Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K=D8HB wrote: "Bill Sohl" wrote We supported ONE-time upgrades...NOT a permanent change in testing going forward. Again, we will just have to disagree as to what that translates to. You are entitled to your opinion, as am I. A trip down memory lane, Bill. A few years ago, while he was Executive D= irector of NCI, we saw this regarding Fred Maia. Lee Blaske writes: (about W5YI) I found one of his opinions quite interesting. He feels that since peop= le who acquire entry level ham tickets invariably purchase their equipment ass= embled these days, they no longer need to possess the knowledge needed to "home-brew." Because of this fact, he thinks that the majority of quest= ions regarding math and theory (knowledge mainly needed to build equipment) = should be removed from entry level tests, and simply replaced with questions on operating technique and regulations. If he had his way, math and theory questions would only be part of the Advanced and Extra Class license te= sts. In other words, theory and math questions would be removed from the Techn= ician examination. I think Fred is still a Director at NCI, and even more scary, has influen= ce on the makeup of examinations through NCVEC and his association with W5YI-VE= C=2E I think Fred's very "unique" ideas about Amatuer Radio and VE testing are no doubt part-and-parcel of the inordinately high number of people who require re-test by the FCC. He should be ashamed. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BILL CHEEK vs HUGH DUFF | Scanner | |||
Bill Pfeiffer | Broadcasting |