Michael:

No michael, you are just a character assassin without a victim...

You are just a guy telling us you got all the facts, don't collect any
data--just listen to you--yep, love that "scientific method" of yours...
you sitting in a group of girly-men and they are hanging on your every
word... hope nothing knocks you out of your element, you will look as lost
as here...

John

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:02:52 -0400, Michael Coslo wrote:



Dave Heil wrote:

John Smith wrote:

Dave:

"Jims' points" are mostly a ploy to inject points which are not even at
issue.


Yeah, that sneaky Jim--always working a ploy.

On BPL? Well there are a lot of test blocks where that is being
technically tested, evaluated and data is being recorded. I don't think
one needs futurist papers, Sylvia Browne, or some hams opinion--technical
data will make it a reality or not... that final data is not available
yet... I don't think a bunch of aging hams are going to block a
multi-billion dollar a year industry, if it is technically feasibly, I
know some of them think so, but rational men viewing them only grin
behind
their backs--but, as long as they only pay attention to their "net
buddy's" they will not have to suffer the embarrassment of coping with
reality...


A bunch of aging hams who are federally licensed trumps Part 15 users
each and every time. Some of those supposed rational, grinning men have
had to yank their BPL systems down because of interference.

Or, perhaps there is something of deep meaning and paramount importance
which I am failing to see here?


"Since you purport to have a ee degree,

Right. And I'm a pie-eyed greepus!


you might explain how some
signals held below 300 KHz could possibly serve a number of users (say
in a neighborhood) at 3 megabaud (or higher) rates?"

There you go.

Easy, Dave! Just plug a really fast modem into it!

- Mike KB3EIA -