Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leo wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:37:30 GMT, "K=D8HB" wrote: An interesting announcement! Here in Canada, Morse Code is now an alte= rnative method of qualifying for HF privileges. In other words - Morse survived! Morse Code *testing* survived - it's just not mandatory anymore in Canada. IIRC, this was exactly what the commentary on the proposal supported. A couple of the other requests from the Amateur community via the RAC proposal) were granted as well - increasing the pass marks on the exams to 70% from 60%, and the addition of commercial kit-building privileges for Basic license holders. Not bad - now there's a regulatory agency that listens. Well done, Industry Canada! I agree 100%! They found a way to give everyone some of what they wanted. They listened to what the majority of those expressing an opinion supported, and acted on it. They produced a set of regulations designed to reconcile or at least minimize polarization, rather than increase it. What concepts, eh? ;-) Perhaps we in the USA should suggest such a system to FCC.... 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #705 | General | |||
RAC Bulletin - Industry Canada Posts Responses to RAC Recommendations on Morse Code | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #620 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #620 | General |