Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 07:07:50 -0500, "Dee Flint"
wrote: BEGIN QUOTE wrote in message roups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "KØHB" wrote in message news ![]() "Dee Flint" wrote in message news ![]() And the "legal no-no" (§97.315, §97.317) does not apply to homebrewed amplifiers, which the item in question appears to be. Amateur-to-amateur sales are also exempt. Didn't the FCC change that in the last year or two? Since it didn't successfully keep the amplifiers off the CB band anyway, I believe they dropped that restriction. §97.315 and §97.317 remain in effect. Well it looks like that item (WT Docket 04-140) is still in limbo. Part of it does include changing the amplifier rules but it hasn't been implemented. IIRC, those rules date back to 1978. They're a result of widespread use of external "linear" amplifiers by cb and freeband users. FCC thought that outlawing the manufacture and sale of such amplifiers would decrease their use, which is completely illegal. Of course no such effect occurred, and the manufacture, sale and use of such amplifiers by cb and freeband users continues even today. END QUOTE Yes, the reason and date are correct. There's an extensive discussion of the docket on the ARRL website. Because the current rules have not stopped the illegal CB use, the FCC proposed to eliminate these restrictions but has not yet acted to do so. The use of these amplifiers is already prohibited by the CB regulations and the additional regulation had no impact since there was no significant level of enforcement. Reminds me of a state that hired a consultant to evaluate what new laws were needed to reduce the number and severity of car/bicycle accidents. His conclusion was that the state needed to enforce the laws already on the books and that no new laws were needed. the only p"problem" with your line of reasoning in this matter is that it is in fact logical, and that the Govt is involved to end the reg today would be an addistion in some eyes that the FCC made a mistakes in writing them and no crat wants to admit a mistake eiter his own or that of anynother crats lest he be denounced as makking a mistake himself some day the same reason keep in place the silly about rnage of conatct (being 100 or 150 miles I don't recall) on a band that can support long range with breaking the other rules even I have borke that by accientedt near the last peak thinking i was tlaking to someone around springfeild (without checking it was ILLinois ) til is became clear iit wasn't) thus breaking the rule Dee D. Flint, N8UZE everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |