K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Congratulations to K1MAN. Good men always win.
|
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
W Hend wrote: Congratulations to K1MAN. Good men always win. if you are going to post you might try saying what happened |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Harold wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... W Hend wrote: Congratulations to K1MAN. Good men always win. if you are going to post you might try saying what happened Since you have so much time on your hands, you might try to go look it up. if i care enough i would but i don't realy have that kind of time on my hands iwork my posting on breaks |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
"an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... W Hend wrote: Congratulations to K1MAN. Good men always win. if you are going to post you might try saying what happened Since you have so much time on your hands, you might try to go look it up. |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
W Hend wrote: Congratulations to K1MAN. Good men always win. Well... Perhaps but bad hams get the boot from the FCC, eventually anyway. With the Red Light Rule in full force and the fine affirmed there is no doubt that K1MAN will be a highly prized vanity call in about 2 years. Unless he decides to pay up or cut a deal with his arch rivals at the FCC. Interesting development... The removal of the fake court case about the Red Light Rule from his web site... Wonder if he knew it was fake when he posted it... Funny that it showed within 2 days of the first mention of this rule in this news group.. Then disappears almost as fast when it is shown to be false... Draw your own conclusions. If good men always win, does that mean bad men always loose? |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
raved & whined in a message: Well... Perhaps but bad hams get the boot from /////// Idiotic Psycho-Babble FLUSHED /////// If stupidity were a commodity, you would have the market cornered............ROTFLMAO! |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Hans wrote: raved & whined in a message: Well... Perhaps but bad hams get the boot from /////// Idiotic Psycho-Babble FLUSHED /////// If stupidity were a commodity, you would have the market cornered............ROTFLMAO! Yes, but you kept it on the charts for ANOTHER WEAK. Franz is calling you and he is somewhat distressed. |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
wrote in message ups.com... Well... Perhaps but bad hams get the boot from the //stupidity snipped here// Did you ever upgrade? or do still have that No-Code Tech license? |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
"Steven" wrote in message oups.com... Hans wrote: raved & whined in a message: Well... Perhaps but bad hams get the boot from /////// Idiotic Psycho-Babble FLUSHED /////// If stupidity were a commodity, you would have the market cornered............ROTFLMAO! Yes, but you kept it on the charts for ANOTHER WEAK. Franz is calling you and he is somewhat distressed. The bar tender is calling *you* your bar bill is overdue. |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
"Steven" whined & cried wrote in a message ///FLUSHED/// What? More of your delusions here too? |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Lloyd wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Well... Perhaps but bad hams get the boot from the //stupidity snipped here// Did you ever upgrade? or do still have that No-Code Tech license? Why, you are kinda funny Lloyd, like a broken record, but funny... |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
wrote in message ups.com... Lloyd wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Well... Perhaps but bad hams get the boot from the //stupidity snipped here// Did you ever upgrade? or do still have that No-Code Tech license? Why, you are kinda funny Lloyd, like a broken record, but funny... And what do you consider your abnormal and envious obsession with K1MAN's personal business? |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Lloyd wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Lloyd wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Did you ever upgrade? or do still have that No-Code Tech license? And what do you consider your abnormal and envious obsession with K1MAN's personal business? funny you are obseesed with my very personal business and esp when it is has nothing to do the Ham radio K1MAN has choosen to make this affair all of our busniess |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
"an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Lloyd wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Lloyd wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Did you ever upgrade? or do still have that No-Code Tech license? And what do you consider your abnormal and envious obsession with K1MAN's personal business? funny you are obseesed with my very personal business and esp when it is has nothing to do the Ham radio K1MAN has choosen to make this affair all of our busniess PLONK FLUSHED gone! |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Roger wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... K1MAN has choosen to make this affair all of our busniess funny you are obseesed with my very personal business and esp when it is has nothing to do the Ham radio K1MAN has choosen to make this affair all of our busniess PLONK promises promises |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
wrote in message ups.com... Lloyd wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Well... Perhaps but bad hams get the boot from the //stupidity snipped here// Did you ever upgrade? or do still have that No-Code Tech license? Why, you are kinda funny Lloyd, like a broken record, but funny... What is even funnier is you posting on company time and using your employer's servers. Not a good idea at all on Usenet and particularly not in this forum............ |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Roger wrote: wrote in message ups.com... What is even funnier is you posting on company time and using your employer's servers. why? Not a good idea at all on Usenet and particularly not in this forum............ more threats? |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
In "Harold" IHearVoices@glendale writes:
"an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... W Hend wrote: Congratulations to K1MAN. Good men always win. if you are going to post you might try saying what happened Since you have so much time on your hands, you might try to go look it up. It's a simple, and fair, requirement in any debate that if it's your assertion to make, then it's your assertion to prove. Where's your proof? If there really was such important breaking news in support of K1MAN, you would be shouting it from the rooftops, and with the exact web addresses from the FCC, the ARRL, or other definitive source containing this valuable information (k1man.com doesn't count). The jaded readers of this newsgroup have seen many, many posters come traipsing through here over the years spouting all kinds of bizarre claims. Of course, with the caveat that the supporting evidence can't be revealed, or won't be believed, or is too hard to find, or even (as you are trying to assert in your case) is the responsibility of the skeptics to find. In 99.9% of these claims, we can confidently call "B.S." Either the claim is not true, or has been greatly exaggerated, and the evidence, or lack thereof, underscores this point. Facts: - There has been no FCC or court action since the upholding of K1MAN's $21,000 forfeiture in March of 2006: http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-663A1.html (Search Google with "site:fcc.gov Glenn Baxter") - The alleged case that overturns the FCC's Red Light Rule has turned out to be a fake. The quick removal of it from the K1MAN web site is a fairly clear, implicit acknowledgment of this fact. (See article . com by on rec.radio.amateur.policy.) -- 73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/ Finger for PGP Public Key |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
"an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Roger wrote: wrote in message ups.com... What is even funnier is you posting on company time and using your employer's servers. why? Not a good idea at all on Usenet and particularly not in this forum............ more threats? "More threats" implies alleged previous 'threats' were made by someone against something or someone. Such is *not* the case, never has been, never will be and is not now. Your reading skills are at a low level of comprehension, if you take what what was said as a 'threat.' What I did do, and you either purposely misstated or more likely did not comprehend, was to point out to the poster that this forum is a very dangerous place for him/her to be posting in from his/her employer's server and on company time. *YOU* are one of those entities which make this a dangerous place. All one has to do is review your nonstop daily spew of posts to this and many other Usenet groups. Now run along and study your grade school comprehension. Case in point. |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
"Paul W. Schleck" wrote in message ///// psycho-babble FLUSHED////// Hey Schleck, where's your "moderated" group? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Paul W. Schleck wrote: In "Harold" IHearVoices@glendale writes: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... W Hend wrote: Congratulations to K1MAN. Good men always win. if you are going to post you might try saying what happened Since you have so much time on your hands, you might try to go look it up. It's a simple, and fair, requirement in any debate that if it's your assertion to make, then it's your assertion to prove. Where's your proof? or at least evidence or in this case just making a meanful claim If there really was such important breaking news in support of K1MAN, you would be shouting it from the rooftops, and with the exact web addresses from the FCC, the ARRL, or other definitive source containing this valuable information (k1man.com doesn't count). The jaded readers of this newsgroup have seen many, many posters come traipsing through here over the years spouting all kinds of bizarre claims. Of course, with the caveat that the supporting evidence can't be revealed, or won't be believed, or is too hard to find, or even (as you are trying to assert in your case) is the responsibility of the skeptics to find. In 99.9% of these claims, we can confidently call "B.S." Either the claim is not true, or has been greatly exaggerated, and the evidence, or lack thereof, underscores this point. Facts: - There has been no FCC or court action since the upholding of K1MAN's $21,000 forfeiture in March of 2006: http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-663A1.html which is interesting (Search Google with "site:fcc.gov Glenn Baxter") - The alleged case that overturns the FCC's Red Light Rule has turned out to be a fake. The quick removal of it from the K1MAN web site is a fairly clear, implicit acknowledgment of this fact. (See article . com by on rec.radio.amateur.policy.) -- 73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/ Finger for PGP Public Key |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Roger wrote: What is even funnier is you posting on company time and using your employer's servers. Not a good idea at all on Usenet and particularly not in this forum............ If you need to complain to them, let me know via direct E-mail and I'll be happy to get you in touch with IT security. I seriously doubt he will care though. And yes... This is something folks on this forum have threatened me with before and it always comes to nothing. Yawn.... -= Bob =- |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
wrote: Roger wrote: What is even funnier is you posting on company time and using your employer's servers. Not a good idea at all on Usenet and particularly not in this forum............ If you need to complain to them, let me know via direct E-mail and I'll be happy to get you in touch with IT security. I seriously doubt he will care though. nice to have an understanding boss and you don't seem to spend a lot of time at either And yes... This is something folks on this forum have threatened me with before and it always comes to nothing. yep they are mostly full of it Yawn.... -= Bob =- |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
wrote in message ups.com... Roger wrote: What is even funnier is you posting on company time and using your employer's servers. Not a good idea at all on Usenet and particularly not in this forum............ If you need to complain to them, let me know via direct E-mail and I'll be happy to get you in touch with IT security. I seriously doubt he will care though. And yes... This is something folks on this forum have threatened me with before and it always comes to nothing. Yawn.... -= Bob =- Not my style, never has been. You are *assuming,* something similar to the other poster, that I 'might' or might not do. Speaking for myself, it is *not* my style to mess with people's employers, ever. HOWEVER, the point to be taken is that there ARE many in this forum who take great joy in doing exactly that. I am glad your employer has such a view, because very few employers now see it that way and believe work time and work equipment are for just that, work and not for playing on Usenet. Care to mention exactly who has threatened you in this forum? rog |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Roger wrote: Not my style, never has been. You are *assuming,* something similar to the other poster, that I 'might' or might not do. Care to mention exactly who has threatened you in this forum? Why bring it up if it's not your "style"? This was brought up a few times before, by folks who thought I was trying to hide who I was. I don't care to go though the archives to find out which alter ego of who it was because it doesn't matter. -= Bob =- |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
wrote in message oups.com... Why bring it up if it's not your "style"? Because I had a pt job delivering pizzas a couple years ago while I was working my way through college studying info tech. I did so good in the pizza business I was promoted to district manager and got a company car. Someone from this forum called my boss, used a bunch of filthy words and tried to get me fired. Only thing, he was from out of state and would not leave a name or phone number, so my boss ignored the complaints. rog |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Does anyone in this forum know how to join
BARF (Broadcasters Alliance to Retain Frequencies)? Do you know if they have an office here in California? rog |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
"Paul W. Schleck" wrote in message ... In "Harold" IHearVoices@glendale writes: "an old friend" wrote in message roups.com... W Hend wrote: Congratulations to K1MAN. Good men always win. if you are going to post you might try saying what happened Since you have so much time on your hands, you might try to go look it up. It's a simple, and fair, requirement in any debate that if it's your assertion to make, then it's your assertion to prove. Where's your proof? Who said anyone was 'debating' ? Is this a college course? Is this a political contest? If there really was such important breaking news in support of K1MAN, you would be shouting it from the rooftops, and with the exact web addresses from the FCC, the ARRL, or other definitive source containing this valuable information (k1man.com doesn't count). What are you talking about? I don't recall anyone giving you the option of deciding which source counts and which doesn't. Oh, Nevermind, I forgot, you are *in charge* ROTFLMAO! The jaded readers of this newsgroup have seen many, many posters come traipsing through here over the years spouting all kinds of bizarre claims. Of course, with the caveat ///remaining blather flushed/// You take yourself and everything else way too seriously. There is a time & place for everything. Facts: FACTS you say? The Democrat Party and other leftists like Bill & Hillary Clinton, Murtha, Kerry, Chuckie Schumer, Ted Kennedy, etc. taught us a long time ago that "facts" mean nothing. ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
Herb wrote: "Paul W. Schleck" wrote in message ... In "Harold" IHearVoices@glendale writes: "an old friend" wrote in message roups.com... W Hend wrote: Congratulations to K1MAN. Good men always win. if you are going to post you might try saying what happened Since you have so much time on your hands, you might try to go look it up. It's a simple, and fair, requirement in any debate that if it's your assertion to make, then it's your assertion to prove. Where's your proof? Who said anyone was 'debating' ? Is this a college course? Is this a political contest? it is a politcal contest If there really was such important breaking news in support of K1MAN, you would be shouting it from the rooftops, and with the exact web addresses from the FCC, the ARRL, or other definitive source containing this valuable information (k1man.com doesn't count). What are you talking about? I don't recall anyone giving you the option of deciding which source counts and which doesn't. Oh, Nevermind, I forgot, you are *in charge* ROTFLMAO! The jaded readers of this newsgroup have seen many, many posters come traipsing through here over the years spouting all kinds of bizarre claims. Of course, with the caveat ///remaining blather flushed/// You take yourself and everything else way too seriously. There is a time & place for everything. realy? Facts: FACTS you say? The Democrat Party and other leftists like Bill & Hillary Clinton, Murtha, Kerry, Chuckie Schumer, Ted Kennedy, etc. taught us a long time ago that "facts" mean nothing. ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
"Roger" wrote in message ... "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Lloyd wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Lloyd wrote: wrote in message i will upgrade when my blow jobs get better but i am really into being **** and ****ed on |
K1MAN Wins Another Round Against The FCC
an old friend wrote: i will upgrade when my blow jobs get better but i am really into being **** and ****ed on more cride fruad I will have MY extra when the FCC does as everyone knows they will |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com