| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#16
August 22nd 05, 03:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
wrote: The "regulation by bandwidth" proposal has some good basic concepts, but it needs some serious work before it is ready for prime time. The fact that so many different groups are opposed to it, and so few in favor, shows that it needs rework. 73 de Jim, N2EY I agree completely ... If I am elected to the ARRL Board, I will work with the various interest groups to find ways to modify the proposal so that it will better address the issues and concerns that have been voiced. It will require some reasonable compromise to arrive a plan that at least a significant majority of people can accept. It's probably totally unrealistic to believe that it's possible to please 100% of the ham population, but the goal should be to achieve a MUCH broader consensus. If a preponderance of hams from the various interest groups can say "It's not perfect in my ideal world, but I can sign up for that." we've probably reached the best possible solution. We're not there yet ... 73, Carl - wk3c http://home.ptd.net/~wk3c |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem from pager transmitters | General | |||
| WKMI sounds owful what's the problem? | Broadcasting | |||
| Bizzare Car AM Radio Reception Problem | Broadcasting | |||
Threaded Mode
