RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   FAQ (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/80306-faq.html)

Polymath November 19th 05 06:36 AM

FAQ
 
You are, "Polymath", AICMFP.

Joking apart, well said that man!

wrote:
This kind of continual foul language,.....
Do the regulars of this group realise that it is becoming legendary for
everything Usenet was supposed not to be? Surely it is possible to have a
civilised debate without this stuff?



[email protected] November 19th 05 06:45 AM

FAQ
 
Jock wrote:

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 05:37:09 +1100, wrote:
This kind of continual foul language, and the anti-M3 and anti-RSGB
attitude (not to mention the "wisdom" portrayed in sig files) are some of
the reasons why amateurs will not be taken seriously over the BPL issue.
Do the regulars of this group realise that it is becoming legendary for
everything Usenet was supposed not to be? Surely it is possible to have a
civilised debate without this stuff?


Then sod off back where you came from, top-poster. If you don't like
foul language, why do you quote it and cross-post it?

If you don't like this newsgroup, why do you subscribe to it?


I suppose - awful fascination. Moth drawn to a candle flame? (Flame...
geditt?) I think you're one of the better ones so sorry to offend by top
posting. But seriously, this NG and the hobby are becoming famous for what its
proponents surely don't really desire.

--

73 de Jock.


73 indeed.


[email protected] November 19th 05 06:53 PM

FAQ
 
The Magnum wrote:

....(snip)
Lol, great command of the English language there. I wonder if his morse is
as bad........
(snip)


......****. your **** now trying to say Amateurs above the entry level
never cause interference or mess about sometimes on the air.... b-ll-cks.





Dana December 9th 05 09:13 PM

FAQ
 
I enjoyed the code at 1 time, but not anymore.

On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, The Magnum wrote:


"Dana" wrote in message
.com...
The mistake the FCC made was dropping the code requirment down to 5 wpm.
Lots of nivices squeeked under the wire.


What is this absurd fascination with Morse Code? Wouldnt you rather just
talk to people? I know all about the arguements about it getting through
when all else fails but is it really life and death?? If i cant get through
on the radio I use a Phone or the Internet. After all its just a hobby.
Besides, doesnt all that dot dot dot.. dash dash dash give you a headache
after a while??
Dont get me wrong, im not having a go at Amateurs im just asking the
question.. why is it so important?

Regards,
Graham




Dana December 9th 05 09:51 PM

FAQ
 
You know what? I can't copy CW as fast as I used to either. I got into
radio before some of you was born.


Steveo December 10th 05 05:39 AM

FAQ
 
Dana wrote:
You know what? I can't copy CW

Not surprising, you can't quote the text you're responding to either, top X
posting ****wit.

Paul Burridge December 10th 05 11:41 AM

FAQ
 

What is this absurd fascination with Morse Code? Wouldnt you rather just
talk to people? I know all about the arguements about it getting through
when all else fails but is it really life and death?? If i cant get through
on the radio I use a Phone or the Internet. After all its just a hobby.
Besides, doesnt all that dot dot dot.. dash dash dash give you a headache
after a while??
Dont get me wrong, im not having a go at Amateurs im just asking the
question.. why is it so important?


It has its own abiding fascination for some of us. And if you get
selfish idiots on SSB encroaching on the CW end of bands, you can blow
them away without difficulty and still carry on an uninterrupted QSO
with fellow CWers.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd" - William Blake

The Magnum December 10th 05 01:36 PM

FAQ
 

"Paul Burridge" k wrote
in message ...

What is this absurd fascination with Morse Code? Wouldnt you rather

just
talk to people? I know all about the arguements about it getting

through
when all else fails but is it really life and death?? If i cant get

through
on the radio I use a Phone or the Internet. After all its just a hobby.
Besides, doesnt all that dot dot dot.. dash dash dash give you a

headache
after a while??
Dont get me wrong, im not having a go at Amateurs im just asking the
question.. why is it so important?


It has its own abiding fascination for some of us. And if you get
selfish idiots on SSB encroaching on the CW end of bands, you can blow
them away without difficulty and still carry on an uninterrupted QSO
with fellow CWers.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd" - William Blake


Then that's fine for you and your CW friends but is it really the top goal
all Amateurs set out to achieve... to go dah dah dah dit dit dit dah dah
dah? Don't you also enjoy talking to distance stations with your voice too?
I agree that the part of the spectrum allocated to Morse should be left for
Morse and those who wish to use Morse should have a slightly different level
of licence/callsign to acknowledge this but it seems its always but "always"
levelled at us with any discussion about seemingly low licensed
intermediates/M3's/general class that unless your an extra class/advanced
you are some sort of trailer park scum. Not for one minute am I saying you
say this but its the general impression most get from some "alleged" full
licence holders in these newsgroups.

Regards and Happy Christmas,
Graham

--
_._. _... ._. ._ _.. .. _ _ _

Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life...

73's - Graham (www.open-channel.co.uk)



Paul Burridge December 11th 05 01:11 AM

FAQ
 
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:36:30 -0000, "The Magnum"
wrote:

Then that's fine for you and your CW friends but is it really the top goal
all Amateurs set out to achieve... to go dah dah dah dit dit dit dah dah
dah? Don't you also enjoy talking to distance stations with your voice too?


No. I know that sounds odd but it's true. Can't really explain it, I
guess. :-|
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd" - William Blake

Dana December 11th 05 04:16 AM

FAQ
 
Well, not that old now, LOL. 49.

On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Walt Davidson wrote:

On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:51:41 -0500, Dana wrote:

You know what? I can't copy CW as fast as I used to either. I got into
radio before some of you was born.


Well, before most of the 6-year-old M3s, anyway.

73 de G3NYY

--
Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com