http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com/

On Jan 20, 8:36 am, ShootEveryDemocRAT
wrote:
I have an HD receiver and think it is great. Works fine for me. The AM
signal is beautiful and I like the dual channels on FM. I'm really happy
with it.



IBOCcrock wrote:
http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's nice, but HD doesn't even work:

"Is HD Radio Toast?"

"There are serious issues of coverage. Early adopters who bought HD
radios report serious drop-outs, poor coverage, and interference. The
engineers of Ibiquity may argue otherwise and defend the system, but
the industry has a serious PR problem with the very people we need to
get the word out on HD... In other words, everything you can find on
the regular FM dial... The word has already gotten out about HD Radio.
People who have already bought an HD Radio are telling others of their
experience (mostly bad) and no amount of marketing will reverse this."

http://www.fmqb.com/article.asp?id=487772

And, the HD channels are just clever reworks of the same bland
material found on the main analog channels:

"HD Hypocrisy"

"Here's a few more reasons why only iBiquity and a few clueless radio
group heads could make a big thing out of HD radio tagging... The very
damn radio stations that broadcast in HD offer no programming worth
listening to. HD Radio is a virtual sewer of formats owners don't want
on their terrestrial frequencies and other assorted garbage that no
one sane would listen to -- let alone spend money for new radios --
tagging or not."

http://insidemusicmedia.blogspot.com...hypocrisy.html

Enjoy!