AIDS: (as it applies to Mark Morgan, KB9RQZ

Arrogant
Ignorant
Depreciating
Selfish

Just a lesson for you, Markie...

Since you like to make up "definitions" as you go...there's one of
my own.

See how doing so confuses the reader and the conversation...?!?!

Now...back to the ususal rants.......

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

agreed but it can none the less be relied on to to make the right
emissions, indeed I can'r tell if it were not neither can most Hams

No...it CANNOT be "relied on" to make the right emissions.

why not

Becasue it's a machine, and machines wear out.

YOU are required to ensure that it does.

nope I am respoible if doesn't

You are "respoible" to make sure it doesn't happen...NOT to wait
until it does.

Can you test YOUR rig to see that it complies with the rules

Absolutely.

prove it

Simple.

Write a letter to Riley Hollingsworth.

Ask him how many times I've been cited for busting Part 97
technical standards.

E V E R Y RF generating device has the potential of radiating a
signal other than the one designed for.

yep it does your point

If your radio was doing how would YOU know


Ask Lennie.

why you aran't saying something I don't know

There's a LOT of things I can say that you don't know.

which doesn't answer the question

There's not enough bandwidth to address what you don't know,
Markie.

That you DON'T know a lot about Amateur Radio is enough for this
forum.

For example, just about anything about Amateur Radio, the Armed
Forces, healthcare, sociology, and a wealth of other topics.

more venom

Nope.

It's all true.

Sorry you don't agree, but thems the facts.

I DID state it was dangerous to have children around
you...but that's only becasue you are ignorant, illiterate, and have
OTHER sexual deviations. Pedophilia was not brought up by me, but since
it's obviously on YOUR mind, why IS it on your mind...?!?!

it is the clear implication indeed you repat the libel when you say
anything about my sexuality has anything to do with children

One can be a danger to children without being a pedophile.

None of my sexaul practices have anything to do with children

One can be a danger to children without being a pedophile.

If being ignorant was a reason to take children away yours would be
long gone

Being ignorant IS a reason to get kids taken away which is why my
non-majority daughter is still here.

Or your "partner" for suggesting such might be possible
considering the aforementioned evidence that exists in Google archives.

Huh?

Have your "partner" read it, then write it out on gradeschool
learning tablet in crayone for you, Mikeie.

Mikeie who is that

That would be you.

again I can free admit to everything you I posted none of which make me
a pedophile as you imply

I didn't say you were a pedophile.

You implied and you contiue to do so

I implied nothing of the sort.

I DID say you are dangerous to leave children around. That
doesn't necessarilly mean you're a pesophile.

I said it would be dangerous to leave children in your care.

by impling my sexaulity has anything to do with children that is

Not about sexuality...about deviance.

There's a big difference.

not realy all is libel

Nope.

The fact alone that you've professed mental defect and
acknowledged your predaliction for lying in public sets that stage.

so in hassling me you admit to being a lair

I'm neither hassling you nor am I a "lair".

yes you are

No, I'm not.

You come here voluntarily. You post in a publc forum, ergo you
grant permission for any who care to do so to comment on your posts.

coment yes

thraten libel harrass stalk no

Was that a sentence?

What's "thraten"...????

An no one's threatening, harrassing or stalking you.

I simply point out your errors, lack of English comprehension and
your volumous pages of lies and deceit.

no you make threats, comit libel

No to both.

You'e an admitted liar and sexual deviant, Markie. Your words,
not mine.

My point is that anyone can surf Google under any of your
"KONSTANS" nomme-de-guerre's you've used and see what kind of a lyig
creep you are.

what is wrong with using my name online?

"KONSTANS" is not your name.

but it is my middle name Stevie

But not here. And not with a "K".

you have changed Call sign a few times (4 changes 3 calls by my count)

We're not discussing Amateur Radio callsigns. All of which were
legal administratives procedures, documented in public archives.

I am never sure what you are discussing I am discussing issues I am
sure you are not

but then that is my right

It's your right to be confused? Missed that one in Civics class.

and where I do deny that I do lie

I do reservse to right to point out where you make up things I never
said, but I am not honest about many facts in my bio. I have my
reasons, and it is my right.

I've not made up ANYthing about anything you've "said" Markie.

yes you have

Nope. All of it true.

I couldn't have made that stuff up if I wanted to.

you did make a lot of it up

Nope. Not a lot. The N9OGL and KB9RQZ thing was a joke, but
everything else is true.

You continue to prove it.

They can also surf KB9RQZ, "MWMORGAN" and a plethora of othr names
you've come and gone under as you bounce from ISP to ISP...

you oppose shoping for better deals on interent?

Sure you can.

then what is your beef with my doing so

you clearly have one to be bring it up after 8 years

Nope.

It's pointing out how you've (hillariously) tried to "hide" behind
some of them...As if that abortion of the English language of yours
could be hidden.

It's just been funny on those occassions (like with "mwmorgan")
where you initially tried to "hide" your identity with that creepy
abortion of what you call "English".

a simple lie on your part, each I change ISP I end with a different
email address

Not even a complex lie, Markie.

You tried to hide.

Speaking of which, I can only hope and pray that you finally
ditched that ISP you alleged was charging you $5/hr.

well I still subcribe to their service for use when I travel, since the
5$/hour rate came wit the use of a 1-800number to reach them was
cheaper than paying long distance

Sheeesh....

you object to me deciding what service are of value to me

It's not about what's "of value" to you Markie...YOU were the one
who stated that it was costing you so much money to read "dreck" in
your mailbox because of the cost of yoru ISP...

And my AOL still only costs less than $23 A MONTH.

Plus long distanse if needed

Not needed. I have yet to go anywhere where using remote dial-up
was necessary.

You are not now in such circumstances, nor as best I can tell,
were you in Illiopolis.

and the trouble of reporgrming the phone evrytime I change city on a
trip

Oh whoopie-doo...10-15 seconds of time.

NetZero, Wal-Mart Connect and others are even less.

but don't provide the service I want and am willing to pay for when I
travel

Uh huh....

making up stuff as a point of fact my partner is female was avoiding it
becuase it wasn't and isn't any of your affair

Your sister? Or mom?

more libel

Nope.

yes it is libel

Nope.

Questions.

Notice the "question marks" after each?

so

you are impling I am have sex with those persons

Are you?

No self-respecting English speaking woman I know would
tolerate a professed liar like you unless they were in your gene pool
or your will.

you have a limited aquantanceship, but then she is in my will of course
isn't your wifein yours?

as to wether she is self respecting you have never met me now you
presume to judge a women you have not even read her words?

I am sure if they make a keyboard set up in jibberishese we'll be
hearing from her too,

more insults

Learn manners

BBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHHA
! ! !

Hey punk! YOU are NOT the person to be telling ANYone about
"manners!"

So he's "guilty" for imparting MORE knowledge than you are capble
of processing...

He imparted no knowledge something you have already agreed

No, I have NOT agreed.

Hans clearly DID "impart knowledge"...YOU, on the otherhand, were
just too stupid to assimilate it.

whcih means you agree he imparted nothing to me, for what ever reason

No.

yes

Nope. Hans did impart knowledge to you.

You WERE and STILL CONTINUE TO BE too ignorant to assimilate it.

It means you were too stupid to assimilate it.

even if ture it maens he imparted nothing

It's "ture" and it "maens" you are too ignorant to understand it.

Hans' ONLY mistake was assuming you'd make use of it.

I am sure a lot of things are "news to (you)", Mikie.

I am often surpirsed when you inform me what I am up to

I ahve no doubt that you often require external forces to guide
your day.

Auf Anglish bitte

oder auf Deutche bitte

prehaps you will make more sense in german

If I wrote Je parle Fransse that would I was trying to show people I
speak french?

Yes. And you mispelled "French" wrong.

nope would mean I was making a point

No...it would mean you look ignorant trying to "speak" foreign
languages you clearly don't know how to speak.

If you're going to try and write in that language, can you not so
it correctly?

obvously, not why do ask?

Was that a sentence?

What were you asking?

You're a liar. I don't tolerate liars.

grow up

I have. And you're still a liar and I don't tolerate liars.

you do tolerate them several hunderd of them they are called Congress

There's some good libel for ya...

And who's "Jim Ney"...???

Jim you he is round here

Huh?

Who are you talking about?

There a half dozen "Jim's" who participate in this forum.

Only see one these days
but he is a person with 2 properites relavant at the moment, he isn't
you or ahns,a dn he is procode

Huh?

What's "ahns'a"...?!?!

What two properties? We're discussing real estate now?

(UNSNIP)...moment one in this thread since of course If aplogize to
Hans now you will not consider it sincere, so logicly thier is
certianly no point in my doing so

Sure there is...

Because it's the right thing to do.

according to you No it would not be

Sure it would.

No it would not BYS since if I aplogize to Hans I would be sateing
another lie

I have no doubt that you are sated by many lies.

It would show that you've got at least a SMALL spark of civility in
you.

then you are leing about your intolerance of lying Stevie

Nope.

So far.....Squat.

Still squat.

Steve, K4YZ