Woger still knows nothing about SWR
 

On 26 May 2006 06:38:18 -0700, Cowardly Secwet Woger wrote:
:
: Stagger Lee wrote:
: On 26 May 2006 06:02:16 -0700, Secwet Coward Woger wrote:
: :
: [lies flushed]
:
: The fact is, **** up, he did post it and it wasn't a forgery, you
: ignorant fat ****.

Oh indeed it WAS a forgery. And the forger outed himself in a couple of
different ways: (1) Oris doesn't write in the style used, and (2) Oris
spelled his own name incorrectly.

Thus the forger looked like the fool that he is.

: --
: Stupid Lee (Stagger Lee@ houston-hunks.com) provides yet anothre
: example of his idiocy in
: :
: "That's because transmission line loss and SWR are not directly
: related."

I *LOVE* it when you hand stuff like this to me. You really believe
that the statement above is obviously in error, don't you? In fact,
you are revealing your own profound ignorance.

We covered this topic a long time ago, and even your old DeVry
instructor agreed that I was correct. Basically, you can have zero
loss and infinite VSWR on a line (an ideal twin lead with an open
termination is a simple example), or you can have total loss with a
1:1 VSWR at the transmitter end of the line. A very lossy coaxial
line makes an excellent dummy load, delivering no power to an open
termination, and yet showing a 1:1 VSWR on the transmitting end. You
can also come up with a 1:1 VSWR for a completely lossless, ideally
terminated line, thereby making it quite obvious that line loss and
SWR are not directly related.

[This space reserved for more cut and paste nonsense by the group dummy.]





====================
"Guess again ****-for-brains. Maybe I got back on Stratuswave through
somebody else signing up and just using their account on purpose, just
to **** you ****heads and Stratuswave off. BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!" --
AB8MQ in message-id

Saggytits ntries to backpedal AGAIN
 

Saggytits Lee wrote:
On 26 May 2006 06:38:18 -0700, Cowardly Secwet Woger wrote:
:
: Stagger Lee wrote:
: On 26 May 2006 06:02:16 -0700, Secwet Coward Woger wrote:
: :
: [lies flushed]
:
: The fact is, **** up, he did post it and it wasn't a forgery, you
: ignorant fat ****.

Oh, Saggy, how's the high blood pressure, you fat ****? Was it exciting
for you to watch your wife go down on your family pet?

Oh indeed it was

MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

get help
 

wrote:
Saggytits Lee wrote:
On 26 May 2006 06:38:18 -0700, Cowardly Secwet Woger wrote:
:
: Stagger Lee wrote:
: On 26 May 2006 06:02:16 -0700, Secwet Coward Woger wrote:
: :
: [lies flushed]
:
: The fact is, **** up, he did post it and it wasn't a forgery, you
: ignorant fat ****.

Oh, Saggy, how's the high blood pressure, you fat ****? Was it exciting
for you to watch your wife go down on your family pet?
get help!

Woger still knows nothing about SWR
 

Stagger Lee wrote:

On 26 May 2006 06:38:18 -0700, Cowardly Secwet Woger wrote:
:
: Stagger Lee wrote:
: On 26 May 2006 06:02:16 -0700, Secwet Coward Woger wrote:
: :
: [lies flushed]
:
: The fact is, **** up, he did post it and it wasn't a forgery, you
: ignorant fat ****.

Oh indeed it WAS a forgery. And the forger outed himself in a couple of
different ways: (1) Oris doesn't write in the style used, and (2) Oris
spelled his own name incorrectly.

Thus the forger looked like the fool that he is.

: --
: Stupid Lee (Stagger Lee@ houston-hunks.com) provides yet anothre
: example of his idiocy in
: :
: "That's because transmission line loss and SWR are not directly
: related."

I *LOVE* it when you hand stuff like this to me. You really believe
that the statement above is obviously in error, don't you? In fact,
you are revealing your own profound ignorance.

We covered this topic a long time ago, and even your old DeVry
instructor agreed that I was correct. Basically, you can have zero
loss and infinite VSWR on a line (an ideal twin lead with an open
termination is a simple example), or you can have total loss with a
1:1 VSWR at the transmitter end of the line. A very lossy coaxial
line makes an excellent dummy load, delivering no power to an open
termination, and yet showing a 1:1 VSWR on the transmitting end. You
can also come up with a 1:1 VSWR for a completely lossless, ideally
terminated line, thereby making it quite obvious that line loss and
SWR are not directly related.

[This space reserved for more cut and paste nonsense by the group dummy.]





====================
"Guess again ****-for-brains. Maybe I got back on Stratuswave through
somebody else signing up and just using their account on purpose, just
to **** you ****heads and Stratuswave off. BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!" --
AB8MQ in message-id

Would you expect anything less from a retard like Scheissman?
Scheissman is an ignoramus and always will be. Perhaps some counseling
would help him but I doubt that meds would even work.

deVry Master Degwee
 

Roger claims to earned a Masters Degwee via correspondence
from deVry Institute. does anyone know if such a thing is or was
ever possible? deVry offers Masters Degwees but not via
correspondence?


Lloyd
District Manager, Pizza Delight

deVry Master Degwee
 

www.careerpath-education.com/devry

Find out for yourself.

deVry Master Degwee
 

No web page there

Vern
http://h1.ripway.com/radiousa





"Steven" wrote in message
oups.com...
www.careerpath-education.com/devry

Find out for yourself.

deVry Master Degwee
 

Blame Google. It's their sidebar ads.

Woger still knows nothing about SWR
 

The only cure for Woger is for him to swallow the working end of a .45
and pull the trigger.

deVry Master Degwee
 

Well, Woger is a wascal!

Buck


"Lloyd" wrote in message
...
Roger claims to earned a Masters Degwee via correspondence
from deVry Institute. does anyone know if such a thing is or was
ever possible? deVry offers Masters Degwees but not via
correspondence?


Lloyd
District Manager, Pizza Delight