LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Report Post  
Old August 21st 05, 06:15 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:

and why is it a problem I thought CW always got through, yet it needs protecting from Pactor?


No, CW does *not* "always get through".


No mode always gets through. There are some times when Morse
Code gets through and other available modes do not. This plain,
simple fact has been misquoted and perverted by some.

Assuming the robot listens before sending well it looks like anything else I hear about in HF


No, robots do *not* listen before transmitting which is against the regs and is the crux of the problem.


There's also the issue of what constitutes "listening". A robot
may listen for another Pactor III signal, yet not for a PSK31
or Morse Code signal.

How much of a listen is long enough, and on how much on either
side of the frequency?

A human operator causing QRM is either lousy operating practice or an accident, a robot blindly causing QRM via it's inherent
design is illegal.


There's also the 24/7 nature of the robots.

One solution might be to come up with a robot which tunes
around it's frequency before transmitting.


Yup. And maybe sends "QRL?" in Morse Code before it opens up.

There's one for you code-writers to chew on.


The situation is somewhat like the dawn of the FM repeater
era on the ham bands. A typical ham FM repeater essentially
takes over two frequencies (input and output)in its coverage
area.

There was a time when a ham repeater required a special license
with special callsign, and the application for it involved a
pretty detailed description of the setup, its operation, etc.,
with things like HAAT specified. Even today we have repeater
coordination.

But VHF/UHF coverage is fairly predictable and consistent. A
typical ham VHF/UHF repeater covers a few hundred square miles
except during unusual conditions. Even a moderately powered HF
station can cover millions of square miles.

The "regulation by bandwidth" proposal has some good basic
concepts, but it needs some serious work before it is ready
for prime time. The fact that so many different groups are
opposed to it, and so few in favor, shows that it needs rework.

73 de Jim, N2EY

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem from pager transmitters Photoman General 5 December 26th 04 08:27 PM
WKMI sounds owful what's the problem? Robert L. Herman Broadcasting 45 January 4th 04 06:42 PM
Bizzare Car AM Radio Reception Problem KP Broadcasting 7 December 21st 03 06:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017