PING: Slow Code
 

PING: Slow Code
 

You both suck each other off. Jerks!
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:46:48 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

wrote in
oups.com:

Wanted to thank you for your posts about the code.

Because of you I just upgraded (Saturday) from technician to general. I
breezed the 5 wpm and am up to around 15wpm according to the W1AW
pratice broadcasts. I never would have bothered to learn CW if it
wasn't for you.

I know I only "need" 5 wpm but I am not going to upgrade to extra until
I can cpy 25 wpm SOLID!

This is in honor of my electronic elmer, Slow Code.

Thanks......

ROFLMAO!

.... And you've made me think of possibly joining CAP.


Testimonials like yours will bring a smile to every Real hams face. :-)

Just learn the code to 22 wpm. That would be a nice edge if you still had
to take a 20 wpm CW test. But if you can only get your speed up to 16 or
17 words per minute, upgrade anyway. We need good people like you on the
ham bands and on usenet. LOL

why do we ned more people that make snips and don't even have the guts
to sign their names?


73

SC
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

PING: Slow Code
 

wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 17:58:38 -0700, "Douche Bag"
wrote:

You both suck each other off. Jerks!
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:46:48 GMT, Slow Code wrote:
talking about yuorself abthat way

Drunk again, Marqueer?

PING: Slow Code
 

wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:46:48 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

wrote in
oups.com:

Wanted to thank you for your posts about the code.

Because of you I just upgraded (Saturday) from technician to general. I
breezed the 5 wpm and am up to around 15wpm according to the W1AW
pratice broadcasts. I never would have bothered to learn CW if it
wasn't for you.

I know I only "need" 5 wpm but I am not going to upgrade to extra until
I can cpy 25 wpm SOLID!

This is in honor of my electronic elmer, Slow Code.

Thanks......

ROFLMAO!

.... And you've made me think of possibly joining CAP.


Testimonials like yours will bring a smile to every Real hams face. :-)

Just learn the code to 22 wpm. That would be a nice edge if you still had
to take a 20 wpm CW test. But if you can only get your speed up to 16 or
17 words per minute, upgrade anyway. We need good people like you on the
ham bands and on usenet. LOL


73

SC
why do you want to kil the ARS?

Why do you "kill" the English language ?

PING: Slow Code
 

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
wrote:
why do you want to kil the ARS?

Why do you "kill" the English language ?
by the authority YOU gave me I can state the expert opiion you just lied

PING: Slow Code
 

an old freind wrote:

why do you want to kil the ARS?

Why do you want ham radio to be like CB?

why do you want Ham radio dead

-----------------REPLY FOLLOWS-----------------

Why do you ask these questions on an antenna newsgroup?

Bill, W6WRT


--

PING: Slow Code
 

PING: Slow Code
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in :

On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:46:48 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


SC
why do you want to kil the ARS?


Why do you want ham radio to be like CB?
I don't

why do you want Ham radio dead


SC

PING: Slow Code
 

Bill Turner wrote:
an old freind wrote:

why do you want to kil the ARS?

Why do you want ham radio to be like CB?

why do you want Ham radio dead

-----------------REPLY FOLLOWS-----------------

Why do you ask these questions on an antenna newsgroup?
I ask becuase I have given up on parring back the thread of the troll's

and if I answer i answer in all the NG not to break the threads

Bill, W6WRT


--

PING: Slow Code
 

an old friendless cocksucker wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
wrote:
why do you want to kil the ARS?

Why do you "kill" the English language ?
by the authority YOU gave me I can state the expert opiion you just lied

By your own example, you proved me right, imbecile. And that's the
general "opinion" on you.