Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brenda Ann wrote:
Perhaps the fact the secondarys being wired in bucking fashion has not as much to do with the function of the circuit itself as to assist in the prevention of the AC filament voltage from being introduced into the plate supply for the 1st. detector and 1st. No, the phasing of the two winding to be bucking IS the purpose of the circuit, and how it works. IF (otherwise it seems to me it would make a rather effective modulation transformer). Still would - that's what those capacitors across the primary are for. On the other hand, when DC saturates the secondary, wouldn't that tend to make the primary look like a direct short? There is no dc in the secondary - only the primary (the primary is to the right in this circuit). Remember TRANSFORMERS by nature are designed to operate on AC; DC only "messes them up". In this case - this circuit is intentionally designed to take advantage of that. Let's walk through it one more time - but this time secondaries first - then primary. First - let's think about the two (secondary) windings as a primary and secondary - after all - what windings are "called" has to due with their use, nothing more. If you hooked AC directly to one winding and a bulb directly to the other - the AC would couple from one winding to the other and light the bulb (leaving aside current density, etc. for the moment). If the two windings are 1:1 ratio - 6.3V applied to one would show up as 6.3V on the other. You could wire the bulb either way (i.e. "turn it around") and the current would flow through either the same phase as the primary (ignoring simple inductance) - or 180 degrees "out of phase". Point being - the two windings are the same - both oriented on the same core - and form a 1:1 ratio between them. As long as the core works as a transformer - the voltage couple between them will be (ignoring losses) 1:1 - the only "variable" would be the phasing - as determined by how the windings are hooked up. OK - now lets wire the two windings as shown in the schematic: Both windings on the same core; both having "equal effect" (1:1). Now when current (attempts) to pass through one winding - it "couples" to the other winding - which then generates an equal (but because of phasing) but opposite voltage - which tends to cancel (buck) the voltage applied to the first winding. Think of it as two batteries. If two batteries are wired "nose to nose" with a bulb in series with them - what happens to the bulb? Nothing. The two voltage "buck" each other - and (provided the batteries have an equal charge) equilibrium is reached - no current flows. Same thing with our two windings - WHEN the transformer's ability to couple is un-imparied. This "wild card" then - is what makes the circuit useful. This particular "transformer" is a special kind which unlike the "usual" transformer (which has modifications to help it "ignore" DC in the windings) - but rather is designed to indeed easily saturate the core when (sufficient) DC passes through one of it's windings. As the core of a transformer approaches saturation - it's ability to couple AC between the windings starts to fail; to the point that a fully saturated core couples virtually nothing. So - in this circuit - when the AGC has the RF / IF stages biased way down (on station) the B+ current draw is low - which passing through the primary (or control winding if you prefer) has little effect on the transformer's ability to couple AC between the other windings - in this case causing one winding to "buck" the other - and the bulb is dim. When the AGC falls - biasing up the gain (current) of the RF & IF stages - the current in the primary (or control) winding increases - pushing the core towards saturation - and the two windings in series with the bulb loose their coupling, reducing the induced bucking emf - and the bulb brightens. As you noted - when there is significant coupling between the two bulb windings - that will also couple to the primary (or control) winding. That's where the two capacitors come into play - they bypass any ripple impressed on that winding back down to the B+ rail - which of course has it's own filtering to ground. best regards... -- randy guttery A Tender Tale - a page dedicated to those Ships and Crews so vital to the United States Silent Service: http://tendertale.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dimmer Switches | Shortwave | |||
FS: 1930 Stewart Warner SW Converter | Swap | |||
Antenna Reactance Question | Antenna | |||
FA: Stewart-Warner R-1362-A Majestic Dial Tabletop Radio | Swap | |||
WTB or Trade: Stewart-Warner R-1362-A Cabinet or Chasis | Swap |