RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   FS: Yaesu FT-530 - 350/obo (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/79158-re-fs-yaesu-ft-530-350-obo.html)

AB8MQ October 5th 05 09:16 PM

FS: Yaesu FT-530 - 350/obo
 
wrote:
I and the person who owns it are both higher classed LICENSED hams.

OH BOY, am I ****ing impressed with you. Shove
your overpriced radio up your ass, blowhard!

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[email protected] October 5th 05 11:18 PM


LLoyd Davies, N0VFP posting as AB8MQ wrote:
wrote:
I and the person who owns it are both higher classed LICENSED hams.

OH BOY, am I ****ing impressed with you. Shove
your overpriced radio up your ass, blowhard!


What do you care, Lardass Davies, you can't get on HF! You are too
stupid and lazy to learn morse code or the required theory.


Robert Kubichek October 5th 05 11:27 PM

wrote:
LLoyd Davies, N0VFP posting as AB8MQ wrote:

wrote:

I and the person who owns it are both higher classed LICENSED hams.


OH BOY, am I ****ing impressed with you. Shove
your overpriced radio up your ass, blowhard!



What do you care, Lardass Davies, you can't get on HF! You are too
stupid and lazy to learn morse code or the required theory.

So what?? if he wanted to be on HF, he would study for the code part, as
would I. The item being talked about has nothing to do with HF, wrong
bands. If you think it does, you should go back and study some more.
Calling people names shows how imature you really are.
--
Bob N9LVU

[email protected] October 5th 05 11:38 PM

More excuses for your inability to learn? Why would anybody want an old
radio like the FT 530 to begin with. You should read and learn about
today's much better engineered radios.


an_old_friend October 6th 05 01:07 AM


wrote:
More excuses for your inability to learn? Why would anybody want an old
radio like the FT 530 to begin with. You should read and learn about
today's much better engineered radios.


well someone might want a cheap radio with HF access as part of it

Indeed Now is not the time to dumping such after all we all will have
real and fair access to HF in a few months


October 6th 05 02:09 AM

An this, in a nutshell, is the reason Amateur Radio is in peril of loosing
spectrum today.

You manage to personify the problem precisely.

Keep up the great work!

wrote in message
oups.com...
More excuses for your inability to learn? Why would anybody want an old
radio like the FT 530 to begin with. You should read and learn about
today's much better engineered radios.




an old friend October 6th 05 02:19 AM


wrote:
An this, in a nutshell, is the reason Amateur Radio is in peril of loosing
spectrum today.


are we realy sure the joker has a Ham license at all

You manage to personify the problem precisely.

Keep up the great work!

wrote in message
oups.com...
More excuses for your inability to learn? Why would anybody want an old
radio like the FT 530 to begin with. You should read and learn about
today's much better engineered radios.



an old friend October 6th 05 03:45 AM


wrote:
Agreed. This is why people like us are leaving the hobby. And why we
are selling this equipment.

When HF turns into CB with little spark between the ears, then it's
time to pull the plug. Me personally, I've said good bye to HF years
ago when the band conditions and QRM stomped out QRP operation. Maybe
someday I'll buy another one when I'm over 500 miles from the nearest
metropolis. Till then, what goes on in this thread is a perfect
example of why a code requirement should still be maintained.


don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out

the Ars clearly doesn't jerk like you


[email protected] October 6th 05 03:53 AM

From email as I only invited serious responses.:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Robert Kubichek ]
I think you owe me an apology, I was NOT criticizing your post.. I was
trying to prepare you for a dissapointment.... However, good luck if
you sell it for more than what I stated.... I know you will need it..

By the way, I have been a ham op for over 10 years...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Robert,

As I replied in private and now in public. I do NOT owe you an
apology. Come to think of it, I do not OWE you ANYTHING. The only
disappointment here is that you never upgraded your license apparently
(from your response). Not that I care. Nor want to encourage you to
upgrade. Frankly, I couldn't give a **** less what you do with your
operating license and equipment infofar as it does not affect another
radio operator or cause a public nuisance which obviously USENET has
become a part of. The pity that I received from you was left at the
post box for some other sucker to take.

Now before you hit reply, it seems that you're a somewhat fair minded
individual as you stood up to the blatant flamers for which I applaude
you for. That being said, I know what I'm doing when it comes to
equipment. You do see the "OBO" on the subject? I did intentionally
set it high because I am looking to come down on the price. But that
would be too obvious wouldn't it. So here I am spelling it out for you
and the rest of the people who read the thread.

OR BEST OFFER = OBO.

Ahh, now that's off my chest. enjoy. if you find yourself with a few
extra coins in your pocket, maybe a new toy would come in handy. Could
even attach it to Echolink or use a Echolink equipped repeater and talk
across the country. Great for the kids who are in college (give them
incentive) or the YL traveling around town. Toss it in the camper and
use it when you go hunting (assuming that you have a mobile rig in the
camper). And again, THE PRICE IS NEGOTIABLE.

Regards


[email protected] October 6th 05 03:54 AM

*shrug* nothing but QRM...

bitches.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com