|
Brain has Stevie paid up on the bet he made a few years ago
Steve Robeson K4YZ Jan 29 2003, 10:46 am show options
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy From: (Steve Robeson K4YZ) - Find messages by this author Date: 29 Jan 2003 15:45:31 GMT Local: Wed, Jan 29 2003 10:45 am Subject: Lennie, You're OUTTED, Now Get Over It Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse Subject: Lennie, You're OUTTED, Now Get Over It From: (Brian) Date: 1/28/03 11:56 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Not at all. I would like to see Lennie silenced becasue he has lied repeatedly and makes outrageous and unsupported claims against Amateur Radio as a whole. You have lied repeatedly. Then you are free to post the quotes where I lied, Brian. As a matter of fact, I DARE you to do it. Len's opinion of the cult of amateur radio isn't far off the mark. It's so far off the mark as to be laughable. That you think it isn't makes me rethink the "concilliatory" language I've been trying to take with you. My bust. I've given a long list of the people that you incessantly badger whenever they might come on to the group. Your list, as I responded to earlier, was in error. That argument is over with, Brian. There are other IMMEDIATE issues that need to be and should be addressed, but they aren't. I ahve introduced and reintorduced them, but they fall on deaf ears, so it shall be...I am not another "Vipul" who will damn all Amateur Radio because it won't meet MY needs. Do you believe that the FCC, through a body of rules titled "Part 97" governs amateur radio? Where in the blue blazes did you get a questuion like that in response to the quoted paragraph, Brian? The FCC's jurisdiction over Amateur Radio has NEVER been in contest. This is some dodge that your buddy like to try and trun from time to time. No one in this forum has ever "denied", "disclaimed", alluded to" or otherwise attempted to suggest that the FCC is NOT the governing agency for civil radio in the United States. I DARE you to provide ONE quote where ANYONE in this forum has stated otherwise. We ought to be able to eliminate the code exam for free American amateurs. There are Amateurs imprisoned over Morse Code? I know Flippo and Burton are in jail for QRMing and unlicensed operation, but WHO is in jail over Code? I disagree, but does there need to be organized support to maintain an unnecessary and arbitrary requirement? Please cite for me some known law that is enforced WITHOUT "organized support", Brain. I can't think of a single law that gets enacted and enforced WITHOUT "organized support", and I certainly can't think of any law that ever got revoked or deleted without "organized support". The Bill of Rights bears witness to same, espeicially the 18th and 21st amendments. Our government may take years to eliminate the code exam. Brian...copy this post, including headers, and save it. I am willing to wager $100.00 US Dollars (one hundred), that the Federal Communications Commission shall, either on thier own volition or acting on a duly submitted petition, within 180 days of the ratification of any changes to ITU S25.5, delete Morse Code testing as a requirement for ANY class of Amateur Radio license in the United States. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ breaking to KB9RQZ text looks like Stevie Owes you 100 Dollars US has he paid up? backk to stevie ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Unless they allow the VEC to misinterpret Part 97 and just stop testing. How can they "misinterpret" Part 97? What part of Part 97 as it presently exists lends itself to "misinterpret(ation)" such that VE's could even remotely consider NOT complying with examinations for Element 1? Your zeal only exposes you for what you are. Intolerant of the lying and deceitful? M-o-v-e On! You condone liars and the deceitful? Sorry for what? Lennie insists on some "lodge hall" mentality, Yup. He's wrong. insists that Amateur Radio does NOT provide a public service, So, he's wrong. That's what I've been TRYING to tell you! and has made countless assertions that are untrue and proven false with ease. So do you. Quotes, please... So he has proved....what? He's said that we're full of OF's that cling to the past. If you can't see that, then you're part of the problem. Let's see...."clings to the past"... Hmmmm....I certainly AM active on CW on HF...But Wait! There's More! EME...(building a station)...airborne telemetery for DASH surveillence, mentoring, ATV... Whew...Could go on, but why...??? I've helped dozens of NEW hams get on the air, almost all of which have been Post 1991 and post "Restructuring" licensees. No one in any club I belong to (three) even remotely supports "clinging to the past". Nothing I read in ANY periodical suggests that Amateur Radio "cling to the past" other than the usual historical interest expressed by ANY group in it's development. Every major periodical is ripe with new technology and techniques articles. Nothing, Brian... Now, Please provide the requested verifications of YOUR assertions of lies on my part. We'll wait right here. Steve, K4YZ |
Brain has Stevie paid up on the bet he made a few years ago
an old friend wrote: Steve Robeson K4YZ Jan 29 2003, 10:46 am show options Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy From: (Steve Robeson K4YZ) - Find messages by this author Date: 29 Jan 2003 15:45:31 GMT Local: Wed, Jan 29 2003 10:45 am Subject: Lennie, You're OUTTED, Now Get Over It Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse Subject: Lennie, You're OUTTED, Now Get Over It From: (Brian) Date: 1/28/03 11:56 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Not at all. I would like to see Lennie silenced becasue he has lied repeatedly and makes outrageous and unsupported claims against Amateur Radio as a whole. You have lied repeatedly. Then you are free to post the quotes where I lied, Brian. As a matter of fact, I DARE you to do it. Len's opinion of the cult of amateur radio isn't far off the mark. It's so far off the mark as to be laughable. That you think it isn't makes me rethink the "concilliatory" language I've been trying to take with you. My bust. I've given a long list of the people that you incessantly badger whenever they might come on to the group. Your list, as I responded to earlier, was in error. That argument is over with, Brian. There are other IMMEDIATE issues that need to be and should be addressed, but they aren't. I ahve introduced and reintorduced them, but they fall on deaf ears, so it shall be...I am not another "Vipul" who will damn all Amateur Radio because it won't meet MY needs. Do you believe that the FCC, through a body of rules titled "Part 97" governs amateur radio? Where in the blue blazes did you get a questuion like that in response to the quoted paragraph, Brian? The FCC's jurisdiction over Amateur Radio has NEVER been in contest. This is some dodge that your buddy like to try and trun from time to time. No one in this forum has ever "denied", "disclaimed", alluded to" or otherwise attempted to suggest that the FCC is NOT the governing agency for civil radio in the United States. I DARE you to provide ONE quote where ANYONE in this forum has stated otherwise. We ought to be able to eliminate the code exam for free American amateurs. There are Amateurs imprisoned over Morse Code? I know Flippo and Burton are in jail for QRMing and unlicensed operation, but WHO is in jail over Code? I disagree, but does there need to be organized support to maintain an unnecessary and arbitrary requirement? Please cite for me some known law that is enforced WITHOUT "organized support", Brain. I can't think of a single law that gets enacted and enforced WITHOUT "organized support", and I certainly can't think of any law that ever got revoked or deleted without "organized support". The Bill of Rights bears witness to same, espeicially the 18th and 21st amendments. Our government may take years to eliminate the code exam. Brian...copy this post, including headers, and save it. I am willing to wager $100.00 US Dollars (one hundred), that the Federal Communications Commission shall, either on thier own volition or acting on a duly submitted petition, within 180 days of the ratification of any changes to ITU S25.5, delete Morse Code testing as a requirement for ANY class of Amateur Radio license in the United States. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ breaking to KB9RQZ text looks like Stevie Owes you 100 Dollars US has he paid up? backk to stevie ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Unless they allow the VEC to misinterpret Part 97 and just stop testing. How can they "misinterpret" Part 97? What part of Part 97 as it presently exists lends itself to "misinterpret(ation)" such that VE's could even remotely consider NOT complying with examinations for Element 1? Your zeal only exposes you for what you are. Intolerant of the lying and deceitful? M-o-v-e On! You condone liars and the deceitful? Sorry for what? Lennie insists on some "lodge hall" mentality, Yup. He's wrong. insists that Amateur Radio does NOT provide a public service, So, he's wrong. That's what I've been TRYING to tell you! and has made countless assertions that are untrue and proven false with ease. So do you. Quotes, please... So he has proved....what? He's said that we're full of OF's that cling to the past. If you can't see that, then you're part of the problem. Let's see...."clings to the past"... Hmmmm....I certainly AM active on CW on HF...But Wait! There's More! EME...(building a station)...airborne telemetery for DASH surveillence, mentoring, ATV... Whew...Could go on, but why...??? I've helped dozens of NEW hams get on the air, almost all of which have been Post 1991 and post "Restructuring" licensees. No one in any club I belong to (three) even remotely supports "clinging to the past". Nothing I read in ANY periodical suggests that Amateur Radio "cling to the past" other than the usual historical interest expressed by ANY group in it's development. Every major periodical is ripe with new technology and techniques articles. Nothing, Brian... Now, Please provide the requested verifications of YOUR assertions of lies on my part. We'll wait right here. Steve, K4YZ ----------------------------------------- Steve, since I want no mail from you coming to my home address, you may send the lost $100 wager to the TEN-Land QSL Buro. It is fitting that you make the donation to the very people you denigrate and call "ZEROES." Best of Luck. bb |
Brain and Markie Struggling Again......
|
Quote:
The Man In The Maze QRV at Baboquivari Peak, AZ |
Quote:
The Man in the Maze QRV from Baboquivari Peak, AZ |
Brain has Stevie paid up on the bet he made a few years ago
Iitoi wrote: Wrote: Steve, since I want no mail from you coming to my home address, you may send the lost $100 wager to the TEN-Land QSL Buro. It is fitting that you make the donation to the very people you denigrate and call "ZEROES." Best of Luck. bb Having seen his "style" here the past several weeks, my wager is that Steve's prepared numerous escape routes with wiggle room to easily welch on this one. Perhaps YOU would care to substantiate the "wager" that they allege, meeting even some small smidgen of validity? Care to show where the wager was accepted and agreeded upon? Steve, K4YZ |
Brain has Stevie paid up on the bet he made a few years ago
Iitoi wrote: Wrote: Steve, since I want no mail from you coming to my home address, you may send the lost $100 wager to the TEN-Land QSL Buro. It is fitting that you make the donation to the very people you denigrate and call "ZEROES." Best of Luck. bb Having seen his "style" here the past several weeks, my wager is that Steve's prepared numerous escape routes with wiggle room to easily welch on this one. The Man In The Maze QRV at Baboquivari Peak, AZ -- Iitoi He is not to be trusted with even small amounts of truth. |
Brain has Stevie paid up on the bet he made a few years ago
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:17:38 +0000, Iitoi
wrote: K4YZ Wrote: First of all, no wager was ever "made". In order for.......... Secondly, if Y O U ........ Lastly, even if we HAD made a "wager" ........... Did I call that one right, or what!!!!!!!! stevie is always full of wiggle room and lies The Man in the Maze QRV from Baboquivari Peak, AZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Brain and Markie Struggling Again......
On 1 Nov 2005 07:58:19 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: an old friend wrote: Steve Robeson K4YZ Jan 29 2003, 10:46 am show options Now, Please provide the requested verifications of YOUR assertions of lies on my part. We'll wait right here. Steve, since I want no mail from you coming to my home address, you may send the lost $100 wager to the TEN-Land QSL Buro. It is fitting that you make the donation to the very people you denigrate and call "ZEROES." Best of Luck. bb Sorry, Brain...Several issues. First of all, no wager was ever "made". In order for a wager to take place, once person has to make it then the other accept it. Had Markie been honest (yeah...like THAT'S going to happen....) he'd have gone on to point out that you never "accepted" the wager... welching again Secondly, if Y O U were honest (again, about as unlikely as my Britney fantasies...) Y O U would have admitted that you never "accepted the wager. You ignored it. now you admit to adultry (in the christain not legal sense Stevie being a married man Lastly, even if we HAD made a "wager" it would be a felony for you to receive the wager via an agent across state lines...Again, further demonstration of your propensity to violate the law. Not that that fact surprises anyone. you are the felon for solicting the bet accros State lines Stevie Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com