Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 05, 02:46 AM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default another point of Info

In reading the newsgroup lately I get the impression that the the
relitvely new 60 band does NOT premit Morse Encoded CW in at least
some region of the band.

Is my impression corect.

  #2   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 05, 02:55 AM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"an_old_friend" wrote

In reading the newsgroup lately I get the impression that the the
relitvely new 60 band does NOT premit Morse Encoded CW in at least
some region of the band.

Is my impression corect.


There is no 60M "band". US amateurs are allocated 5 discreet 2K8J3E channels
centered on 5332 kHz, 5348 kHz, 5368 kHz, 5373 kHz and 5405 kHz.

73, de Hans, K0HB



  #3   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 05, 04:15 AM
Hey Boy Riley
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"KØHB" wrote in message
link.net...

"an_old_friend" wrote

In reading the newsgroup lately I get the impression that the the
relitvely new 60 band does NOT premit Morse Encoded CW in at least
some region of the band.

Is my impression corect.


There is no 60M "band". US amateurs are allocated 5 discreet 2K8J3E
channels centered on 5332 kHz, 5348 kHz, 5368 kHz, 5373 kHz and 5405 kHz.

73, de Hans, K0HB




There are several long haul truckers in the range of 5425 to 5560 kHz.




  #4   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 05, 04:13 AM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default



K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

In reading the newsgroup lately I get the impression that the the
relitvely new 60 band does NOT premit Morse Encoded CW in at least
some region of the band.

Is my impression corect.


There is no 60M "band". US amateurs are allocated 5 discreet 2K8J3E chan=

nels

Auf Anglish Bitte?

I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but you I
guess answering a question si too much for you
centered on 5332 kHz, 5348 kHz, 5368 kHz, 5373 kHz and 5405 kHz.
=20
73, de Hans, K0HB


  #5   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 05, 04:46 AM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"an_old_friend" wrote

I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't
allowed but you I guess answering a question si too much
for you


Hey Dump Huck, I did answer your question, and I did so quite precisely. As a
licensed amateur, what part of "2K8J3E" don't you understand?

73, de Hans, K0HB







  #6   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 05, 05:14 PM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default



K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't
allowed but you I guess answering a question si too much
for you


Hey Dump Huck, I did answer your question, and I did so quite precisely. =

As a
licensed amateur, what part of "2K8J3E" don't you understand?


All of it. tht sort of usage is not in vogue, nor is it in english.

73, de Hans, K0HB


73's on an couple of snide posts is about what you'd expect

  #7   Report Post  
Old July 5th 05, 02:49 AM
robert casey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I did answer your question, and I did so quite precisely. As a
licensed amateur, what part of "2K8J3E" don't you understand?

It's an FCC specification that essentially says "USB carrying
voice of frequencies 300 to 3KHz". Also the FCC specifies
a SSB channel frequency by the frequency in the center of
the transmitted RF spectra. Audio at 300Hz corresponds
to frequency "X-(2700/2)", 3KHz to "X+(2700/2)" where "X"
is the center of the channel. "X" would be 1650Hz higher than
the traditional ham radio method of specifying a USB frequency
(hams specify the frequency of the suppressed carrier). Aside
from 60M, the FCC doesn't specify how we are to specify our
frequencies; they just say "Here's your permitted bands for
SSB, keep all of your RF inside them". 60M is special in
that the FCC wanted hams to blend seamlessly with other existing
users (meaning that those other users could easily listen and talk
(say in emergencies) to us on their existing channelized equipment.
And we got these five specific channels because the other users
don't use them that much compared to other channels.
  #8   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 05, 06:16 AM
Jim Hampton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nice try.

Hans has forgotten more than you will ever know ))

Please ZBM-2


With all due regards,
Jim AA2QA



"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...


KØHB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

In reading the newsgroup lately I get the impression that the the
relitvely new 60 band does NOT premit Morse Encoded CW in at least
some region of the band.

Is my impression corect.


There is no 60M "band". US amateurs are allocated 5 discreet 2K8J3E

channels

Auf Anglish Bitte?

I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but you I
guess answering a question si too much for you
centered on 5332 kHz, 5348 kHz, 5368 kHz, 5373 kHz and 5405 kHz.

73, de Hans, K0HB



  #9   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 05, 07:01 PM
OW
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...
Nice try.

Hans has forgotten more than you will ever know ))

Please ZBM-2


With all due regards,
Jim AA2QA



How long have you been a K0HB sycophant?



  #10   Report Post  
Old July 4th 05, 06:13 PM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default



an_old_friend wrote:
K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

In reading the newsgroup lately I get the impression that the the
relitvely new 60 band does NOT premit Morse Encoded CW in at least
some region of the band.

Is my impression corect.


There is no 60M "band". US amateurs are allocated 5 discreet 2K8J3E ch=

annels

Auf Anglish Bitte?


Why?

You can't do English any better than you could Serbo-Croatian.

He answered your question exactly.

I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but you I
guess answering a question si too much for you


He did answer your question. Precisely.

Perhaps your "higher standards" you refered to in another thread
aren't so high, eh?...

centered on 5332 kHz, 5348 kHz, 5368 kHz, 5373 kHz and 5405 kHz.


Geeze, Markie...He gave you the specific mode AND frequencies
authorized.

And then you don't even have the good courtesy to thank him.

Good thing you didn't ask about power limitations...he would've
had to use a REAL technical term...ERP...That would ahve REALLY
confused you!

Sheesh!

Steve, K4YZ



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARC5 Transmitter problem ron_ayling Boatanchors 7 March 22nd 05 12:38 AM
More Receiver Reviews and Info including 'other' People's WebPages RHF Shortwave 2 January 13th 05 11:58 PM
1930's Futuristic Shortwave Wood Radio - Searchlight radio - info wanted [email protected] Shortwave 0 January 12th 05 04:56 PM
OLD motorola trunking information jack smith Scanner 1 December 12th 03 09:48 AM
Stigar i Kveom Asle Heggheim Shortwave 0 November 15th 03 07:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017