Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N2EY:
Perhaps introduce testing for "African Message Drum" also, bet some of those guys could pound out a little ditty and have it carry a message to! Maybe chant a little rap with it too! Some testing in the care maintenance of carrier pigeons might be in order to, for the guys who wanted real DX! John wrote in message ups.com... Leo wrote: On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:37:30 GMT, "KØHB" wrote: An interesting announcement! Here in Canada, Morse Code is now an alternative method of qualifying for HF privileges. In other words - Morse survived! Morse Code *testing* survived - it's just not mandatory anymore in Canada. IIRC, this was exactly what the commentary on the proposal supported. A couple of the other requests from the Amateur community via the RAC proposal) were granted as well - increasing the pass marks on the exams to 70% from 60%, and the addition of commercial kit-building privileges for Basic license holders. Not bad - now there's a regulatory agency that listens. Well done, Industry Canada! I agree 100%! They found a way to give everyone some of what they wanted. They listened to what the majority of those expressing an opinion supported, and acted on it. They produced a set of regulations designed to reconcile or at least minimize polarization, rather than increase it. What concepts, eh? ;-) Perhaps we in the USA should suggest such a system to FCC.... 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #705 | General | |||
RAC Bulletin - Industry Canada Posts Responses to RAC Recommendations on Morse Code | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #620 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #620 | General |