RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Scanner (https://www.radiobanter.com/scanner/)
-   -   Which Bearcat: bc895xlt, bc9000xlt, or bc 780xlt? (https://www.radiobanter.com/scanner/34494-bearcat-bc895xlt-bc9000xlt-bc-780xlt.html)

steelguitar October 5th 03 11:03 PM

Which Bearcat: bc895xlt, bc9000xlt, or bc 780xlt?
 
I don't care about trunking, mainly wide coverage including wfm, selectable
step sizes, attenuation, and delay for each channel, fast searching, nice
display, and good audio :)

thx

bob




Woolridge October 6th 03 12:08 AM

780 for sure.

"steelguitar" wrote in message
ink.net...
I don't care about trunking, mainly wide coverage including wfm,

selectable
step sizes, attenuation, and delay for each channel, fast searching, nice
display, and good audio :)

thx

bob






CommCtr1 October 6th 03 02:27 AM

actually the 9000 covers the 700mhz band, the 780 does not
for programming the 780 is hands down the best scanner on the market.
however my 9000xlt has been my workhorse for about 7 yrs and it will be
until analog is gone all together
i had a 895 and would never buy another
the big difference between the 9000,780 and 895 is that the mode is not
selectable on the 895, it is band dependent, meaning 108-136AM, 136-174NFM,
etc.
you can not manually select a mode.

Lou

3-BC780XLT's
1-BC9000XLT w/tone board
1-Icom R1
1-IC706MKIIG




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com