|
Balloon Launch This Afternoon
From the reflectors:
"The University of Tennessee ARC is planning a balloon launch on Saturday afternoon at about 1:30 PM, and they could use YOUR help. They're going for the distance record with this launch, and the balloon will include a CW beacon on HF, which will be relaying telemetry and location information. Feedback from monitoring stations will provide them with the data they need to achieve their record. The beacon will be on 14.325 MHz (+ or - 2kHz)and will be transmitting AA4UT/B every 15 seconds, with the full telemetry data given every 4 minutes (stuff like altitude, latitude and longitude, temperature, battery voltage, etc.)" "If you copy their signals, please QSL to www.utarc.org They'd really appreciate it." (I presume the time is 1:30 PM EST) 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Balloon Launch This Afternoon
wrote: From the reflectors: "The University of Tennessee ARC is planning a balloon launch on Saturday afternoon at about 1:30 PM, and they could use YOUR help. They're going for the distance record with this launch, and the balloon will include a CW beacon on HF, which will be relaying telemetry and location information. Feedback from monitoring stations will provide them with the data they need to achieve their record. The beacon will be on 14.325 MHz (+ or - 2kHz)and will be transmitting AA4UT/B every 15 seconds, with the full telemetry data given every 4 minutes (stuff like altitude, latitude and longitude, temperature, battery voltage, etc.)" "If you copy their signals, please QSL to www.utarc.org They'd really appreciate it." (I presume the time is 1:30 PM EST) 73 de Jim, N2EY Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M? |
Balloon Launch This Afternoon
wrote: wrote: From the reflectors: "The University of Tennessee ARC is planning a balloon launch on Saturday afternoon at about 1:30 PM, and they could use YOUR help. They're going for the distance record with this launch, They better put someone on the West coast to watch for it coming around. During the atmosphere expirements of IGY 57-58, nearly every balloon circumnavigated the globe at least once. and the balloon will include a CW beacon on HF, which will be relaying telemetry and location information. Feedback from monitoring stations will provide them with the data they need to achieve their record. The beacon will be on 14.325 MHz (+ or - 2kHz)and will be transmitting AA4UT/B every 15 seconds, with the full telemetry data given every 4 minutes (stuff like altitude, latitude and longitude, temperature, battery voltage, etc.)" "If you copy their signals, please QSL to www.utarc.org They'd really appreciate it." (I presume the time is 1:30 PM EST) 73 de Jim, N2EY How is Mike's project coming along? 'Bout the same as your "antenna farm". |
Balloon Launch This Afternoon
wrote: From the reflectors: "The University of Tennessee ARC is planning a balloon launch on Saturday afternoon at about 1:30 PM, and they could use YOUR help. They're going for the distance record with this launch, and the balloon will include a CW beacon on HF, which will be relaying telemetry and location information. Feedback from monitoring stations will provide them with the data they need to achieve their record. The beacon will be on 14.325 MHz (+ or - 2kHz)and will be transmitting AA4UT/B every 15 seconds, with the full telemetry data given every 4 minutes (stuff like altitude, latitude and longitude, temperature, battery voltage, etc.)" "If you copy their signals, please QSL to www.utarc.org They'd really appreciate it." Wunnerful wunnerful. So where's the plotters awready?? (I presume the time is 1:30 PM EST) 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Balloon Launch This Afternoon
On 31 Dec 2005 17:01:09 -0800, wrote:
wrote: From the reflectors: "The University of Tennessee ARC is planning a balloon launch on Saturday afternoon at about 1:30 PM, and they could use YOUR help. They're going for the distance record with this launch, and the balloon will include a CW beacon on HF, which will be relaying telemetry and location information. Feedback from monitoring stations will provide them with the data they need to achieve their record. The beacon will be on 14.325 MHz (+ or - 2kHz)and will be transmitting AA4UT/B every 15 seconds, with the full telemetry data given every 4 minutes (stuff like altitude, latitude and longitude, temperature, battery voltage, etc.)" "If you copy their signals, please QSL to www.utarc.org They'd really appreciate it." (I presume the time is 1:30 PM EST) 73 de Jim, N2EY Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M? why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode but anything on results? _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Balloon Launch This Afternoon
wrote: On 31 Dec 2005 17:01:09 -0800, wrote: Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M? why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode Someone put this day on the calendar. Mark FINALLY said something with which I can wholeheartedly, unrepentingly agree with. but anything on results? Ditto. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Balloon Launch This Afternoon
K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 31 Dec 2005 17:01:09 -0800, wrote: Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M? why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode Someone put this day on the calendar. why? Mark FINALLY said something with which I can wholeheartedly, unrepentingly agree with. it is not the first time it is not even the first time you have done so in my own name but anything on results? Ditto. 73 can't go a whole post without lying eh steve Steve, K4YZ |
Balloon Launch This Afternoon
In article ,
wrote: | record. The beacon will be on 14.325 MHz (+ or - 2kHz)and will be | transmitting AA4UT/B every 15 seconds, with the full telemetry data | given every 4 minutes (stuff like altitude, latitude and longitude, | temperature, battery voltage, etc.)" .... | why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the | report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to | me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode If the beacon is broadcasting it's current coordinates, then it really doesn't matter where the recevier is, does it? Only that he's able to pick up the signal and relay the coordinates as received. In that case, a 14 MHz signal ought to be receivable by more people than a 2 meter or 70 cm signal, right? So using a HF band ought to allow more reports to come in ... (Or am I missing something here?) -- Doug McLaren, If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate. |
Balloon Launch This Afternoon
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 31 Dec 2005 17:01:09 -0800, wrote: Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M? why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode Someone put this day on the calendar. why? Obvioulsy you were too impatient to read further before commenting, then too stupid to go back and edit after reading why. Mark FINALLY said something with which I can wholeheartedly, unrepentingly agree with. it is not the first time It's the first time in 7 years. That's long enough to have been declared dead in most states. it is not even the first time you have done so in my own name but anything on results? Ditto. 73 can't go a whole post without lying eh steve What lie? The "73"...?!?! Mark, when you act right, discuss things in a meaningful manner and do so without being snide, slanderous, profane or presumptive, I have no problem addressing you like I do anyone else, and that includes sending you a "73". And if you'll notice, those "73" 's are very few and very far between! Like now. Steve, K4YZ |
more lies more child abuse from steve
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 31 Dec 2005 17:01:09 -0800, wrote: Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M? why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode Someone put this day on the calendar. why? Obvioulsy you were too impatient to read further before commenting, then too stupid to go back and edit after reading why. lie therefore child abuse Mark FINALLY said something with which I can wholeheartedly, unrepentingly agree with. it is not the first time It's the first time in 7 years. That's long enough to have been declared dead in most states. it is not even the first time you have done so in my own name but anything on results? Ditto. 73 can't go a whole post without lying eh steve What lie? The "73"...?!?! Mark, when you act right, discuss things in a meaningful manner and do so without being snide, slanderous, profane or presumptive, I have no problem addressing you like I do anyone else, and that includes sending you a "73". you lied in your post long before your got to the 73 and with your choose to be insulting And if you'll notice, those "73" 's are very few and very far between! indeed you are very rare with your 73's but you don't even meet the Stadards you set Like now. Steve, K4YZ |
More Markie Mularkie
an Old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 31 Dec 2005 17:01:09 -0800, wrote: Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M? why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode Someone put this day on the calendar. why? Obvioulsy you were too impatient to read further before commenting, then too stupid to go back and edit after reading why. lie Nope. therefore child abuse You've stopped the meds again, haven't you, Markie? Mark FINALLY said something with which I can wholeheartedly, unrepentingly agree with. it is not the first time It's the first time in 7 years. That's long enough to have been declared dead in most states. it is not even the first time you have done so in my own name but anything on results? Ditto. 73 can't go a whole post without lying eh steve What lie? The "73"...?!?! Mark, when you act right, discuss things in a meaningful manner and do so without being snide, slanderous, profane or presumptive, I have no problem addressing you like I do anyone else, and that includes sending you a "73". you lied in your post long before your got to the 73 Nope. and with your choose to be insulting Huh? And if you'll notice, those "73" 's are very few and very far between! indeed you are very rare with your 73's but you don't even meet the Stadards you set What's a "stadard"...? Steve, K4YZ |
steve admit he needs to be on meds
On 4 Jan 2006 17:04:14 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an Old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 31 Dec 2005 17:01:09 -0800, wrote: Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M? why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode Someone put this day on the calendar. why? Obvioulsy you were too impatient to read further before commenting, then too stupid to go back and edit after reading why. lie Nope. yes you lied therefore child abuse You've stopped the meds again, haven't you, Markie? nope but you just admitted YOU need to be on the meds you are the one that claimed lying= child abuse Mark FINALLY said something with which I can wholeheartedly, unrepentingly agree with. it is not the first time It's the first time in 7 years. That's long enough to have been declared dead in most states. lie d there too and cut out the response cowardly ling at that it is not even the first time you have done so in my own name but anything on results? Ditto. 73 can't go a whole post without lying eh steve What lie? The "73"...?!?! Mark, when you act right, discuss things in a meaningful manner and do so without being snide, slanderous, profane or presumptive, I have no problem addressing you like I do anyone else, and that includes sending you a "73". you lied in your post long before your got to the 73 Nope. yes you did you lied in saying it was the first time in 7 years you agreed with and you lied in saying I had not read your post and other places as well and with your choose to be insulting Huh? And if you'll notice, those "73" 's are very few and very far between! indeed you are very rare with your 73's but you don't even meet the Stadards you set What's a "stadard"...? something you don't have Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
More Markie Mularkie
wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 17:04:14 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: an Old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 31 Dec 2005 17:01:09 -0800, wrote: Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M? why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode Someone put this day on the calendar. why? Obvioulsy you were too impatient to read further before commenting, then too stupid to go back and edit after reading why. lie Nope. yes you lied Nope. therefore child abuse You've stopped the meds again, haven't you, Markie? nope but you just admitted YOU need to be on the meds No, I did not. you are the one that claimed lying= child abuse No, Markie, I did not. I said TEACHING CHILDREN TO LIE is child abuse. Try to get this right! You've been misquoting this all week! (As if misquoting is new to you...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!) Mark FINALLY said something with which I can wholeheartedly, unrepentingly agree with. it is not the first time It's the first time in 7 years. That's long enough to have been declared dead in most states. lie d there too and cut out the response cowardly ling at that You need to get those "anger control issues" back under control, Markie. Your dreck in here is barely readable as it is, then you go off the deep end and it get's worse. it is not even the first time you have done so in my own name but anything on results? Ditto. 73 can't go a whole post without lying eh steve What lie? The "73"...?!?! Mark, when you act right, discuss things in a meaningful manner and do so without being snide, slanderous, profane or presumptive, I have no problem addressing you like I do anyone else, and that includes sending you a "73". you lied in your post long before your got to the 73 Nope. yes you did Nope. you lied in saying it was the first time in 7 years you agreed with and you lied in saying I had not read your post and other places as well Such as? and with your choose to be insulting Huh? And if you'll notice, those "73" 's are very few and very far between! indeed you are very rare with your 73's but you don't even meet the Stadards you set What's a "stadard"...? something you don't have What's a "stadard"...?!?! It's not in Websters. I've not set any "stadards", Markie, whatever a "stadard" is. Steve, K4YZ |
stveie lies
On 5 Jan 2006 01:48:04 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 17:04:14 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: an Old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 31 Dec 2005 17:01:09 -0800, wrote: Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M? why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode Someone put this day on the calendar. why? Obvioulsy you were too impatient to read further before commenting, then too stupid to go back and edit after reading why. lie Nope. yes you lied Nope. therefore child abuse You've stopped the meds again, haven't you, Markie? nope but you just admitted YOU need to be on the meds No, I did not. yep you did you are the one that claimed lying= child abuse No, Markie, I did not. I said TEACHING CHILDREN TO LIE is child abuse. you said both Try to get this right! You've been misquoting this all week! (As if misquoting is new to you...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!) not at all you said that lying was the same as kiddy porn which means it is the as child abuse right here http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...13a0525654b952 stop with your lying Mark FINALLY said something with which I can wholeheartedly, unrepentingly agree with. it is not the first time It's the first time in 7 years. That's long enough to have been declared dead in most states. lie d there too and cut out the response cowardly ling at that You need to get those "anger control issues" back under control, Markie. Your dreck in here is barely readable as it is, then you go off the deep end and it get's worse. it is not even the first time you have done so in my own name but anything on results? Ditto. 73 can't go a whole post without lying eh steve What lie? The "73"...?!?! Mark, when you act right, discuss things in a meaningful manner and do so without being snide, slanderous, profane or presumptive, I have no problem addressing you like I do anyone else, and that includes sending you a "73". you lied in your post long before your got to the 73 Nope. yes you did Nope. you lied in saying it was the first time in 7 years you agreed with and you lied in saying I had not read your post and other places as well Such as? and with your choose to be insulting Huh? And if you'll notice, those "73" 's are very few and very far between! indeed you are very rare with your 73's but you don't even meet the Stadards you set What's a "stadard"...? something you don't have What's a "stadard"...?!?! It's not in Websters. I've not set any "stadards", Markie, whatever a "stadard" is. Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
More Markie Mularkie
wrote: On 5 Jan 2006 01:48:04 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 17:04:14 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: an Old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 31 Dec 2005 17:01:09 -0800, wrote: Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M? why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode Someone put this day on the calendar. why? Obvioulsy you were too impatient to read further before commenting, then too stupid to go back and edit after reading why. lie Nope. yes you lied Nope. therefore child abuse You've stopped the meds again, haven't you, Markie? nope but you just admitted YOU need to be on the meds No, I did not. yep you did Nope. Prove it. you are the one that claimed lying= child abuse No, Markie, I did not. I said TEACHING CHILDREN TO LIE is child abuse. you said both Why do you insist on blatantly lying in public, Mark? Try to get this right! You've been misquoting this all week! (As if misquoting is new to you...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!) not at all Absolutey "at all". you said that lying was the same as kiddy porn which means it is the as child abuse Mark, you reeeeeeeeally need to take an English comprehension course. right here http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...13a0525654b952 It's STILL not "there", Markie. S T O P L Y I N G! ! ! ! L E A R N E N G L I S H Y O U I D I O T ! ! ! ! ! ! stop with your lying In order to "stop" one must have started. Steve, K4YZ |
why are you lying?
K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 5 Jan 2006 01:48:04 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: cut yes you lied Nope. therefore child abuse You've stopped the meds again, haven't you, Markie? nope but you just admitted YOU need to be on the meds No, I did not. yep you did Nope. yep Prove it. why it is all there in the text you are the one that claimed lying= child abuse No, Markie, I did not. I said TEACHING CHILDREN TO LIE is child abuse. you said both Why do you insist on blatantly lying in public, Mark? not the one lying you are Try to get this right! You've been misquoting this all week! (As if misquoting is new to you...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!) not at all Absolutey "at all". you said that lying was the same as kiddy porn which means it is the as child abuse Mark, you reeeeeeeeally need to take an English comprehension course. nope you need a course in logic and in english for that matter as well yor you would not make asiine statements like "lying is the same as kiddy porn" but you made em and you stuck by it like the fool you are right here http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...13a0525654b952 It's STILL not "there", Markie. sure is S T O P L Y I N G! ! ! ! not lying you are though L E A R N E N G L I S H Y O U I D I O T ! ! ! ! ! ! you are the one with the english problem stop with your lying In order to "stop" one must have started. you started years ago Steve, K4YZ |
why did you lie steve?
K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 5 Jan 2006 01:48:04 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: cut nope but you just admitted YOU need to be on the meds No, I did not. yep you did Nope. yes you did why did you lie steve? Prove it. you are the one that claimed lying= child abuse No, Markie, I did not. I said TEACHING CHILDREN TO LIE is child abuse. you said both Why do you insist on blatantly lying in public, Mark? no lie on my part why did you lie steve? Try to get this right! You've been misquoting this all week! (As if misquoting is new to you...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!) not at all Absolutey "at all". no misquote you said lying is the same as kiddy porn and kiddy porn is the same as child abuse no misquote at all why did you lie steve? you said that lying was the same as kiddy porn which means it is the as child abuse Mark, you reeeeeeeeally need to take an English comprehension course. why did you lie steve? right here http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...13a0525654b952 It's STILL not "there", Markie. sure is S T O P L Y I N G! ! ! ! that is what you need to to so stop lying L E A R N E N G L I S H Y O U I D I O T ! ! ! ! ! ! again you need to learn english and use it in your postings stop with your lying In order to "stop" one must have started. why did you lie steve? Steve, K4YZ |
more of steve abusive lies
On 5 Jan 2006 01:48:04 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 17:04:14 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: an Old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut you are the one that claimed lying= child abuse No, Markie, I did not. yes you did the exact quote is that "lying is the same as kiddy porn" I said TEACHING CHILDREN TO LIE is child abuse. you told that lie too Try to get this right! You've been misquoting this all week! (As if misquoting is new to you...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!) cut cowardly ling at that You need to get those "anger control issues" back under control, Markie. then you should help by stoping your lies about yuor own statement Your dreck in here is barely readable as it is, then you go off the deep end and it get's worse. making another another everytime you claim you can't read it keep your lies staight cut What's a "stadard"...? something you don't have What's a "stadard"...?!?! It's not in Websters. I've not set any "stadards", Markie, whatever a "stadard" is. Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable he regualrly makes threats of aresst or of the power to confine folks againsthere will he is lying of course STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com