Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Day 8 - 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments?
From: "Bill Sohl" on Thurs 17 Nov 2005 00:55
wrote in message Bill Sohl wrote: wrote in message an old friend wrote: wrote: Bill Sohl wrote: Truth is, however, that if there was anything that could have been described as new, even if it wasn't compelling, odds are we'd have heard it already via ARRL (QST), Len A., or someone else. I don't think anyone at ARRL is reading all the comments. I suspect that Chris Imlay has a hard copy of every comment filed which he has already reviewed. If his law firm is any good they WILL have ALL of them for reference. :-) Len isn't a reliable source. Tsk, tsk, tsk...Jimmie is being nasty again. :-) Despite his claim that he read and understood all the comments, he didn't know that someone else was reading all the comments too, and posting the results online for all to see. Tsk, tsk, tsk...Joe Speroni's website is "official" even though he is an extremely-biased PRO-CODE advocate? Even though the URL was on the first page of the comments, he missed it completely. To those of us accessing the FCC ECFS as our only immediate source of information on Docket filings, the Comments are NOT on "pages" but are filed according to date. Didn't you forget the "IMHO" in regard to your opinion of Len's analysis. Jimmie NEVER forgets, Bill. He is like an effluent. :-) Jimmie is the "renowned amateur historian" in here, by his own admission. He is working mightily to be Law Giver. :-) Jimmie is so highly biased on issues that he defies classes, beyond Class C, even beyond Class F. :-) Ho hum... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
DX test Results | Broadcasting | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave |