"an_old_friend" wrote

KØHB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

In any change in the system there is the clear poetencail
for large scale adjustment of the licensesure of those involved

False! Absolutely false!

True absolutely ture

Wrong again.

You said "In any change in the system".

I showed you an example of a change with NO POTENTIAL for large scale
adjustment, disproving your statement on it's face. Them is the facts!

73, de Hans, K0HB

yeah, no one likes change but a baby with a wet diaper!

john

"KXHB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"an_old_friend" wrote

KXHB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

In any change in the system there is the clear poetencail
for large scale adjustment of the licensesure of those involved

False! Absolutely false!

True absolutely ture

Wrong again.

You said "In any change in the system".

I showed you an example of a change with NO POTENTIAL for large scale
adjustment, disproving your statement on it's face. Them is the facts!

73, de Hans, K0HB

K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

In any change in the system there is the clear poetencail
for large scale adjustment of the licensesure of those involved

False! Absolutely false!

True absolutely ture

Wrong again.

You said "In any change in the system".

I showed you an example of a change with NO POTENTIAL for large scale
adjustment, disproving your statement on it's face. Them is the facts!

which has nothing to do with the point any change has the potentail
even your "proposal" has the potentail for large changes since their is
of course no assuance that it would be adpoted as is

Any time the Govt decides to changes regs there exists a protentail for
upheaval

indeed your proposal is an a large scale upheaval in just going to 2
clases instead of the 6 we still have on the books

your proposal is a large scale adjudgement
=20
73, de Hans, K0HB

KØHB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote


KØHB wrote:

"an_old_friend" wrote


In any change in the system there is the clear poetencail
for large scale adjustment of the licensesure of those involved

False! Absolutely false!


True absolutely ture


Wrong again.

You said "In any change in the system".

I showed you an example of a change with NO POTENTIAL for large scale
adjustment, disproving your statement on it's face. Them is the facts!

73, de Hans, K0HB


For goodness sakes, don't confuse the idiot with facts. He can't handle
facts. Lets see, he did manage to get most of the letters in the word
POTENTIAL, now if he just had enough brains to get them in the right order.