your change of residence does nothing to change that.

HE DRILL? you reaaly are sex obcessed.

But you got one right my moving has nothing to do with you propensity
for lies flashoods and distortion


I said and have said many times I think wewould better off banning
the mode, never said I would do if I had the power

Sure you have.

More lies

On occassions too numerous to count.

Not even once


) That's the epitome of selfish!

No you are the epitome of paranoid

I'm not paranoid at all. But you are still selfish. Your
suggestions, ideas and other "recommendations" for the Amateur Radio
service hinge on nothing more than your inadequacies in it yourself.

You see any discusion of a posssible change that could be proposed as
an attack where none was made. I have said that there is merit in
Banning morse, as well as AM phone for that matter when I have gone at
greater length support your right (and everyone else's for that
matter) to engage in an activity I consider unproductive even harmful
to the ARS

If my opinion relate in some than I can't deal with morse, maybe you
are even right, doesn't change the fact it is my opinion


That's not justification for ANY change in the Amateur Radio
Service.

GIGO


MY OPINION is that you need to move back to Illinois and marry
Todd Daugherty, N9OGL. Maybe Lennie would move back (he's original=
ly
from IL) and officiate for you? You two are cut from the same
cloth...Hmmmmmmmm...maybe a bit TOO close...Forget what I said...He=
's
probably in your bloodline and that would be incest.

you can can hold any opinion you like but you are likely nuts thinking
I would marry someone i have never met

) Considering some of the TRULY nutsy things you've said and done
)before, Markie, NOTHING involving you strikes me as "nuts".

I guess then you think I am quite sane or are truely ####ed up in the
head, most likely the later

No, I consider you to be functionally imparied. Your thought
processes are irrational and scattered. You are unable to organize
your thought in a constructive manner.

Back to practicing medicine without a license Nursie?

In short, your're a quite confused and otherwise situationally
inappropriate pesonality.

Besides it would be bigamy i guess you missed my mentioning my marra=
ge

No...You "mentioned" you were building a house.

Lier i mentioned it long ago in your stalkng phase Stevie boy

Here we go with the "lier" thing again, Markie, and it's going to
wind up with the same result.

Indeedyou are getting a few more things right

BTW I don't intend to answer wether I married a man or a women simply
because it is none of your busness


) As if anyone here would care...?!?!

You obvisly care a great deal about what I do with my genital and who I
do that with

No.

Lier

YOU insist on letting us know what your with it is.

Lieing stalker, I show up againafter years and YOU go a dig stuff out
that is ireelavant to Ham radio, and try to make a big deal out of it


)BBBBWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHAHAH=AD)AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH=ADAHA=
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH=ADAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHA

! ! ! ! ! ! !

BTW it is also nuts of you to suggest I prefrom an act impossible in
the of Illinois

) The only things I consider as "impossible" are (1) Lennie ever
)doing what he said he would and (2) you ever gaining proficiency in
the
)English language above the second grade level.

In not adknowleding the realities of the law you prove yourself a
Sociiopath meeting the textbook meaning it is impossible for 2 guy to
marry in Illinois simple fact

First of all, it's "sociopath".

More speling Nazi? Obviosly you understood well enough

Secondly, I didn't say anything about being married
"legally"...Gays have been getting "married" for years, except it's
called a "civil union". I am sure the two of you could work out the
details.

I supose we could IF either of us were interested but what busness is
it yours?



Further I am certian you are liing in saying those are the only things
that are impossible that or plain mentaly ill. Or both of course. Which
is it?

First of all, I said what things I consider (as in an opinion)
to be impossible. Persoanlly, I believe in transwarp space drive,
telemolecular transportation, and that Michael Jackson's skin condition
really is vitilago (OK...two out of three...) None of those things
presently exisit, however they shall some day,

So the statement that you don't beleive any else in the world (or would
you prefer universe?) is impoosible is plaily a lie. Indeed you have
satted something along the line of it is impossible that I have been in
the service

I never said anything about your opinion on tranwarps or transmat , and
I'll stay well away from anything to do with poorMJ


You are a stalker a Bigot and a disgraceto the uniform you cliam to
have worn

A disgrace to medicine

a Lair distroter of context

Hypocrite

Sex Obcessed, (and perhaps sex repressed too)

and likely represed Homosexual


Does Mr Markie know what a liar you are?

Auf anglish bitte?
=20
Putz.

Lunatic
=20
Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

Steve, why do you do such things?

Because people like you, Lennie, Todd and Markie provide more than
adequate opportunities to have fun.

Len nor I have anything to do with your grudge with Mark, and if you
consider your posting a form of "fun" then you truly do have mental
problems.

You're an idiot.

Coming FROM an idiot, I guess you'd know, eh...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

Your posting this, and all the things like it, isn't that far from
those dispicable posts made about your daughter.

You can apologize to Mark and be a better man.

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Bunch of trash snipped.

In not adknowleding the realities of the law you prove yourself a
Sociiopath meeting the textbook meaning it is impossible for 2 guy to
marry in Illinois simple fact

First of all, it's "sociopath".

More speling Nazi? Obviosly you understood well enough

Not really...it takes a while to wade through your verbal garbage,
Mark.

I expect that trying to "read" a Kindergartner's "painting", but
not from an adult.

You should be six kinds of ashamed...especially when the technology
is there to cover your six for you.

Secondly, I didn't say anything about being married
"legally"...Gays have been getting "married" for years, except it's
called a "civil union". I am sure the two of you could work out the
details.

I supose we could IF either of us were interested but what busness is
it yours?

I just think you two would make a cute couple.

Further I am certian you are liing in saying those are the only things
that are impossible that or plain mentaly ill. Or both of course. Which
is it?

First of all, I said what things I consider (as in an opinion)
to be impossible. Persoanlly, I believe in transwarp space drive,
telemolecular transportation, and that Michael Jackson's skin condition
really is vitilago (OK...two out of three...) None of those things
presently exisit, however they shall some day,

So the statement that you don't beleive any else in the world (or would
you prefer universe?) is impoosible is plaily a lie. Indeed you have
satted something along the line of it is impossible that I have been in
the service

It is impossible that you've been in the service.

You've even acknowledged that you lied about it.

There's nothing left for me to do but laugh at you for it.

I never said anything about your opinion on tranwarps or transmat , and
I'll stay well away from anything to do with poorMJ

You missed the point again. And why can't you get the subjects
right even when they are right in front of you to copy from, Mark??

You are a stalker a Bigot and a disgraceto the uniform you cliam to
have worn

You're a liar, a liar and a liar.

(1) If I was a "stalker", you'd never know it.

(2) If I was a bigot, you'd be hanging from a tree.

(3) If I was a disgrace to the uniform of ANY organization I've
ever been in, then I'd not have the restraint and professionalism to
keep from doing items 1 and 2

A disgrace to medicine

Gee..that's strange...I'm one of only 12 LPN's within 100 miles of
here who can do the things I do...

a Lair distroter of context

Huh? A what?

Hypocrite

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...That's cute. You first lie about being
a Field Grade Army officer, then lie about being a Company Grade Army
officer, then lie about haivng ever served...Then you have the temerity
to call others who DID serve "a disgrace" even though you didn't know
them when they served...But you have the cajones to call THEM
"hypocites".............?!?!?!?!

Sex Obcessed, (and perhaps sex repressed too)

You mean "obscessed"..?!?! Hardly.

and likely represed Homosexual

Nope. Nice try at diversion, Mark!

Does Mr Markie know what a liar you are?

Auf anglish bitte?

Geeze, Mark, you even abuse the German language.

Putz.

Lunatic

Your mama.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

Steve, why do you do such things?

Because people like you, Lennie, Todd and Markie provide more than
adequate opportunities to have fun.

Len nor I have anything to do with your grudge with Mark, and if you
consider your posting a form of "fun" then you truly do have mental
problems.

Brain, you've NOT been paying attention...A G A I N ! ! !

You said "Why do (I) do such thingS?" (emphasis mine on the plural)

I answered your question directly and honestly.

You, Mark and Lennie all provide more than adequate opportunites to
have fun. You lie more than a cheap Persian rug, get caught up in your
own tales, and ultimately wind up cussing and throwning tantrums.

Then your grasp on reality continues to slip.

You're an idiot.

Coming FROM an idiot, I guess you'd know, eh...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

Your posting this, and all the things like it, isn't that far from
those dispicable posts made about your daughter.

It's a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG way from desecrating the
memory of ANY deceased person, Brain.

Taelor never had the opportunity to fend for herself.

You, Mark and Lennie...well...

You can apologize to Mark and be a better man.

Apologize for what, Brain?

You're always about "apologizing", yet there's years of YOUR
mistruths, deceit and outright fabrications out there that you've shown
absolutely NO interest in making amends for...

SO where do YOU get off suggesting others apologize for ANYthing?

Steve, K4YZ

Suit yourself and continue to be the Steve that we all know. Never a
change for the better, always a turn for the worse.

You are to be pittied.

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

You, Mark and Lennie all provide more than adequate opportunites to
have fun. You lie more than a cheap Persian rug, get caught up in your
own tales, and ultimately wind up cussing and throwning tantrums.

Then your grasp on reality continues to slip.

It's not my "reality" that's problematic, Brain.

It's yours.

Where's that "unlicensed devices" data? "Overblown" ARES
statistics?

Etc, etc, etc.

You're always about "apologizing", yet there's years of YOUR
mistruths, deceit and outright fabrications out there that you've shown
absolutely NO interest in making amends for...

SO where do YOU get off suggesting others apologize for ANYthing?

Suit yourself and continue to be the Steve that we all know. Never a
change for the better, always a turn for the worse.

There's always a change.

I just dont' change where tolerating liars and deceivers comes in.

(That would be you, Lennie and Mark, byt the way.....)

You are to be pittied.

By who?

You...?!?!

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiight.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

You, Mark and Lennie all provide more than adequate opportunites to
have fun. You lie more than a cheap Persian rug, get caught up in your
own tales, and ultimately wind up cussing and throwning tantrums.

Then your grasp on reality continues to slip.

It's not my "reality" that's problematic, Brain.

It's yours.

Where's that "unlicensed devices" data? "Overblown" ARES
statistics?

Etc, etc, etc.

You're always about "apologizing", yet there's years of YOUR
mistruths, deceit and outright fabrications out there that you've shown
absolutely NO interest in making amends for...

SO where do YOU get off suggesting others apologize for ANYthing?

Suit yourself and continue to be the Steve that we all know. Never a
change for the better, always a turn for the worse.

There's always a change.

I just dont' change where tolerating liars and deceivers comes in.

(That would be you, Lennie and Mark, byt the way.....)

You are to be pittied.

By who?

You...?!?!

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiight.

Steve, K4YZ

Anyone who starts a new thread titled:

"WARNING! GAY PAGAN DRAFTEE IDIOT BACK IN TOWN! KB9RQZ and N9OGL to
WED..?!?!"

is to be pittied.

Whatever gave you the idea that Tod and Mark might wed?

Why do you continue with your gay inuendos?

Why don't you seek help?

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

You are to be pittied.

By who?

You...?!?!

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiight.

Steve, K4YZ

Anyone who starts a new thread titled:

"WARNING! GAY PAGAN DRAFTEE IDIOT BACK IN TOWN! KB9RQZ and N9OGL to
WED..?!?!"

is to be pittied.

And I asked...BY WHO? Or more correctly, by WHOM?

Whatever gave you the idea that Tod and Mark might wed?

Nothing. It was a joke. But they are so much alike and share
similar persuations, that it's not beyond the realm of the possible
these days.

Why do you continue with your gay inuendos?

Uhhhhhhhhhhh...With Mark and Todd there's no innuendo. They are.

Why don't you seek help?

For what?

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

You are to be pittied.

By who?

You...?!?!

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiight.

Steve, K4YZ

Anyone who starts a new thread titled:

"WARNING! GAY PAGAN DRAFTEE IDIOT BACK IN TOWN! KB9RQZ and N9OGL to
WED..?!?!"

is to be pittied.

And I asked...BY WHO? Or more correctly, by WHOM?

By people who pity you.

Whatever gave you the idea that Tod and Mark might wed?

Nothing. It was a joke. But they are so much alike and share
similar persuations, that it's not beyond the realm of the possible
these days.

A joke? It looks like another Robeson lie to me.

Why do you continue with your gay inuendos?

Uhhhhhhhhhhh...With Mark and Todd there's no innuendo. They are.

What business is it of yours?

Why don't you seek help?

For what?

Steve, K4YZ

For everything that ails you. Nurse, heal thyself.