Roger Wiseman is like a Slinky...
 

"Nomen Nescio" wrote in message
...
In article
"Lloydie" nospam@glendale wrote:

Roger Wiseman (Whining and crying)

Hi Lardass! I see you can't go two ****ing minutes without
whining about Roger Wiseman. He OWNS you, BOY!
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
...............................

That photo you placed in the singles group on Yahoo last year was very
telling, Wogie.
Did you ever take my advice and buy that shampoo that kills head lice?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

On 6 Aug 2005 12:46:15 -0000, Anonymous Secwet Woger wrote:
:
: That wasn't his photo, dumbass. You lose again. And, Roger
: doesn't have long hair and unlike you has hair to shampoo on a
: daily basis. Did you get that much needed Rogaine yet?
: BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!


"If a man have long hair it is a shame unto him." -- Paul, I Cor. 11:14

====================
"Just because YOU don't know how anonymous remailers work, doesn't
mean everybody else does, imbecile." -- Secwet Woger in message-id
s.it

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:41:15 +0200, Fritz Wuehler Secwet Hairy Woger wrote:
: In article
: Saggytits KKKevin Waldo Strom Lee
: blathered and ****s up again:
:
: "If a man have long hair it is a shame unto him." -- Paul, I
: Cor. 11:14
:
: Isn't it funny how all artistic depictions/renderings of that
: faggot Jesus (who got what he deserved on the cross) and his
: followers in the Bible all have long hair?

Those are derived from artists depictions from the middle ages.
During that epoch, long hair like yours was common, and it was natural
for the artists to paint Jesus to look like themselves.

In actuality, it is highly probable that Jesus had short hair. Even
the History Channel has put on programming which points that out.
Your own lack of scholarship is clearly evident in the comments quoted
above.

Paul (or Saul) lived during Jesus' time and was intimately familiar
with the customs of the day. Long hair like yours was regarded as
effeminate by most male Roman citizens (Saul was a Roman citizen), and
hence the quote from one of Saul's letters to the Corinthians.

If Saul were alive today, he would probably say "If Woger posts his
photo on Yahoo, it is a shame unto him."

And he would be right.



====================
"The good Christian should beware of mathematicians and all those who
make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that mathematicians
have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and confine
man in the bonds of Hell."
-- St. Augustine

Jesus came to establish the rules for the "new testament", many of the old
rules were suspended... if Jesus had walked around with short hair, such
as became the style this century, he would have had stood out like a sore
thumb...

John

On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 23:50:17 +0000, Stagger Lee wrote:

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:41:15 +0200, Fritz Wuehler Secwet Hairy Woger wrote:
: In article
: Saggytits KKKevin Waldo Strom Lee
: blathered and ****s up again:
:
: "If a man have long hair it is a shame unto him." -- Paul, I
: Cor. 11:14
:
: Isn't it funny how all artistic depictions/renderings of that
: faggot Jesus (who got what he deserved on the cross) and his
: followers in the Bible all have long hair?

Those are derived from artists depictions from the middle ages.
During that epoch, long hair like yours was common, and it was natural
for the artists to paint Jesus to look like themselves.

In actuality, it is highly probable that Jesus had short hair. Even
the History Channel has put on programming which points that out.
Your own lack of scholarship is clearly evident in the comments quoted
above.

Paul (or Saul) lived during Jesus' time and was intimately familiar
with the customs of the day. Long hair like yours was regarded as
effeminate by most male Roman citizens (Saul was a Roman citizen), and
hence the quote from one of Saul's letters to the Corinthians.

If Saul were alive today, he would probably say "If Woger posts his
photo on Yahoo, it is a shame unto him."

And he would be right.



====================
"The good Christian should beware of mathematicians and all those who
make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that mathematicians
have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and confine
man in the bonds of Hell."
-- St. Augustine

"Father, forgive John for he know not what he says."

"John Smith" wrote in message
...

Jesus came to establish the rules for the "new testament", many of the old
rules were suspended... if Jesus had walked around with short hair, such
as became the style this century, he would have had stood out like a sore
thumb...

John

On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 23:50:17 +0000, Stagger Lee wrote:

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:41:15 +0200, Fritz Wuehler Secwet Hairy Woger
wrote:
: In article
: Saggytits KKKevin Waldo Strom Lee
: blathered and ****s up again:
:
: "If a man have long hair it is a shame unto him." -- Paul, I
: Cor. 11:14
:
: Isn't it funny how all artistic depictions/renderings of that
: faggot Jesus (who got what he deserved on the cross) and his
: followers in the Bible all have long hair?

Those are derived from artists depictions from the middle ages.
During that epoch, long hair like yours was common, and it was natural
for the artists to paint Jesus to look like themselves.

In actuality, it is highly probable that Jesus had short hair. Even
the History Channel has put on programming which points that out.
Your own lack of scholarship is clearly evident in the comments quoted
above.

Paul (or Saul) lived during Jesus' time and was intimately familiar
with the customs of the day. Long hair like yours was regarded as
effeminate by most male Roman citizens (Saul was a Roman citizen), and
hence the quote from one of Saul's letters to the Corinthians.

If Saul were alive today, he would probably say "If Woger posts his
photo on Yahoo, it is a shame unto him."

And he would be right.



====================
"The good Christian should beware of mathematicians and all those who
make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that mathematicians
have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and confine
man in the bonds of Hell."
-- St. Augustine

Lucifer:

You old hot devil you, the women have been asking around for you!

Really don't know huh?

He changed "an eye for an eye" to "turn the other cheek"...

He changed not being able to eat pork to now being able to eat it...
(someone needs to sneak some ham in the muslims food! They don't know
and haven't tried it yet... grin)

.... jews are still pi$$ed off about a lot of it, don't recognize Jesus as
the messiah, some will grant he bears prophet status...

.... but then, much of this doesn't have to do with amateur policy,
although it can't hurt to have a catholic priest bless your rig and
antenna!

John

On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 21:00:32 -0500, Lucifer wrote:

"Father, forgive John for he know not what he says."

"John Smith" wrote in message
...

Jesus came to establish the rules for the "new testament", many of the old
rules were suspended... if Jesus had walked around with short hair, such
as became the style this century, he would have had stood out like a sore
thumb...

John

On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 23:50:17 +0000, Stagger Lee wrote:

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:41:15 +0200, Fritz Wuehler Secwet Hairy Woger
wrote:
: In article
: Saggytits KKKevin Waldo Strom Lee
: blathered and ****s up again:
:
: "If a man have long hair it is a shame unto him." -- Paul, I
: Cor. 11:14
:
: Isn't it funny how all artistic depictions/renderings of that
: faggot Jesus (who got what he deserved on the cross) and his
: followers in the Bible all have long hair?

Those are derived from artists depictions from the middle ages.
During that epoch, long hair like yours was common, and it was natural
for the artists to paint Jesus to look like themselves.

In actuality, it is highly probable that Jesus had short hair. Even
the History Channel has put on programming which points that out.
Your own lack of scholarship is clearly evident in the comments quoted
above.

Paul (or Saul) lived during Jesus' time and was intimately familiar
with the customs of the day. Long hair like yours was regarded as
effeminate by most male Roman citizens (Saul was a Roman citizen), and
hence the quote from one of Saul's letters to the Corinthians.

If Saul were alive today, he would probably say "If Woger posts his
photo on Yahoo, it is a shame unto him."

And he would be right.



====================
"The good Christian should beware of mathematicians and all those who
make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that mathematicians
have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and confine
man in the bonds of Hell."
-- St. Augustine

Anonymous wrote:
That photo (IKYABWAI)


And, Roger
doesn't have long hair and unlike you has hair to shampoo on a
daily basis.

Why are you shampooing your butt, wogie?

On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 16:55:32 -0700, John Smith
wrote:


Jesus came to establish the rules for the "new testament", many of the old
rules were suspended... if Jesus had walked around with short hair, such
as became the style this century, he would have had stood out like a sore
thumb...

John

(From the Church of Theists Suck)

What Would Jesus Do?

Advocate child abuse and murder amongst many other cruelties.

Christians are always claiming, "he’s the lamb", "our savior",
"the king of peace", "the embodiment of love", amongst the many other
names they associate with a loving, merciful nature. Jesus a nice
guy? Not in my book. Nor in any other person’s who is capable of
compassion and rationality. Let’s examine who the hell the Jesus
character really is. These verses will show not only is Jesus’
"loving" nature a joke but so are the Christians who worship him.
Jesus’ real mission to come to earth:

Jesus says that he has come to destroy families by making family
members hate each other. He has "come not to send peace, but a
sword." Matthew 10:34

Jesus says, "Don’t imagine that I came to bring peace on earth! No,
rather a sword lf you love your father, mother, sister, brother, more
than me, you are not worthy of being mine." The real beauty of this
verse is that Jesus demands people truly love him more then they love
their own family. I ask you how can we love someone that we can not
see or interact with? Love is an emotion pertaining to physical
existence not to faithful ideologies, yet God threatens you with Death
just because your love for your mother maybe stronger than your love
for him. Matthew 10:34

Families will be torn apart because of Jesus. "Brother shall deliver
up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children
shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to
death." Matthew 10:21

Jesus strongly approves of the law and the prophets. He hasn’t the
slightest objection to the cruelties of the Old Testament. Matthew
5:17

Jesus advocates murder and death:

Jesus condemns entire cities to dreadful deaths and to the eternal
torment of hell because they didn’t care for his preaching. Matthew
11:20

Jesus, whose clothes are dipped in blood, has a sharp sword sticking
out of his mouth. Thus attired, he treads the winepress of the wrath
of God. (The winepress is the actual press that humans shall be put
into so that we may be ground up.) Revelations 19:13-15

The beast and the false prophet are cast alive into a lake of fire.
The rest of us the unchosen will be killed with the sword of Jesus.
"An all the fowls were filled with their flesh." Revelations 19:20-21


Jesus says he is the only way to salvation yet he purposely
disillusions us so that we will go to hell:

Jesus explains that the reason he speaks in parables is so that no one
will understand him, "lest . . . they . . . should understand . . .
and should be converted, and I should heal them." Matthew 13:10-15

Jesus explains why he speaks in parables to confuse people so they
will go to hell. Mark 4:11-12

Jesus advocates child abuse:

Jesus is criticized by the Pharisees for not washing his hands before
eating. He defends himself by attacking them for not killing
disobedient children according to the commandment: "He that curseth
father or mother, let him die the death." Matthew 15:4-7

Abandon your wife and children for Jesus and he’ll give your a big
reward. Jesus asks that his followers abandon their children to
follow him. To leave your child is abuse, it’s called neglect, pure
and simple. Matthew 19:29

Jesus criticizes the Jews for not killing their disobedient children
according to Old Testament law. Mark 7:9

A few other things about Jesus:

Jesus says that those who have been less fortunate in this life will
have it even worse in the life to come. Mark 4:25

Jesus sends the devils into 2000 pigs, causing them to jump off a
cliff and be drowned in the sea. Clearly Jesus could have simply sent
the devils out, yet he chose instead to place them into pigs and kill
them. This is called animal abuse. Mark 5:12-13

Jesus kills a fig tree for not bearing figs, even though it was out of
season. Jesus must not be as smart as Christians would have us
believe, for he was retarded enough to do something this silly. You’d
think the son of god (god incarnate) would know that trees don’t bear
fruit in dry season. Mark 11:13

Luke 12:47 Jesus okays beating slaves.

Uncle Teddie:

Get used to the idea, else believe we crawled out of mud puddles, and if so,
get ready for the aliens which are likely on their way here--since there is a
great possibility some of them left the mud puddles of other planets before we
got our start here...

Anyway you cut it, don't look good...

Course, my rig and my antenna are not "christian", neither do they believe in
"mud puddle creatures"--they are in a heck of a predicament there...

John

"Uncle Ted" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 16:55:32 -0700, John Smith
wrote:


Jesus came to establish the rules for the "new testament", many of the old
rules were suspended... if Jesus had walked around with short hair, such
as became the style this century, he would have had stood out like a sore
thumb...

John

(From the Church of Theists Suck)

What Would Jesus Do?

Advocate child abuse and murder amongst many other cruelties.

Christians are always claiming, "he's the lamb", "our savior",
"the king of peace", "the embodiment of love", amongst the many other
names they associate with a loving, merciful nature. Jesus a nice
guy? Not in my book. Nor in any other person's who is capable of
compassion and rationality. Let's examine who the hell the Jesus
character really is. These verses will show not only is Jesus'
"loving" nature a joke but so are the Christians who worship him.
Jesus' real mission to come to earth:

Jesus says that he has come to destroy families by making family
members hate each other. He has "come not to send peace, but a
sword." Matthew 10:34

Jesus says, "Don't imagine that I came to bring peace on earth! No,
rather a sword lf you love your father, mother, sister, brother, more
than me, you are not worthy of being mine." The real beauty of this
verse is that Jesus demands people truly love him more then they love
their own family. I ask you how can we love someone that we can not
see or interact with? Love is an emotion pertaining to physical
existence not to faithful ideologies, yet God threatens you with Death
just because your love for your mother maybe stronger than your love
for him. Matthew 10:34

Families will be torn apart because of Jesus. "Brother shall deliver
up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children
shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to
death." Matthew 10:21

Jesus strongly approves of the law and the prophets. He hasn't the
slightest objection to the cruelties of the Old Testament. Matthew
5:17

Jesus advocates murder and death:

Jesus condemns entire cities to dreadful deaths and to the eternal
torment of hell because they didn't care for his preaching. Matthew
11:20

Jesus, whose clothes are dipped in blood, has a sharp sword sticking
out of his mouth. Thus attired, he treads the winepress of the wrath
of God. (The winepress is the actual press that humans shall be put
into so that we may be ground up.) Revelations 19:13-15

The beast and the false prophet are cast alive into a lake of fire.
The rest of us the unchosen will be killed with the sword of Jesus.
"An all the fowls were filled with their flesh." Revelations 19:20-21


Jesus says he is the only way to salvation yet he purposely
disillusions us so that we will go to hell:

Jesus explains that the reason he speaks in parables is so that no one
will understand him, "lest . . . they . . . should understand . . .
and should be converted, and I should heal them." Matthew 13:10-15

Jesus explains why he speaks in parables to confuse people so they
will go to hell. Mark 4:11-12

Jesus advocates child abuse:

Jesus is criticized by the Pharisees for not washing his hands before
eating. He defends himself by attacking them for not killing
disobedient children according to the commandment: "He that curseth
father or mother, let him die the death." Matthew 15:4-7

Abandon your wife and children for Jesus and he'll give your a big
reward. Jesus asks that his followers abandon their children to
follow him. To leave your child is abuse, it's called neglect, pure
and simple. Matthew 19:29

Jesus criticizes the Jews for not killing their disobedient children
according to Old Testament law. Mark 7:9

A few other things about Jesus:

Jesus says that those who have been less fortunate in this life will
have it even worse in the life to come. Mark 4:25

Jesus sends the devils into 2000 pigs, causing them to jump off a
cliff and be drowned in the sea. Clearly Jesus could have simply sent
the devils out, yet he chose instead to place them into pigs and kill
them. This is called animal abuse. Mark 5:12-13

Jesus kills a fig tree for not bearing figs, even though it was out of
season. Jesus must not be as smart as Christians would have us
believe, for he was retarded enough to do something this silly. You'd
think the son of god (god incarnate) would know that trees don't bear
fruit in dry season. Mark 11:13

Luke 12:47 Jesus okays beating slaves.

Garsh darn it, John. Now you went and did it. I don't know whether to strike
my chest three times and recite, "Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa, Mea Maxima Culpa",
or to bow five times toward the east and hope that Allah blesses (???) me
with several wives and a buggy whip. I suppose I could do both and top it
off by throwing a few bananas in front of the Buddha statue just in case.

No need to **** Jesus, Lennie, Allah and Buddha off in one fell swoop, eh?
That would surely send me to ARRL Hell in no time flat.

It is probably not necessary to have a Catholic Priest wave his hands over
my radios, though perhaps it 'may' give added life to the transistors. I
will instead defer and humbly bow to the Lennie God without whose blessings
we cannot proceed.

Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa, Mea Maxima Culpa






"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Lucifer:

You old hot devil you, the women have been asking around for you!

Really don't know huh?

He changed "an eye for an eye" to "turn the other cheek"...

He changed not being able to eat pork to now being able to eat it...
(someone needs to sneak some ham in the muslims food! They don't know
and haven't tried it yet... grin)

.... jews are still pi$$ed off about a lot of it, don't recognize Jesus as
the messiah, some will grant he bears prophet status...

.... but then, much of this doesn't have to do with amateur policy,
although it can't hurt to have a catholic priest bless your rig and
antenna!

John

On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 21:00:32 -0500, Lucifer wrote:

Now you went and done it...you done tole ole Wogie that he is, in a few
words, stupid...

"Your own lack of scholarship is clearly evident in the comments quoted"

Wogie gonna have to sit back and figger this one out. He got no
'scholarship' but from his Devry mail order Master Degree. Cost Wogie all of
$249.30 plus tax.

"If Saul were alive today, he would probably say "If Woger posts his
photo on Yahoo, it is a shame unto him."

Nice quote. Woger, however, would counter that Lloyd was behind this post.
Wascallly Wogie sees Lloyd behind every door, in every shadow. Wascally
Wogie has never been known for his intellect...

On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:30:50 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

Uncle Teddie:

Get used to the idea, else believe we crawled out of mud puddles,

What "idea" are you talking about?

and if so,
get ready for the aliens which are likely on their way here--since there is a
great possibility some of them left the mud puddles of other planets before we
got our start here...

There are a lot of things that are possible, but many of those
possibilities are highly unlikely.

Anyway you cut it, don't look good...

What don't look good?

Course, my rig and my antenna are not "christian", neither do they believe in
"mud puddle creatures"--they are in a heck of a predicament there...

What "predicament" are you talking about? You're not making any sense.

Uncle teddie:

Many things are highly improbable, I agree, such as evolution.

However, if you venture a religious belief in evolution, and then there
are millions of millions of planets out there near similar to earth, with
billions of billions of mud puddles on them--aliens become a given
probability.

John

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:23:09 -0400, Uncle Ted wrote:

On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:30:50 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

Uncle Teddie:

Get used to the idea, else believe we crawled out of mud puddles,

What "idea" are you talking about?

and if so,
get ready for the aliens which are likely on their way here--since there is a
great possibility some of them left the mud puddles of other planets before we
got our start here...

There are a lot of things that are possible, but many of those
possibilities are highly unlikely.

Anyway you cut it, don't look good...

What don't look good?

Course, my rig and my antenna are not "christian", neither do they believe in
"mud puddle creatures"--they are in a heck of a predicament there...

What "predicament" are you talking about? You're not making any sense.

George Orwell wrote:
In article
Cmdr Butt Cornholer wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That photo (IKYABWAI)


And, Roger
doesn't have long hair and unlike you has hair to shampoo on

a

daily basis.

Why are you shampooing your butt, wogie?



Why are you so concerned with another man's butt, Commander
Queero? And where above does it say he was?



It's so simple that if it has to be explained to you, then you're too
stupid to get it anyway, wogie.

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:26:59 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

Uncle teddie:

Many things are highly improbable, I agree, such as evolution.

However, if you venture a religious belief in evolution, and then there
are millions of millions of planets out there near similar to earth, with
billions of billions of mud puddles on them--aliens become a given
probability.

John

What does this have to do with what I originally posted about Jesus?
You're still not making any sense.

Uncle ted:

I am afraid you would have to have the ability to carry on a conversation
without me having to align all of my comments up to your comments which
prompted them. If you need to, go back, read your posts, read mine--in
sequential order, you should be able to figure it out... if not, we
probably should not be having this conversation in the first place...

I see that is the style you choose (alignment of each of my comments to
your counter-comments), and now, perhaps, I know why you need such a
style.

I am afraid you may have to choose others who you can "understand."

John

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 01:20:09 -0400, Uncle Ted wrote:

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:26:59 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

Uncle teddie:

Many things are highly improbable, I agree, such as evolution.

However, if you venture a religious belief in evolution, and then there
are millions of millions of planets out there near similar to earth, with
billions of billions of mud puddles on them--aliens become a given
probability.

John

What does this have to do with what I originally posted about Jesus?
You're still not making any sense.

Uncle Ted:

Let me try a simple approach for you. Since, by your own text, you
dismissed the possibility of Jesus, the ONLY other explanation currently
"on the board" is evolution. I accepted debate on what that all involves,
such as the existence of aliens, and moved to that platform... why would
you wish to go back and debate Jesus, an idea/possibility you have
dismissed. I simply don't know, could be here because of "God" and
awaiting an angel--or, could be here because of mud puddles and are
awaiting an alien... But, it is damn sure one or the other (well, there
are other possible reasons, but even fewer supporters of those...)

John

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 01:20:09 -0400, Uncle Ted wrote:

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:26:59 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

Uncle teddie:

Many things are highly improbable, I agree, such as evolution.

However, if you venture a religious belief in evolution, and then there
are millions of millions of planets out there near similar to earth, with
billions of billions of mud puddles on them--aliens become a given
probability.

John

What does this have to do with what I originally posted about Jesus?
You're still not making any sense.

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:42:54 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

Uncle ted:

I am afraid you would have to have the ability to carry on a conversation
without me having to align all of my comments up to your comments which
prompted them. If you need to, go back, read your posts, read mine--in
sequential order, you should be able to figure it out... if not, we
probably should not be having this conversation in the first place...

You're right. I can't figure out the ramblings of loon that's off of
his meds...

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:47:51 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

Uncle Ted:

Let me try a simple approach for you. Since, by your own text, you
dismissed the possibility of Jesus, the ONLY other explanation currently
"on the board" is evolution.

Wrong. I dismissed the bible and the version of Jesus that it depicts.
Whether or not such a person actually existed is another matter, and
it certainly doesn't have anything to do with evolution.

I accepted debate on what that all involves,
such as the existence of aliens, and moved to that platform... why would
you wish to go back and debate Jesus, an idea/possibility you have
dismissed. I simply don't know, could be here because of "God" and
awaiting an angel--or, could be here because of mud puddles and are
awaiting an alien... But, it is damn sure one or the other (well, there
are other possible reasons, but even fewer supporters of those...)

Go drink a bottle of Jim Beam with your medication. Maybe you'll come
up with some more of those "possibilities". Better yet, maybe you'll
keel over from alcohol poisoning and fall into one of those mud
puddles you mentioned...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 06:46:46 +0200, Fritz Wuehler Secwet Hairy Woger wrote:
:
: That still doesn't change the fact Roger has short hair, dumbass!
:

Exhibit one is the photo which Woger first posted to Yahoo's singles
group. It is currently available at
http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/9...8mq08030cb.jpg

A small version can also be found at
http://the-forum.us/nimbusters/forum/forum.php?board=10

Clearly, everyone on Usenet and on the web agree that that's a photo
of Woger, and that Woger had long hair at the time the photo was
taken.

The little, animated man which runs across the top of the Nimbuster's
web page and pees on Woger's photo is probably not due to Woger's
popularity with his peers.

Indeed he *is* like a slinky ...



====================
"If a man have long hair it is a shame unto him." -- Paul, I Cor. 11:14


====================
"Wrong again, FATASS, I told Pammy to go **** herself after she called
here, all upset. I guyess it was because she was behind giving the
black system admin she has a blowjob in the server room and giving one
to her dog." -- AB8MQ in message-id


====================
"Roger hasn't recieved 'repeat visits with the chief of police'. You
ar a liar. He isn't about to get another one either, dumbass." -- Secwet
Woger in message-id b14c37cf833370abc4122a241ccf54c4@melontraffickers .com

====================
In message XLSKB3LR38448.4326273148@anonymous, Secwet Woger dazzled
his readers with his logic skills by saying: "The fact is you still
can't disprove I've never been to your workplace."

====================
In message , Secwet
Woger bragged about his Extra Class examination fame with the claim:
"If poor chronic alcoholic and drug abuser Gopher face wouldn't drink
so much because he is womanless, he could spell 'retested', 'dumb' and
'Rogie' and could actually pass an Extra license exam."

It is an interesting site to say the least. I don't understand why half of
the comments are green though.
Why is that?

"Stagger Lee" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 06:46:46 +0200, Fritz Wuehler Secwet Hairy Woger
wrote:
:
: That still doesn't change the fact Roger has short hair, dumbass!
:

Exhibit one is the photo which Woger first posted to Yahoo's singles
group. It is currently available at
http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/9...8mq08030cb.jpg

A small version can also be found at
http://the-forum.us/nimbusters/forum/forum.php?board=10

Clearly, everyone on Usenet and on the web agree that that's a photo
of Woger, and that Woger had long hair at the time the photo was
taken.

The little, animated man which runs across the top of the Nimbuster's
web page and pees on Woger's photo is probably not due to Woger's
popularity with his peers.

Indeed he *is* like a slinky ...



====================
"If a man have long hair it is a shame unto him." -- Paul, I Cor. 11:14


====================
"Wrong again, FATASS, I told Pammy to go **** herself after she called
here, all upset. I guyess it was because she was behind giving the
black system admin she has a blowjob in the server room and giving one
to her dog." -- AB8MQ in message-id


====================
"Roger hasn't recieved 'repeat visits with the chief of police'. You
ar a liar. He isn't about to get another one either, dumbass." -- Secwet
Woger in message-id b14c37cf833370abc4122a241ccf54c4@melontraffickers .com

====================
In message XLSKB3LR38448.4326273148@anonymous, Secwet Woger dazzled
his readers with his logic skills by saying: "The fact is you still
can't disprove I've never been to your workplace."

====================
In message , Secwet
Woger bragged about his Extra Class examination fame with the claim:
"If poor chronic alcoholic and drug abuser Gopher face wouldn't drink
so much because he is womanless, he could spell 'retested', 'dumb' and
'Rogie' and could actually pass an Extra license exam."