Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() ARRL SUCKS wrote: The ARRL, with the help of the FCC, sold out ham radio years ago. The ARRL & FCC are partners in the Culture of Corruption. K1MAN is the only one fighting for our rights in ham radio. but is fighting the answer? |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dit Dah" Hunter@lowpower wrote in message ... "Hamfest Tuba Player" wrote in message oups.com... Far as I'm concerned the ARRL and K1MAN can go "F" off with each other. Both of em are full of hot air and mutually destructive to the future of Ham Radio. Oh? The ARRL is easily ignored and placed on the back shelf. Their recent mass mailings looking for new members tells a tale, but we can toss those mailings aside. Put em' in the recycle bin. Not so Glenn Baxter, who continues with his "in your face" confrontations on 20 meters. Wait...now that I ponder this? Yes! Why not ignore both and use the VFO that comes with most radios these days? What a concept!! You know how it is with the television stations, don't you? See or hear something you don't like? Easy and simple solution...turn the damned thing off! And for you technically challenged types? Unplug the power cord! Dittos for Baxter...shut the son-of-a-bitch off! How a complicated is that??? And the ARRL? Same for them...shut their broadcasts off, too. Baxter thrives on controversy, so why engage him in same? Why? If the ARRL and Baxter run out of listeners...if nobody responds? Ignores them? The end result is a fairly simple conclusion. Now, wasn't that ever so simple? And painless? Don't you incontinent old geezers wish you'd have come up with this simple solution long ago? You guys could have dropped your systolic at least ten points and saved a few bucks on your Relys, too. But then, that would be much too much to expect, wouldn't it? True enough; it is too bad that many in this newsgroup don't heed your note when some of the *very* long threads of accusations, threats, innuendos, etc. break out ... At least the thread started with something at least remotely related to amateur radio .... 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:58:04 GMT, "Jim Hampton"
wrote: cut geezers wish you'd have come up with this simple solution long ago? You guys could have dropped your systolic at least ten points and saved a few bucks on your Relys, too. But then, that would be much too much to expect, wouldn't it? True enough; it is too bad that many in this newsgroup don't heed your note when some of the *very* long threads of accusations, threats, innuendos, etc. break out ... jim it is about control and turnign the dail doesn't satisfy the control freak At least the thread started with something at least remotely related to amateur radio .... indeed which is nice 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Hampton" wrote more off topic B.S. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:37:42 -0500, "Herb"
wrote: "Jim Hampton" wrote more off topic B.S. off topic How? _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The whole point of this thread is this, K1MAN was fined for doing the
same-thing that W1AW is doing. I believe that the rules should apply to all, instead W1AW and the ARRL has never been fined and it raises questions on where is the ARRL is in bed with the FCC. Bottom line the rules should apply ALL and no one should be exempted from them. Todd N9OGL |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N9OGL wrote: The whole point of this thread is this, K1MAN was fined for doing the same-thing that W1AW is doing. I believe that the rules should apply to all, instead W1AW and the ARRL has never been fined and it raises questions on where is the ARRL is in bed with the FCC. Well the ARRL has held over a certain amount of credit from the "old days" and has been more cooperative than K1MAN has been (not right mind you but a fact of life) Bottom line the rules should apply ALL and no one should be exempted from them. Todd N9OGL |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Microcephalic Roger" StalkerOfLloyds@Glendale wrote in message ... "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... N9OGL wrote: The whole point of this thread is this, K1MAN was fined for doing the same-thing that W1AW is doing. I believe that the rules should apply to all, instead W1AW and the ARRL has never been fined and it raises questions on where is the ARRL is in bed with the FCC. Well the ARRL has held over a certain amount of credit from the "old days" and has been more cooperative than K1MAN has been (not right mind you but a fact of life) Bottom line the rules should apply ALL and no one should be exempted from them. Todd N9OGL Does this include Kiddy Porn too, Todd? Oh, wait. Sure thing. Your version of Kiddy Porn is in cartoon form and is thus legal, but it still exemplifies just how sick your warped little mind really is. Do your parents know about your sick proclivities, Todd? Maybe they do and maybe that is why they keep you locked in the basement and away from society at large. I wonder what your parents would think if someone were to send them the URL of your sick little site?? You, Todd, are a potential child molester if you are not already so. You and Wiseman both belong in the same Loony Bin. .............................. And if you visit Todd's sick site? Use a proxy server. Toad is harvesting IP addresses to determine who else is just as sick as he is. I sure wouldn't want Todd in MY neighborhood! |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:27:21 -0500, "Microcephalic Roger"
StalkerOfLloyds@Glendale wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message roups.com... N9OGL wrote: The whole point of this thread is this, K1MAN was fined for doing the same-thing that W1AW is doing. I believe that the rules should apply to all, instead W1AW and the ARRL has never been fined and it raises questions on where is the ARRL is in bed with the FCC. Well the ARRL has held over a certain amount of credit from the "old days" and has been more cooperative than K1MAN has been (not right mind you but a fact of life) Bottom line the rules should apply ALL and no one should be exempted from them. Todd N9OGL cutcutting the bs _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:43:15 -0500, "666" anon@anon wrote:
wrote in message .. . On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:27:21 -0500, "Microcephalic Roger" StalkerOfLloyds@Glendale wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message groups.com... N9OGL wrote: The whole point of this thread is this, K1MAN was fined for doing the same-thing that W1AW is doing. I believe that the rules should apply to all, instead W1AW and the ARRL has never been fined and it raises questions on where is the ARRL is in bed with the FCC. Well the ARRL has held over a certain amount of credit from the "old days" and has been more cooperative than K1MAN has been (not right mind you but a fact of life) Bottom line the rules should apply ALL and no one should be exempted from them. Todd N9OGL cutcutting the bs _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|