Phil Kane wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:08:36 GMT, KØHB wrote:

Which raises the next question --- who CARES what the FCC wants.

I care what the FCC wants.

Your income is tied to what the FCC wants.

Whether I think that they are on the
right track or not is not the issue.

Correct for a barrister in your position.

We the people engage professionals to do a job, in this case, be the
"Highway Patrol of the Airwaves". We frustrate that by second-guessing
them at every turn, telling them that we know better, and thereby not
letting them do the job that we hired them for.

That usually involved the assistance of a barrister

If the bottom line is that the folks we engage do not do a
professional job, throw then out and get folks who will. This
presumes that you have better professional qualifications than they
do.

The NPRM and R/O of 98 sure didn't impress. How many of those folks
retired on a fat salary?

As an employer you know that scenario very well.

Hans is an employer? Of what sort?

They should serve the wants of the people, not the other way around.

No, they should provide for the NEEDS of the people.

Needs/Wants? Jim "needs" numerous license classes. As long as he can
stay on top.

Otherwise,
it's like letting the kids live on candy bars and soda rather than
health-giving food.

Happy New Year to y'all.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

Phil, Happy New Year to you, too!!!