Reply comments
 

wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
John Kasupski wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:35:06 GMT, "KØHB" wrote:

Comments to 05-235 attached.

--
73, de Hans, K0HB

Very good, Hans.

We're in agreement on the first part, anyway.

But I doubt it will make any difference. Many of the 18 petitions
included
various changes to entry-level license privileges, including the very
obvious one of giving Novice/Tech Plus HF privileges to all Techs.. Yet
FCC
repeatedly denied all of them.

In the NPRM, FCC makes it clear that their vision of the future looks
like this:

wrong again

How is it wrong, Mark?

by not being right

Why isn't it right?

asked by you answered by months ago

first proble is in asuming the FCC has a vision of the future

The NPRM makes it clear the FCC does have a vision of the
future.

it does nothing of the sort

Reply comments
 

I have a bridge for sale to anyone who thinks the
FCC & the ARRL have the best interets of ham radio in
mind.


FCC & ARRL are partners in the culture of corruption.

Reply comments
 

Green Slime wrote:
I have a bridge for sale to anyone who thinks the
FCC & the ARRL have the best interets of ham radio in
mind.

agreed more or less

However the ARRL thinks it does ( it is deluded by and large)

the FCC only caresa baout it mandates and budget


FCC & ARRL are partners in the culture of corruption.

and their interaction is the blind leading the blind