About Us

September 10th 05, 09:38 PM

an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
an Old friend wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

quoting you stevie
To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the
participants at
the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better,
then have
at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want
something
shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I
don't
waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of
consequence.
YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE
subject
to change!

Unquote

the last sentence is particularly ilumanting

wrote:
wrote:
cut

---------------------
Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a
case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking."

Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments
might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y
requires that it be perceived as such."
--------------------

Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to
have the courts decide.

and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I
decide if it was threatening

It would appear that way.

But there's always a double-standard at work in this newsgripe, so the
usual rules of logic don't always work.

I wonder if if realy the NG do we have any eveidence that lgic ever
works on stevie

BTW did you catch Stevie that he never cliamed to be an expert on
anything?

Yeh, not worth arguing his obvious contradictions.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Menu

About Us