RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Scanner (https://www.radiobanter.com/scanner/)
-   -   Public has almost no access to new police radios (https://www.radiobanter.com/scanner/117349-public-has-almost-no-access-new-police-radios.html)

zorba March 27th 07 11:10 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 
Abilene Reporter News

Public has almost no access to new police radios


By Blanca Cantu /
March 27, 2007

A new police and fire communications system designed to help emergency
crews stay in touch also means the news media has less access to
information about incidents affecting the public.

Abilene police and fire departments recently ditched an 18-year-old
dispatch system for a new $14 million system that has better
encryption capabilities and keeps many of the conversations people
using police scanners are accustomed to hearing off the air. Police
and fire officials began using the new system this month.

New radios purchased by the Reporter-News, KTXS-TV, KRBC-TV and KTAB-
TV that can pick up transmissions from the new system were programmed
by the city's communication services department. Abilene media can
listen to a police and fire dispatch channel and eight tactical fire
channels.

Before the city upgraded its communication system, the media and the
public could hear police and dispatchers chatter on multiple channels.
Now, the media has limited access - but the public has almost none.
Traditional police scanners cannot pick up transmissions on the new
system, meaning it must rely more on the media to report police and
fire news at a time when less information is available to the media on
police radios.

Jim Berry, assistant chief of the Abilene Police Department, said the
media no longer has access to the police service channels because the
department decided ''it's best for operations.'' Service channels are
used when officers in the field ask dispatchers to make a call for
them or check a license plate number.

Berry said the media's inaccessibility to the service channels helps
the department comply with an agreement the department has with the
Texas Department of Public Safety.

Information transmitted over the service channel can contain
information extracted from DPS' Texas Law Enforcement
Telecommunication system - and that is not public information, he
said.

''As a law enforcement officer, I cannot provide you with any
information that comes out of the TLET system,'' Berry said. ''Due to
the nature of police operations, there is information and
communications that you should not have access to.''

Berry, representatives of the fire department and the media met last
year to discuss radio accessibility. Berry said in the interest of
maintaining a good relationship with the media, the police department
granted the media access to the primary dispatch channel for patrol.

''We felt like that would meet your needs,'' Berry said. The agreement
was more than media in Wichita Falls initially received (see below).

At last year's meeting in Abilene, Scott Martin, chief photographer
for KTXS, said he asked for more access. But his request was denied.

News director Iain Munro said KTXS would like to have access to all
channels so that his staff can hear everything and judge things more
clearly.

''The last thing we want to do is get in the way of the police force
doing their job,'' Munro said.

The news station's photographers were concerned they wouldn't hear
certain things, he said. Not hearing chatter over the scanner forces
more calls to dispatchers, further tying up the lines of
communication.

''We want to be able to cover the story and do it so we're not
interfering with the police officers' jobs,'' Munro said.

Tom Vodak, news director for KRBC and KTAB, said the change in access
to police and fire communications hasn't affected the stations' news
coverage.

Is there a basis for complaints?

Joe Larsen, board member of the Freedom of Information Foundation of
Texas, said media outlets can't argue for more access to police
chatter on the basis of the Texas Public Information Act.

''Access has to rest on a statute or the Constitution,'' Larsen said.
''There is no statute that gives you access to a police scanner.''

When the Wichita Falls Police Department in 2005 upgraded from
traditional police radios that many people could hear with a police
scanner to the same digital radio system Abilene is using, it left the
media and the public in the dark and denied them access to all police
communication.

Two months later, the police department and the media in Wichita Falls
came to an agreement that allowed the media to listen to fire and
general police traffic, according to the Times Record News. The Times
Record News is owned by The E.W. Scripps Company, parent company of
the Reporter-News.

Abilene Assistant Police Chief Jim Berry said the decision to allow
the media to listen in on police dispatch calls would be in the best
interests of both the department and the media so that the good
relationship they have established with each other could be
maintained.

How do police communicate?

Abilene Police Department officers use about 25 ''talk groups'' when
they use their radios to talk to each other. A combination of digital
and traditional analog transmissions can be heard on police scanners.

Each police radio is programmed with a particular ''personality.''
Radio personalities have access to specific talk groups. Each channel
on the dial represents different talk groups. Talk groups are
accessible by officers in particular departments. For example,
detectives in the Criminal Investigation Division have multiple talk
groups that are not available to every police officer. Detectives,
patrol officers and other divisions have their own groups.

Copyright 2007, Abilene Reporter News. All Rights Reserved.


BDK March 28th 07 03:30 AM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 
In article .com,
says...
Abilene Reporter News

Public has almost no access to new police radios


By Blanca Cantu /

March 27, 2007

A new police and fire communications system designed to help emergency
crews stay in touch also means the news media has less access to
information about incidents affecting the public.

Abilene police and fire departments recently ditched an 18-year-old
dispatch system for a new $14 million system that has better
encryption capabilities and keeps many of the conversations people
using police scanners are accustomed to hearing off the air. Police
and fire officials began using the new system this month.

New radios purchased by the Reporter-News, KTXS-TV, KRBC-TV and KTAB-
TV that can pick up transmissions from the new system were programmed
by the city's communication services department. Abilene media can
listen to a police and fire dispatch channel and eight tactical fire
channels.

Before the city upgraded its communication system, the media and the
public could hear police and dispatchers chatter on multiple channels.
Now, the media has limited access - but the public has almost none.
Traditional police scanners cannot pick up transmissions on the new
system, meaning it must rely more on the media to report police and
fire news at a time when less information is available to the media on
police radios.

Jim Berry, assistant chief of the Abilene Police Department, said the
media no longer has access to the police service channels because the
department decided ''it's best for operations.'' Service channels are
used when officers in the field ask dispatchers to make a call for
them or check a license plate number.

Berry said the media's inaccessibility to the service channels helps
the department comply with an agreement the department has with the
Texas Department of Public Safety.

Information transmitted over the service channel can contain
information extracted from DPS' Texas Law Enforcement
Telecommunication system - and that is not public information, he
said.

''As a law enforcement officer, I cannot provide you with any
information that comes out of the TLET system,'' Berry said. ''Due to
the nature of police operations, there is information and
communications that you should not have access to.''

Berry, representatives of the fire department and the media met last
year to discuss radio accessibility. Berry said in the interest of
maintaining a good relationship with the media, the police department
granted the media access to the primary dispatch channel for patrol.

''We felt like that would meet your needs,'' Berry said. The agreement
was more than media in Wichita Falls initially received (see below).

At last year's meeting in Abilene, Scott Martin, chief photographer
for KTXS, said he asked for more access. But his request was denied.

News director Iain Munro said KTXS would like to have access to all
channels so that his staff can hear everything and judge things more
clearly.

''The last thing we want to do is get in the way of the police force
doing their job,'' Munro said.

The news station's photographers were concerned they wouldn't hear
certain things, he said. Not hearing chatter over the scanner forces
more calls to dispatchers, further tying up the lines of
communication.

''We want to be able to cover the story and do it so we're not
interfering with the police officers' jobs,'' Munro said.

Tom Vodak, news director for KRBC and KTAB, said the change in access
to police and fire communications hasn't affected the stations' news
coverage.

Is there a basis for complaints?

Joe Larsen, board member of the Freedom of Information Foundation of
Texas, said media outlets can't argue for more access to police
chatter on the basis of the Texas Public Information Act.

''Access has to rest on a statute or the Constitution,'' Larsen said.
''There is no statute that gives you access to a police scanner.''

When the Wichita Falls Police Department in 2005 upgraded from
traditional police radios that many people could hear with a police
scanner to the same digital radio system Abilene is using, it left the
media and the public in the dark and denied them access to all police
communication.

Two months later, the police department and the media in Wichita Falls
came to an agreement that allowed the media to listen to fire and
general police traffic, according to the Times Record News. The Times
Record News is owned by The E.W. Scripps Company, parent company of
the Reporter-News.

Abilene Assistant Police Chief Jim Berry said the decision to allow
the media to listen in on police dispatch calls would be in the best
interests of both the department and the media so that the good
relationship they have established with each other could be
maintained.

How do police communicate?

Abilene Police Department officers use about 25 ''talk groups'' when
they use their radios to talk to each other. A combination of digital
and traditional analog transmissions can be heard on police scanners.

Each police radio is programmed with a particular ''personality.''
Radio personalities have access to specific talk groups. Each channel
on the dial represents different talk groups. Talk groups are
accessible by officers in particular departments. For example,
detectives in the Criminal Investigation Division have multiple talk
groups that are not available to every police officer. Detectives,
patrol officers and other divisions have their own groups.

Copyright 2007, Abilene Reporter News. All Rights Reserved.



Is it just me, or does it seem like the author really doesn't quite
understand what they are writing about?

BDK

brad March 28th 07 07:03 AM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 
"BDK" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
says...
Abilene Reporter News

Public has almost no access to new police radios


Is it just me, or does it seem like the author really doesn't quite
understand what they are writing about?


Well it is not totally clear from the article- are they encrypting all but a
few talkgroups? If that is the case it certainly is one of the more
restrictive public safety radio systems around.




BDK March 28th 07 08:08 AM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 
In article ,
says...
"BDK" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
says...
Abilene Reporter News

Public has almost no access to new police radios


Is it just me, or does it seem like the author really doesn't quite
understand what they are writing about?


Well it is not totally clear from the article- are they encrypting all but a
few talkgroups? If that is the case it certainly is one of the more
restrictive public safety radio systems around.





I read it a couple of times and I can't tell if they think digital is
encrypted, or it really is encrypted.
www.radioreference.com would have
the info, if I could figure out what county Abilene is in.

BDK

Big Picture March 28th 07 02:28 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 
In Texas, west Texas that is. Why does a west Texas PD need for such a
system. Since 9-11 Millions has been spent for towns to upgrade to Hi tech
crap.
Everyone has gone Terrorist crazy.



"BDK" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
"BDK" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
says...
Abilene Reporter News

Public has almost no access to new police radios


Is it just me, or does it seem like the author really doesn't quite
understand what they are writing about?


Well it is not totally clear from the article- are they encrypting all
but a
few talkgroups? If that is the case it certainly is one of the more
restrictive public safety radio systems around.





I read it a couple of times and I can't tell if they think digital is
encrypted, or it really is encrypted.
www.radioreference.com would have
the info, if I could figure out what county Abilene is in.

BDK




BDK March 28th 07 06:35 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 
In article ,
says...
In Texas, west Texas that is. Why does a west Texas PD need for such a
system. Since 9-11 Millions has been spent for towns to upgrade to Hi tech
crap.
Everyone has gone Terrorist crazy.



"BDK" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
"BDK" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
says...
Abilene Reporter News

Public has almost no access to new police radios

Is it just me, or does it seem like the author really doesn't quite
understand what they are writing about?

Well it is not totally clear from the article- are they encrypting all
but a
few talkgroups? If that is the case it certainly is one of the more
restrictive public safety radio systems around.





I read it a couple of times and I can't tell if they think digital is
encrypted, or it really is encrypted.
www.radioreference.com would have
the info, if I could figure out what county Abilene is in.

BDK





I know where Abilene is, but I can't seem to find the county, and
without the county, radioreference is pretty useless.

BDK

Dave Ferguson[_2_] March 28th 07 06:42 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 

I know where Abilene is, but I can't seem to find the county, and
without the county, radioreference is pretty useless.

BDK



According to my mapping software it's Taylor County.

Dave



Dave Ferguson[_2_] March 28th 07 06:46 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 

"Dave Ferguson" wrote in message
link.net...

I know where Abilene is, but I can't seem to find the county, and
without the county, radioreference is pretty useless.

BDK



According to my mapping software it's Taylor County.

Dave


Looks like an EDACS Pro-voice system which needless to say there isn't a
scanner on the market to monitor that type of system. They have that here
in Johnston County, NC.

Dave



Alex Clayton March 28th 07 09:51 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 
"BDK" wrote in message
...
I read it a couple of times and I can't tell if they think digital is
encrypted, or it really is encrypted. www.radioreference.com would have
the info, if I could figure out what county Abilene is in.

BDK


RR is great for info but often is WAYYYY behind on changes. The system here
changed a couple years ago and RR still does not have the info right. A
couple people I know of tried to get them to update it, but it still shows
the wrong info. So they may or may not have the right info.
--
Without question, the greatest invention in the history of mankind is beer.
Oh, I grant you that the wheel was also a fine invention, but the wheel does
not go nearly as well with pizza.
--Dave Barry



BDK March 29th 07 07:50 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 
In article , alexx1400
@yahoo.com says...
"BDK" wrote in message
...
I read it a couple of times and I can't tell if they think digital is
encrypted, or it really is encrypted. www.radioreference.com would have
the info, if I could figure out what county Abilene is in.

BDK


RR is great for info but often is WAYYYY behind on changes. The system here
changed a couple years ago and RR still does not have the info right. A
couple people I know of tried to get them to update it, but it still shows
the wrong info. So they may or may not have the right info.


That's why I tell newbies to find a local scanner group. They know all
the stuff, a long time before it makes it to the public.

BDK

Mindraker May 18th 07 01:41 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 

"zorba" wrote in message
oups.com...
Abilene Reporter News

Abilene police and fire departments recently ditched an 18-year-old
dispatch system for a new $14 million system that has better
encryption capabilities and keeps many of the conversations people
using police scanners are accustomed to hearing off the air. Police
and fire officials began using the new system this month.

Copyright 2007, Abilene Reporter News. All Rights Reserved.


If the police can encrypt, then private citizens should be able to encrypt
with HAM radio, too. Oh? Oh? Don't like that, police? Then don't encrypt
your radio. There is something called "public records".



Porgy Tirebiter May 18th 07 08:07 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 

"Mindraker" wrote in message
...

"zorba" wrote in message
oups.com...
Abilene Reporter News

Abilene police and fire departments recently ditched an 18-year-old
dispatch system for a new $14 million system that has better
encryption capabilities and keeps many of the conversations people
using police scanners are accustomed to hearing off the air. Police
and fire officials began using the new system this month.

Copyright 2007, Abilene Reporter News. All Rights Reserved.


If the police can encrypt, then private citizens should be able to encrypt
with HAM radio, too. Oh? Oh? Don't like that, police? Then don't
encrypt your radio. There is something called "public records".

HORSE-****!!!
There are times that law enforcement NEED encrypted radios.
*YOU* are not entitled to their traffic. You do not have a need to know or a
right to know what is going on over police radio.If you are that interested,
the PD's "PIO" will disclose it to you when it's Ok to do so.
APCO-25 and GE's EDACS systems are NOT encrypted (they can order that
feature) but it's used to get more "Channels" or talk groups for an entire
city, makes for a more efficient system than having a frequency/repeater for
each dept.
Ma/Com's "OpenSky" system is ALL digital and you CAN NOT listen on that one.

Bottom line....if you can hear what is going on...chances are YOU DON'T NEED
TO!




krackula May 20th 07 05:41 AM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 
On Fri, 18 May 2007 08:41:20 -0400, "Mindraker" wrote:


"zorba" wrote in message
roups.com...
Abilene Reporter News

Abilene police and fire departments recently ditched an 18-year-old
dispatch system for a new $14 million system that has better
encryption capabilities and keeps many of the conversations people
using police scanners are accustomed to hearing off the air. Police
and fire officials began using the new system this month.

Copyright 2007, Abilene Reporter News. All Rights Reserved.


If the police can encrypt, then private citizens should be able to encrypt
with HAM radio, too. Oh? Oh? Don't like that, police? Then don't encrypt
your radio. There is something called "public records".


the times have changed and so have requirements for public service
radio systems. the FBI now requires ALL local police agencies that
use
NCIC ( all police departments nowadays ) to have their MDT style
systems encrypted. it's not optional , it's federal law. homeland
defense wants ALL police agency radios to be compatible with their
own encrypted national radio systems , in all departments nationwide.
it's not law yet, but it's in the works. they strongly feel that local
police should be encrypted to keep terrorists from eavesdropping.
their work is compromised if a local unencrypted police department
is revealing all their activities in an coordinated emergency
response event. ( that's their excuse anyway )

my local police departments have used 150mhz and 450 mhz
repeaters ( not trunked ) for a couple of decades. ALL local police
departments are deep into the process of switching to their already up
and running city wide wifi network for BOTH mdt data AND voice.
there is NO way to eavesdrop on encrypted wifi at the present time.

get used to it ..... change happens all the time and this is a strong
era of change for the scanning hobbyist. you will have to learn to
adapt to the change or just plain give up the hobby ( or what's left
of it ) ........ no one in the federal government and especially local
police departments cares if you think you have rights to listen in on
them or not. they never liked it in the old days and they are
gleeful that the time is coming that no one will be able to eavesdrop.
more and more, the police think it's them ( the boys in blue ) against
all the rest of us. citizens shouldn't be allowed to own guns and
citizens shouldn't be privileged to the inner workings of police
activities out in the streets. it's all for their own safety and
protection . I love scanning, but tell you the truth , they are
probably right ..........



k

Mindraker June 9th 07 01:28 AM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 

"krackula " wrote in message
...
On Fri, 18 May 2007 08:41:20 -0400, "Mindraker" wrote:


"zorba" wrote in message
groups.com...
Abilene Reporter News

Abilene police and fire departments recently ditched an 18-year-old
dispatch system for a new $14 million system that has better
encryption capabilities and keeps many of the conversations people
using police scanners are accustomed to hearing off the air. Police
and fire officials began using the new system this month.

Copyright 2007, Abilene Reporter News. All Rights Reserved.


If the police can encrypt, then private citizens should be able to encrypt
with HAM radio, too. Oh? Oh? Don't like that, police? Then don't
encrypt
your radio. There is something called "public records".


the times have changed and so have requirements for public service
radio systems. the FBI now requires ALL local police agencies that
use
NCIC ( all police departments nowadays ) to have their MDT style
systems encrypted. it's not optional , it's federal law. homeland
defense wants ALL police agency radios to be compatible with their
own encrypted national radio systems , in all departments nationwide.
it's not law yet, but it's in the works. they strongly feel that local
police should be encrypted to keep terrorists from eavesdropping.
their work is compromised if a local unencrypted police department
is revealing all their activities in an coordinated emergency
response event. ( that's their excuse anyway )

my local police departments have used 150mhz and 450 mhz
repeaters ( not trunked ) for a couple of decades. ALL local police
departments are deep into the process of switching to their already up
and running city wide wifi network for BOTH mdt data AND voice.
there is NO way to eavesdrop on encrypted wifi at the present time.

get used to it ..... change happens all the time and this is a strong
era of change for the scanning hobbyist. you will have to learn to
adapt to the change or just plain give up the hobby ( or what's left
of it ) ........ no one in the federal government and especially local
police departments cares if you think you have rights to listen in on
them or not. they never liked it in the old days and they are
gleeful that the time is coming that no one will be able to eavesdrop.
more and more, the police think it's them ( the boys in blue ) against
all the rest of us. citizens shouldn't be allowed to own guns and
citizens shouldn't be privileged to the inner workings of police
activities out in the streets. it's all for their own safety and
protection . I love scanning, but tell you the truth , they are
probably right ..........



k


This is ridiculous. Once again, police have a double standard. A nice
cover, too, in case they break the law. Sure, use the "in the name of
terrorism"-excuse, and they can do anything.
Arrgh!



jkale June 9th 07 04:50 AM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 

.......snipped ..............

activities out in the streets. it's all for their own safety and
protection . I love scanning, but tell you the truth , they are
probably right ..........



k


This is ridiculous. Once again, police have a double standard. A nice
cover, too, in case they break the law. Sure, use the "in the name of
terrorism"-excuse, and they can do anything.
Arrgh!



well you're right on the level of experience that you probably
interact with the public and the police ...... but look at it from
their perspective. day in and day out , the police only have the
opportunity to interact with the bottom feeders, scum suckers , and
dregs of humanity. they hardly ever associate with or interact with
the average John Q Public .... to the police , nearly all people (
that aren't wearing blue ) that they see are human waste. people
are shooting them in the face for a traffic ticket stop , they are
ducking bullets or fists around every corner and up every block. sad
as it is, that's what this world has come to. neighborhoods are
riddled with registered sex offenders ( never mind the ones that
haven't been caught yet ) , cars are stolen by the 1000s from all
neighborhoods , car chases are rampant , bank robberies happen
all the time , murders are a daily thing ( more than one a day in
this part of the country ) and THATS only a small part of the story !

If I was a cop, I wouldn't want the possibility of the " perps "
having any " inside " information or radio tip offs any more than
possible. if that hacked off some general citizens or made them start
talking " police conspiracy " then I'd be tempted to say " bring that
hacked off citizen down here on the beat with the boys in blue and
duck a few bullets , chase a few bank robbers or sex offenders and see
what they thought about it all afterwards.

do you want the sex offenders to be able to monitor MDT and police
communications ? ...... what about the drug dealers and pimps , or
maybe the gang bangers while they invade your home or rape your wife
?? if YOU do it, you gotta let everyone do it as well .......
forget about the terrorists , homeland security is a WHOLE lot more in
jeopardy from home grown crime right here , all around us. think
it's so important for YOU to listen in that " all the perps " should
be able to as well ??

I wanna listen in , but I know it's for the best if NO ONE does. it's
like a lot of things in this world that the actions of a few have
screwed up things for the rest of us ..... trouble is there is WAY
more than a few bangers, rapists, murders, car thieves, and robbers
lurking out there these days .... WAY more than a few.

do cops screw up ?? .... sure they do ..... everyone does from time to
time ..... but think what your world would be like without them
........ think long and hard . they aren't perfect , but they work
24 hours a day to make our lives a little bit better and most do a
pretty go job in the process.

joe friday June 9th 07 04:54 AM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 


snipped .........

do you want the sex offenders to be able to monitor MDT and police
communications ? ...... what about the drug dealers and pimps , or
maybe the gang bangers while they invade your home or rape your wife
?? if YOU do it, you gotta let everyone do it as well .......
forget about the terrorists , homeland security is a WHOLE lot more in
jeopardy from home grown crime right here , all around us. think
it's so important for YOU to listen in that " all the perps " should
be able to as well ??

I wanna listen in , but I know it's for the best if NO ONE does. it's
like a lot of things in this world that the actions of a few have
screwed up things for the rest of us ..... trouble is there is WAY
more than a few bangers, rapists, murders, car thieves, and robbers
lurking out there these days .... WAY more than a few.

do cops screw up ?? .... sure they do ..... everyone does from time to
time ..... but think what your world would be like without them
....... think long and hard . they aren't perfect , but they work
24 hours a day to make our lives a little bit better and most do a
pretty go job in the process.



WoW ... after I reread this I realized that I thought I'd heard
something like this somewhere before ........ hummmmmmmm .......
Dummm De Dummmm Dummmm ....... in a minute the results
of that thought !!!


jf


Mindraker June 9th 07 10:37 AM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 

"jkale" wrote in message
...

......snipped ..............

activities out in the streets. it's all for their own safety and
protection . I love scanning, but tell you the truth , they are
probably right ..........



k


This is ridiculous. Once again, police have a double standard. A nice
cover, too, in case they break the law. Sure, use the "in the name of
terrorism"-excuse, and they can do anything.
Arrgh!



well you're right on the level of experience that you probably
interact with the public and the police ...... but look at it from
their perspective. day in and day out , the police only have the
opportunity to interact with the bottom feeders, scum suckers , and
dregs of humanity. they hardly ever associate with or interact with
the average John Q Public .... to the police , nearly all people (
that aren't wearing blue ) that they see are human waste. people
are shooting them in the face for a traffic ticket stop , they are
ducking bullets or fists around every corner and up every block. sad
as it is, that's what this world has come to. neighborhoods are
riddled with registered sex offenders ( never mind the ones that
haven't been caught yet ) , cars are stolen by the 1000s from all
neighborhoods , car chases are rampant , bank robberies happen
all the time , murders are a daily thing ( more than one a day in
this part of the country ) and THATS only a small part of the story !

If I was a cop, I wouldn't want the possibility of the " perps "
having any " inside " information or radio tip offs any more than
possible. if that hacked off some general citizens or made them start
talking " police conspiracy " then I'd be tempted to say " bring that
hacked off citizen down here on the beat with the boys in blue and
duck a few bullets , chase a few bank robbers or sex offenders and see
what they thought about it all afterwards.

do you want the sex offenders to be able to monitor MDT and police
communications ? ...... what about the drug dealers and pimps , or
maybe the gang bangers while they invade your home or rape your wife
?? if YOU do it, you gotta let everyone do it as well .......
forget about the terrorists , homeland security is a WHOLE lot more in
jeopardy from home grown crime right here , all around us. think
it's so important for YOU to listen in that " all the perps " should
be able to as well ??

I wanna listen in , but I know it's for the best if NO ONE does. it's
like a lot of things in this world that the actions of a few have
screwed up things for the rest of us ..... trouble is there is WAY
more than a few bangers, rapists, murders, car thieves, and robbers
lurking out there these days .... WAY more than a few.

do cops screw up ?? .... sure they do ..... everyone does from time to
time ..... but think what your world would be like without them
....... think long and hard . they aren't perfect , but they work
24 hours a day to make our lives a little bit better and most do a
pretty go job in the process.


You make some valid points there. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt
that you live in a city where police are actually fighting crime.
Unfortunately, in my city, the police are rather corrupt, partially not
their own fault, but because of my town's city council. I can't walk to
work without bumping into a drug dealer downtown begging me for
money/cigarettes/etc., but if I take a stroll in the ritzi white upper class
district, it is crawling with cops (the excuse is that they are doing "radar
training"). If you don't want people to talk "police conspiracy", show your
hand to the public, and don't hide.



joe friday June 10th 07 02:44 AM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 


do cops screw up ?? .... sure they do ..... everyone does from time to
time ..... but think what your world would be like without them
....... think long and hard . they aren't perfect , but they work
24 hours a day to make our lives a little bit better and most do a
pretty go job in the process.


You make some valid points there. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt
that you live in a city where police are actually fighting crime.
Unfortunately, in my city, the police are rather corrupt, partially not
their own fault, but because of my town's city council. I can't walk to
work without bumping into a drug dealer downtown begging me for
money/cigarettes/etc., but if I take a stroll in the ritzi white upper class
district, it is crawling with cops (the excuse is that they are doing "radar
training"). If you don't want people to talk "police conspiracy", show your
hand to the public, and don't hide.



ha ah a ..... it's kinda opposite what you see around here. I admit
that I do live in the north side ( upscale ) part of my town , but
this town is nationally famous for having the 2nd highest national
poverty rate ( 2nd to Cleveland , Ohio and this is California ) , it
has the highest car theft rate in the west , and the highest amount
of people out of work and not looking for employment ( about 237,000
people unemployed and not looking for work ) . more than 57% of the
town is latino and 17% asian , the rest mixed including whites.
it has an estimated 170,000 illegal immigrants living here as well.

the cops are thick as flies down in the less fortunate parts of town
but nearly invisible up here in the north side. I will say that I'm
impressed with them tho .... as I called them about someone in a
neighbor's yard a few weeks ago ( my neighbor that had lost his keys
and was trying to break into his own house ) ... and in less than 3
minutes there were 3 patrol cars and a helicopter here on scene.
people in the less fortunate parts of town complain they can't get a
cop to come for 1 to 2 hours and that ' we " get special treatment
...... perhaps I'm inclined to agree with those complaints as I
certainly got fast service when I called. this town has over 16,000
registered gang bangers and thousands more " associates " ....
and the local cops have waged " war " on gangs with full out
efforts to get rid of them.

cops get shot and killed around here quite frequently ( usually by
bank robbers and gang bangers ) and they have a very messy job in
these parts of the country. I wouldn't trade places with one of them
, no matter what the pay they receive. they earn every penny of it
........ the hard way.

Mindraker June 10th 07 11:27 AM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 

"joe friday" wrote in message
...


ha ah a ..... it's kinda opposite what you see around here. I admit
that I do live in the north side ( upscale ) part of my town , but
this town is nationally famous for having the 2nd highest national
poverty rate ( 2nd to Cleveland , Ohio and this is California ) , it
has the highest car theft rate in the west , and the highest amount
of people out of work and not looking for employment ( about 237,000
people unemployed and not looking for work ) . more than 57% of the
town is latino and 17% asian , the rest mixed including whites.
it has an estimated 170,000 illegal immigrants living here as well.

the cops are thick as flies down in the less fortunate parts of town
but nearly invisible up here in the north side. I will say that I'm
impressed with them tho .... as I called them about someone in a
neighbor's yard a few weeks ago ( my neighbor that had lost his keys
and was trying to break into his own house ) ... and in less than 3
minutes there were 3 patrol cars and a helicopter here on scene.
people in the less fortunate parts of town complain they can't get a
cop to come for 1 to 2 hours and that ' we " get special treatment
..... perhaps I'm inclined to agree with those complaints as I
certainly got fast service when I called. this town has over 16,000
registered gang bangers and thousands more " associates " ....
and the local cops have waged " war " on gangs with full out
efforts to get rid of them.

cops get shot and killed around here quite frequently ( usually by
bank robbers and gang bangers ) and they have a very messy job in
these parts of the country. I wouldn't trade places with one of them
, no matter what the pay they receive. they earn every penny of it
....... the hard way.


I live in the upscale part of town, too, but even then, I can't get a cop
even when I need one, unless they are raising funds. I had a pair of cops
come TO MY DOOR with the "fraternal order of police"-crap. I once waited
FOUR HOURS for a stray dog call, and finally brought the dog to the local
park ranger on foot (I can't drive). My friend had his van broken into, and
the answer from the police was "we're too busy".
Where do you live? I live in Asheville, NC.



Mindraker June 10th 07 09:34 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:27:54 -0400, "Mindraker" wrote:

I live in the upscale part of town, too, but even then, I can't get a cop
even when I need one, unless they are raising funds. I had a pair of cops
come TO MY DOOR with the "fraternal order of police"-crap. I once waited
FOUR HOURS for a stray dog call, and finally brought the dog to the local
park ranger on foot (I can't drive). My friend had his van broken into,
and
the answer from the police was "we're too busy".
Where do you live? I live in Asheville, NC.


2 events that are hardly 911 calls. Stray dog, you should have called animal
control. If the robbers weren't there tearing the van open when you called.
it's just a cold case.

Who said we called 911?



joe friday June 11th 07 05:32 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 


I live in the upscale part of town, too, but even then, I can't get a cop
even when I need one, unless they are raising funds. I had a pair of cops
come TO MY DOOR with the "fraternal order of police"-crap. I once waited
FOUR HOURS for a stray dog call, and finally brought the dog to the local
park ranger on foot (I can't drive). My friend had his van broken into, and
the answer from the police was "we're too busy".
Where do you live? I live in Asheville, NC.



I lived in Spring Lake for about a year ( 82nd airborne ) but that
was a long time ago. it always seems like places back east are
" enormously " different than living out here. seemingly nicer and
much quieter in many ways. NC has also grown a lot since I lived
there as well.

I live in a smallish ( agricultural ) town for this state , only a
little over a million people here ( legal ones , maybe another
300K total illegals in the county ) . many people live here
for the ( hahahah ) lower relative living costs and commute to the
mega metros for work ( 10's of millions ) . I think the S.F. metro
is about the same size as the entire population of NC and the L.A.
metro probably about 2 1/2 times the S.F. metro. of course add
another 28 to 36 % on top of those values for the illegals.
we have WAY too many people and WAY too much over crowding
here and as a result we have the typical policing issues that go with
all those people.

here in my town we have " traffic " task forces that set up road
checks in different parts of town every weekend and during the week as
well. during an average traffic check point , they get around 10 -
12 drunk drivers and tow about 150 cars. one out of every 4 and
sometimes one out of every 3 cars they check have insurance, D.L.
or registration issues and they ticket the driver and impound their
car until they fix the problem. this and they only stop every 4th or
5th car because of the traffic backing up . h aha hah aha
I've noticed that they do seem to " wave through " older drivers in
expensive cars most of the time and don't mess with those types of
vehicles, but if you've got an older , beat , car ...... look out jack
!! the city does have " swarms " of motorcycle ( 10, 15, 20 at a
time ) cops that will blanket parts of town and hammer drivers.
our part of town seems like a favorite place for them to " hang " too
! ya yahahah a we need it tho, drivers out here have become
increasingly " psycho " and people blatantly and intentionally pull
out in front of you, run red lights , and run stop signs ( to mention
a few ) to such a degree that I can't explain how bad it's gotten.
if I told you, you wouldn't believe me , but it's totally shocking
how driving quality has degenerated here. it's far worse , too, here
than in the larger metros for some reason. just too many of the " ME ,
get the hell out of my way " people in these parts.


think about this too .........

where you live there are lush wild forests and beautiful fauna.
a nice , natural, outdoors type place at the edge of the local
forested mountains.

where I live is a little bit different. it's filled with lush green
as well. palm trees, citrus, pit fruit, grapes, and towns filled
with every imaginable fragrant flower and plant , this ....all year
around .... also at the edge of lush mountain giant redwood
forests ....

nearly a paradise of color and fragrance. the most beautiful place
man can " imagine " to live in ..... this is the place. kewl huh
???..... WELL maybe not ........

if " man " didn't live here and irrigate the place , it's natural
state is a wide deep ( 14,600' mountains on the east side,
1,800' mountains and ocean on the west side ) TOTALLY
barren desert with almost no plants of any kind. maybe a few
tumbleweeds and scraggly oak trees in the few wet spots.

" the most beautiful place man can " imagine " to live in " is the
key part of this. this entire place is TOTALLY synthetic. NONE of
these exotic plants would be here if man didn't bring them here and
plant them. NONE of these plants ( for the most part ) would grow
together in the wild , anywhere on the planet. man imagines this
place and creates it from their desire to be surrounded by fragrance
and lush tropical plants. every where you look , everything you see
is a totally manmade , " created " , imaginary environment. perfect
lush green little golf course type yards, places filled with massive
palm trees, fragrant coastal juniper, magnolia, dozens of kinds of
eucalyptus, loquat and giant fern trees cover the landscape. a
complete " synthetic " paradise !!! when I sit out back on my
veranda in my jacuzzi ( hah aha ) every day and look out at the
neighborhood , I see quite a different environment than people back
east see. it's beautiful for sure, the flower and tree fragrances are
fantastic ... BUT ....
it's " all that " ... except when you think about it , there is a
slightly ODD tilt to it all ....... it's a little bit twisted if you
allow your mind go there , isn't it ! yayayay ahah ah ah a
California IS different for sure ...... but is that necessarily a
good thing ??? hummmmmmm ...


Mindraker June 11th 07 06:00 PM

Public has almost no access to new police radios
 

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:34:44 -0400, "Mindraker" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:27:54 -0400, "Mindraker" wrote:

I live in the upscale part of town, too, but even then, I can't get a cop
even when I need one, unless they are raising funds. I had a pair of cops
come TO MY DOOR with the "fraternal order of police"-crap. I once waited
FOUR HOURS for a stray dog call, and finally brought the dog to the local
park ranger on foot (I can't drive). My friend had his van broken into,
and
the answer from the police was "we're too busy".
Where do you live? I live in Asheville, NC.


2 events that are hardly 911 calls. Stray dog, you should have called
animal
control. If the robbers weren't there tearing the van open when you called.
it's just a cold case.

Who said we called 911?

You called someone on both cases. Your words. plus the reference 911 =
urgent. Of which neither one was a 911 call.
The van, only thing you'd do is fill out a stolen property report [at the
station].
Both cases you expected more than what the police are paid to do. And if as
you say they're stretched to breaking with a high crime area, the answers
make perfect sense.

Your misintepretation. Their website even gives a number to call in the
event of stray animals. Get over it, you misread the post.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com