I know pro95 and pro93 are almost the same except in the number of channels
.. Anything else differ? Are they better than Pro92 and Pro 94?

I have a Pro95 and a Pro 92. The 95 is certainly easier to program,
only control channels need to be entered. The 92 does PL tone
decoding, and will allow you to filter some transmissions,
particularlly handy for business band monitoring.

In a side by side comparison, both tracked very well. Both hit on
transmissions that the other missed occasionally. I'm not sure if I'm
lucky, but my 92 doesn't seem weak in the 800MHz band as others have
reported. Both tracked identically with a distant TRS.

I've had both for a few weeks, and still haven't decided which one I
can live without.

..ps the Pro 94 has no text tags. Following a large system would be
pain.

In article 7ITYb.354233$na.522955@attbi_s04, Jack
wrote:

I know pro95 and pro93 are almost the same except in the number of channels
. Anything else differ? Are they better than Pro92 and Pro 94?

Having owned all I put my vote on the 95. Get the cheap cable and the
free software control program on the net and you are set. Really is a
great scanner.

K


On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:46:59 GMT, "Jack" wrote:

I know pro95 and pro93 are almost the same except in the number of channels
. Anything else differ? Are they better than Pro92 and Pro 94?

Thanks a bunch