Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...
cut

A sensible comment from 'an old friend'....again I am amazed....wait a
minute.....'an old friend' recognizing Glenn Baxter is in need of a
rubber
room......right off the bat, eh? Perhaps a bit of experience 'old
friend'?

even agre with you and get flamed for it

OTOH I did not mention a rubber room either, simple mental health work
very few people are need of the rubber room. I have no evidence that
K1MAN would even benifit from one let alone need it

I take it then you agree with me that K1MAN is not much of an issue for
the FCC then

Dan/W4NTI


Your ability to understand is obviously defective. Let me try again.

I think K1MAN has mental problems. As you apparantly do also.

K1MAN's own words say so so of course I do, but I don't think that is
reason to confine him. Indeed I am very slow to suggest that anyperson
should be confined

I think MAN is a discrace to Ham Radio, and should be removed for several
infractions of the rules and regulations.

and I have not heard the allegation let alone the proof of it.

the realy serious matter are Control ops issues, and allegation of
interference in H&W traffic but the latter as presented by Hans looks
more like a missing understanding than something calling for banning
him form the service, prehaps a fine.

I am HAPPY not to hear his "opinions" on his "First ever Ham Radio Call in
Talk SHow".

and that sound like a personal problem to me, after all it is clear you
are never open to opinions that vary from your own

Dan/W4NTI

John Smith wrote:
There is little doubt Baxter has several contacts (leaks, informants,
etc.) inside the FCC. The commission continues to be powerless
to rectify its internal security problems. Commercial interests have
taken full advantage of FCC informants, and one can be certain
over the years that Baxter has developed several credible sources
of information inside the FCC. Just one case in point. Two
commission employees in the Northeast/DC areas would become
aware of imminent CB enforcement actions. They would email
others specific details about the imminent enforcement effort, and
worse yet, would discuss it on ham repeaters. Within hours, illegal
CB equipment was pulled from shelves, and local freeband
frequencies would go quiet. Legal CB channels, area ham
repeaters, and email would be full of specific details of the
pending enforcement actions. The same two commission employees
served as valuable sources of information for commercial
interests, allowing them lead time to prepare for FCC inspections.
Overheard a ARRL official once say he guessed there were dozens
of reliable sources of information inside the FCC.




Care to site a source for those statements?

Not true, I dug out an FCC rule book from late 80's and there was a
Special Services Division in the Private Radio Bureau.

Todd N9OGL