About Us

November 12th 05, 05:18 PM

wrote:
wrote:
From: K4YZ on Nov 11, 4:06 am

wrote:
From: on Nov 10, 4:41 pm

Interesting that after having had his nose rubbed in his own
numbers,

Len

changes style and format of his "scorecard" series of
posts and threads...Trying to hide the facts, as usual...The FACTS that
those comments Jim was refering to DON'T support

Len's

opinion as
being in the majority.

Len's own "scorecard" shows his opinion (complete elimination
of all Morse Code testing for any class of FCC-issued amateur radio
license)
to be in the minority

yes it did

but majoity support for nocode general, and the coment show no reason
for coded extra and a nocode general

indeed the coment don't address why we need to have an extra class at
all but that was outside what the FCC was discussing
cut

It appears that Len wished to avoide comment and discussion,
and wanted a thread containing only his scorecard.

yes he did want that . It is his right to want it
cut

Irrelevant.

That ratio began to change from the date of notice
in the Federal Register that the NPRM Comment period had
begun on 31 August 2005. The tallies can be verified by
anyone reading all 3,760 filings in WT Docket 05-235 as of
the close of ECFS updates on 10 November 2005.

Someone else did read them, and came up with a different
result than Len.

no doubt, and no supruse I am sure to anyone but you and no doubt if I
read em did my own count i would come up yet another figure

It should be noted that the official Comment period on NPRM
05-143 ENDED on 31 October. The Reply to Comments period is
still officially OPEN until Monday, 14 November 2005, as
stated in the Federal Register of 31 August 2005. Among the
9 official Replies to Comments (the other 48 are unofficial
Comments), all of them are FOR the NPRM. Those who bother
to look at the many tally postings I made will see the trend
of opinion changing weekly.

The final result is what matters.

to you

the FCC can glean data from the ebb and flow of the results

the FCC could choose to glean data through the use of Tarrot cards if
it chosee

you do not decide what matters. in the end the FCC does, tile then we
may speculate and deabte as we choose
the R&O when it is realesed is what matters

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ?	RHF	Shortwave	5	November 6th 05 04:52 AM
Is this voltage doubler different?	Mike Silva	Homebrew	16	February 2nd 05 06:14 PM
Two Shortwave Listener (SWL) 10:1 Baluns for Random Wire Antennas	RHF	Swap	0	October 6th 04 09:51 PM
Newbie SWL question: Antenna geometry	Hidalgo	Shortwave	5	June 8th 04 03:47 AM
RF filters and Impedance Matching	Paul Burridge	Homebrew	16	April 10th 04 01:29 PM

Menu

About Us