anothe rlie from hans
 

KØHB wrote:
"an old friend" wrote


once the word was attached to the military
only the vechile was allowed

If I carefully re-arrange those words, I get the impression that you wantto
convey the thought that once the military uses a word (like "jeep" for G P),
then all civilian use of the word in not allowed?

That's a large a lie as I've ever witnessed here on rrap, right up there with "I
was a Colonel in the Chemical Corps".

and that has been Stevie contention for year

and when you going sue me as you pormised ?

BTW, what is a "ve chile" anyhow? Is that a Canadian person under the age of 6?

more mocking the disabled

By the way, I'm still looking for a good jeep-style amateur radio logging
program. Do you have any nominations?

how about pencil and paper

Beep beep
de Hans, K0HB
--

anothe rlie from hans
 

KØHB wrote:
"an old friend" wrote


once the word was attached to the military
only the vechile was allowed

If I carefully re-arrange those words, I get the impression that you wantto
convey the thought that once the military uses a word (like "jeep" for G P),
then all civilian use of the word in not allowed?

That's a large a lie as I've ever witnessed here on rrap, right up there with "I
was a Colonel in the Chemical Corps".

and that has been Stevie contention for year

and when you going sue me as you pormised ?

BTW, what is a "ve chile" anyhow? Is that a Canadian person under the age of 6?

more mocking the disabled

By the way, I'm still looking for a good jeep-style amateur radio logging
program. Do you have any nominations?

how about pencil and paper

Beep beep
de Hans, K0HB
--

still more shit fro the asshoole of RRAP
 

"an old friend" wrote

what proof?

Proof? You want proof? I'm right, and you're wrong, and I can provide the
mathematical proof.

It is obvious, even to you, that the opposite of right is left and that three
lefts
make a right or 3l = r.

It is also clear that wrong is the opposite of right so -w = r.

So this would make 3l = r = -w which means that 3l = -w. Now, since
left is the opposite of right (-l = r) this would mean l = r = -w, which
playing with the math gives me l = -r = w and so left is the same as
wrong (yes, I could have done this in fewer steps, but I didn't feel
like doing that).

Now, since l = w and 3l = r that would make 3w = r. This means
that three wrongs make a right. Of course, since 3 is an odd number,
this situation doesn't work out with any values for r and w except 0
which would mean that r = 0 and w = 0 and l = 0, although the last
one I don't really care about.

This means that right and wrong are mathematically identical and so
classifying things as right or wrong is pointless because both of them are
the same. And since there is no difference between right and wrong, that
would make ME always right and YOU always wrong and isn't that the
thing that rrap is all about?

2 + 2 = 8 if you assign sufficiently large values to 2.

Warmest personal wishes for the holiday,

de Hans, K0HB
--
If a `religion' is defined to be a system of ideas that contains unprovable
statements, then Kurt Godel taught us that mathematics is not only a
religion, it is the only religion that can prove itself to be one.

still more shit fro the asshoole of RRAP
 

KØHB wrote:
"an old friend" wrote

what proof?

Proof? You want proof? I'm right, and you're wrong, and I can provide the
mathematical proof.

it become obvious you can't

It is obvious, even to you, that the opposite of right is left and that three
lefts
make a right or 3l = r.
nope you are making a false stament

therfore the rest of your **** needs to be flush.

anothe rlie from hans
 

"an Old friend" wrote


BTW, what is a "ve chile" anyhow? Is that a Canadian person under the age of
6?

more mocking the disabled

Are Canadian children disabled?

Beep beep
de Hans, K0HB

hans jions stvei bashing the disabled with mockery
 

KØHB wrote:
"an Old friend" wrote


BTW, what is a "ve chile" anyhow? Is that a Canadian person under theage of
6?

more mocking the disabled

Are Canadian children disabled?
some yes of course

when you goign to sue me asshole

Beep beep
de Hans, K0HB

General purpose logger
 

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KØHB" wrote in message
k.net...
My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog,
but support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product.

Bought EQF-logger, but after a few months of use I still haven't gotten
used to the kluge-operator-interface, so I've written that one off.

Here's my list of MUST HAVE features:

An intuitive, non-rodent-centric operator interface, similar to the
simplicity of Hyperlog or CT (Mouse OK for non-routine functions, but
logging sequences must be
touch-typist-hands-on-the-keyboard-no-need-to-watch-the-screen.)

Radio control integration

LoTW integration

Import from ADIF

Good support from the author

Any suggestions?

de Hans, K0HB
--
{{{{* http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb




Hans,

I also dropped EQF for those reasons. I then went to N3FJP and I love em.
Check it out on the web at;

www.n3fjp.com

Dan/W4NTI

Welcome Back Dan,
You were missed.
But, I'm sure some low class operators didn't miss you.
Very, 73
Ace - WH2T

General purpose logger
 

wrote in message
ups.com...

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"KØHB" wrote in message
k.net...
My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog,
but support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product.

Bought EQF-logger, but after a few months of use I still haven't gotten
used to the kluge-operator-interface, so I've written that one off.

Here's my list of MUST HAVE features:

An intuitive, non-rodent-centric operator interface, similar to the
simplicity of Hyperlog or CT (Mouse OK for non-routine functions, but
logging sequences must be
touch-typist-hands-on-the-keyboard-no-need-to-watch-the-screen.)

Radio control integration

LoTW integration

Import from ADIF

Good support from the author

Any suggestions?

de Hans, K0HB
--
{{{{* http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb




Hans,

I also dropped EQF for those reasons. I then went to N3FJP and I love em.
Check it out on the web at;

www.n3fjp.com

Dan/W4NTI

Dan, you were gone longer than expected. Welcome back. bb

Welcome back to what 'bb' ? I dropped out of RRAP and RRAM when I said I
did. I didn't notice this was a cross posted message till now. You can
find me on r.r.a.dx discussing real ham radio things.

Have a Nice Christmas

Dan/W4NTI

still more shit fro the asshoole of RRAP
 

Hello Hans,
Great logic. I found an error / probable typo in your equation.
See below.
Very 73 & Merry Christmas, Ace - WH2T


"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"an old friend" wrote

what proof?

Proof? You want proof? I'm right, and you're wrong, and I can provide
the mathematical proof.

It is obvious, even to you, that the opposite of right is left and that
three lefts
make a right or 3l = r.

It is also clear that wrong is the opposite of right so -w = r.

So this would make 3l = r = -w which means that 3l = -w.


Now, since
left is the opposite of right (-l = r) this would mean l = r = -w,


( SHOULD READ left is the opposite of right (-l = r) this would mean -l =
r = -w, )



which
playing with the math gives me l = -r = w and so left is the same as
wrong (yes, I could have done this in fewer steps, but I didn't feel
like doing that).

Now, since l = w and 3l = r that would make 3w = r. This means
that three wrongs make a right. Of course, since 3 is an odd number,
this situation doesn't work out with any values for r and w except 0
which would mean that r = 0 and w = 0 and l = 0, although the last
one I don't really care about.

This means that right and wrong are mathematically identical and so
classifying things as right or wrong is pointless because both of them are
the same. And since there is no difference between right and wrong, that
would make ME always right and YOU always wrong and isn't that the
thing that rrap is all about?

2 + 2 = 8 if you assign sufficiently large values to 2.

Warmest personal wishes for the holiday,

de Hans, K0HB
--

still more shit fro the asshoole of RRAP
 

"KØHB" wrote in message

It is obvious, even to you, that the opposite of right is left and that
three lefts
make a right or 3l = r.

It is also clear that wrong is the opposite of right so -w = r.


You're using the variable "r" for two very different and unrelated
quantites, "right" as in "starboard" and "right" as in "correct", hence
turning your proof into poop. To avoid such ambiguity, instead use the
equations 3l = s (s for starboard) and -w = c (c for correct). But good
luck finding a relationship between s and c.

Merry Christ Mass,
Jeff KH6O
--
Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard
Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System