Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jeffrey Herman wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: One license. Existing licenses would be valid until expiration with no renewals -- they would need to pass the single-license test if they want to continue. Let's crunch some numbers: Our total MF/HF spectrum consists of just 3.75 MHz, with only about half of it, 1875 kHz, useful for communications at any one particular time of the day. If suddenly, as if by magic, all licensees were granted MF/HF privileges, we could possibly have 670,000 hams attempting to fill that 1.875 MHz. Okay, I'll grant you that folks have to work and sleep, so let's say at any one time, we have one-fourth of all 670 kilohams on the air, with two per QSO. That would mean each QSO would be separated by just 22 Hz. I'll be more generous. Let's pretend that all 3.75 MHz is available all the time, with say, one-tenth of all operators on at any one time; now each two-person QSO is separated by 112 Hz. Getting better. Sounds like the old argument for the Morse Code Exam - to keep people out of amateur radio. Worried that I didn't take into account frequency re-use? Alright, suppose we could manage three simultaneous QSOs spread across the country on a single frequency; each such grouping would now be separated by 336 Hz. That could be done if we ban phone. Ah! The perfect width for CW. Could be a renaissance for the mode. I'll never understand this liberal mentality of wanting to grant everyone MF/HF privileges; I'll never understand the liberal mentality wanting set asides of public domain for few priveleged people to have a little fun. Kind of reminds me of the Arctic Wildlife Refuge where only F&W scientists are ever likely to set foot. Kind of reminds me of the falsified bobcat fur that F&W tried to use to close off 15 million acres of public lands to sportsmen. it's no longer a privilege if it's something that everyone can get practically for free. If they meet the necessary government requirements. We received our current spectrum total at a time (WARC 1979) when we had less than half the present number of hams. This movement of wanting to "fill up the bands or we'll lose them" is nonsense. Yet we lost unused spectrum. As Michael Savage says, "Liberalism is a mental disorder." Jeff KH6O He is correct. |