RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Scanner (https://www.radiobanter.com/scanner/)
-   -   Winradio WR-1550e or Icom PCR-1000 (https://www.radiobanter.com/scanner/35728-winradio-wr-1550e-icom-pcr-1000-a.html)

Dwayne May 8th 04 12:15 AM

Winradio WR-1550e or Icom PCR-1000
 
Going to Dayton next week and I am wondering which of these radios is
the best bet to get. I don't hear much talk about winradio anymore. Will
the Icom trunktrack like the winradio does?
--
-----------
Dwayne
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BC895/

David Clark May 8th 04 03:36 AM

On Fri, 07 May 2004 23:15:13 GMT, Dwayne wrote:

Going to Dayton next week and I am wondering which of these radios is
the best bet to get. I don't hear much talk about winradio anymore.


And where have you been hiding? :-) It is a well known fact that Icom
does not support the PCR1000 anymore and is letting it quietly die,
while WinRadio keeps releasing new products all the time. Compare
their Web sites and you shall see...

Will the Icom trunktrack like the winradio does?


Maybe only with third party software, on which Icom is now relying
entirely.

I have both PCR1000 and WR1550e, and the Icom has been collecting dust
since I acquired the WinRadio - much better.

David


Dwayne May 8th 04 04:08 AM

In article 409c4668.6527115@news-server, says...

And where have you been hiding?


I haven't been hiding anywhere. I just never looked into these radios
until now.

Maybe only with third party software, on which Icom is now relying
entirely.


So are you saying that there is software out there for trunking?

I have both PCR1000 and WR1550e, and the Icom has been collecting dust
since I acquired the WinRadio - much better.


Then you should sell me the Icom for cheap :) Say $200
--
-----------
Dwayne
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BC895/

Panzer240 May 8th 04 07:06 AM

Dwayne wrote in
.net:

In article 409c4668.6527115@news-server, says...

And where have you been hiding?


I haven't been hiding anywhere. I just never looked into these radios
until now.

Maybe only with third party software, on which Icom is now relying
entirely.


So are you saying that there is software out there for trunking?



I have had great success using Trunk Tracker for the PCR-1000. Works just
fine :)

Take a look at :

http://104452.home.icq.com/trunkpcr/TrunkPcr.html

Been a while since an update has been released, but this version works
fine for me. :)




--
Panzer


Spectre May 9th 04 04:03 PM

Here is one thing that bothers the hell out of me why are these receiver
cards built on ISA cards instead of PCI cards? Who the hell has an ISA card
slot in their computer? I mean come on PCI-X is almost here across the
board. ISA is ancient technology and its what keeps be from getting this
type of receiver.

"Panzer240" wrote in message
...
Dwayne wrote in
.net:

In article 409c4668.6527115@news-server, says...

And where have you been hiding?


I haven't been hiding anywhere. I just never looked into these radios
until now.

Maybe only with third party software, on which Icom is now relying
entirely.


So are you saying that there is software out there for trunking?



I have had great success using Trunk Tracker for the PCR-1000. Works just
fine :)

Take a look at :

http://104452.home.icq.com/trunkpcr/TrunkPcr.html

Been a while since an update has been released, but this version works
fine for me. :)




--
Panzer




Bill Crocker May 9th 04 04:52 PM

Neither the WR-1550e, or the PCR-1000, are built on ISA cards. Both these
models are external devices, that communicate to the computer via an RS232
serial port.

WiNRADiO does offer the internal card version, and as you say, it is on an
ISA card. Icom, to my knowledge, never offered an internal one. WiNRAiO
does make a shortwave receiver, on a PCI card...finally!

Icom ships the PCR-1000 with Bonito's software now.

I've always preferred the PCR-1000, over the WR-1550e. From a software
point, they both could use improvement.

Bill Crocker



"Spectre" wrote in message
. ..
Here is one thing that bothers the hell out of me why are these receiver
cards built on ISA cards instead of PCI cards? Who the hell has an ISA

card
slot in their computer? I mean come on PCI-X is almost here across the
board. ISA is ancient technology and its what keeps be from getting this
type of receiver.





Panzer240 May 9th 04 06:03 PM

"Bill Crocker" wrote in
:



Icom ships the PCR-1000 with Bonito's software now.

I've always preferred the PCR-1000, over the WR-1550e. From a software
point, they both could use improvement.

Bill Crocker


The Bonito software is cack IMHO. No support, many bugs and definitely
some of the worst available for the PCR-1000. Icom software while berift
of features, at least works ;) There are others out there, TakPCR e.g.
that are much better. But I do agree there is room for improvement. Mostly
it is a fuyn radio to have amd play woth and there are some neat things
you can do with it and some of the sound card software out there. PEople
get a kick out of seeing the digital pager messages flowing by on the
screen for example ;)




--
Panzer


David Clark May 10th 04 12:18 PM

On Sun, 9 May 2004 11:52:59 -0400, "Bill Crocker"
wrote:

Neither the WR-1550e, or the PCR-1000, are built on ISA cards. Both these
models are external devices, that communicate to the computer via an RS232
serial port.


The WR-1550e also has an additional PCMCIA connector for which you can
buy an optional PCMCIA adapter. There is also an optional USB adapter.

I've always preferred the PCR-1000, over the WR-1550e. From a software
point, they both could use improvement.


Everything could surely use improvement, but comparing the Icom
software with WinRadio software is like comparing a bicycle to a
Mercedes. There is simply no comparison: The Icom software is crude
and primitive, almost childish. It would surely look great on a chunky
graphics Commodore computer of the early eighties.
And has Icom finally managed to make it work on Windows XP?

WinRadio software is beautifully crafted and works perfectly on all
versions of Windows (and has been working perfectly on Windows 2000
and XP since the day they were introduced). You get plenty of ongoing
support, many options (digital signal processing, decoding, trunking,
database), dozens of free plug-ins for all sorts of applications
(http://xrs.winradio.com), Linux support, Mac support, and even a free
"Radio Basic" interpreter (http://www.rbasic.com) . Which other radio
manufacturer gives you all that?

Sure, any additional improvement would always be great. But all this
is already a thousand times more impressive than whatever crap Icom
has managed to provide so far, for their one and only PC-based
product.

David


Dwayne May 10th 04 09:38 PM

On Sat, 08 May 2004 03:08:20 GMT, Dwayne wrote:

In article 409c4668.6527115@news-server, says...

And where have you been hiding?


I haven't been hiding anywhere. I just never looked into these radios
until now.

Maybe only with third party software, on which Icom is now relying
entirely.


So are you saying that there is software out there for trunking?

I have both PCR1000 and WR1550e, and the Icom has been collecting dust
since I acquired the WinRadio - much better.


Then you should sell me the Icom for cheap :) Say $200


David I guess your no answer means that you dont want to take me up on
my offer.

Ken May 10th 04 10:19 PM

I've got an Icom PCR1000 running under Windows XP Pro and it works
flawlessly! I used the same software under Win95 & 98 with no problems at
all. I also have trunking, using TrunkPCR software working flawlessly on
the same XP machine. I've tried other software programs and always ended up
going back to the icom software. With the DSP module installed and a
discone antenna the Icom is hard to beat.



David Clark May 11th 04 03:05 PM

On Mon, 10 May 2004 20:38:16 GMT, Dwayne wrote:

On Sat, 08 May 2004 03:08:20 GMT, Dwayne wrote:

In article 409c4668.6527115@news-server, says...

And where have you been hiding?


I haven't been hiding anywhere. I just never looked into these radios
until now.

Maybe only with third party software, on which Icom is now relying
entirely.


So are you saying that there is software out there for trunking?

I have both PCR1000 and WR1550e, and the Icom has been collecting dust
since I acquired the WinRadio - much better.


Then you should sell me the Icom for cheap :) Say $200


David I guess your no answer means that you dont want to take me up on
my offer.


I do actually. :-) Your post did remind me that I planned to get rid
of it. I no longer use it. But I think I'd prefer to do it via eBay. I
am going away for a few days and will do it upon my return.

David


Dwayne May 11th 04 03:48 PM

In article 40a0dce2.11271848@news-server, says...
I do actually. :-) Your post did remind me that I planned to get rid
of it. I no longer use it. But I think I'd prefer to do it via eBay. I
am going away for a few days and will do it upon my return.

David

Why bother with ebay when it will just cost you money to place the add?
I can do paypal or postal money order if you like.
--
-----------
Dwayne
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BC895/

Panzer240 May 11th 04 04:23 PM

"Ken" wrote in
:

I've got an Icom PCR1000 running under Windows XP Pro and it works
flawlessly! I used the same software under Win95 & 98 with no problems
at all. I also have trunking, using TrunkPCR software working
flawlessly on the same XP machine. I've tried other software programs
and always ended up going back to the icom software. With the DSP
module installed and a discone antenna the Icom is hard to beat.




Same experience here for the most part. Same os etc. etc. I was intersted
in your comment about the UT-106. For the most aprt any info I couild find
about it indicated it was a waste of money in the PCR-1000. I would
apprecite comments pro and con about this device as I have not purchaed
one based on all the negative comment I have found regarding it.


--
Panzer


Volker Tonn May 11th 04 09:02 PM

Panzer240 schrieb:


Same experience here for the most part. Same os etc. etc. I was intersted
in your comment about the UT-106. For the most aprt any info I couild find
about it indicated it was a waste of money in the PCR-1000. I would
apprecite comments pro and con about this device as I have not purchaed
one based on all the negative comment I have found regarding it.


If you prefer BC-listening on shortwave this thing is real nice for its
multi-tone automatic notch and a steal for its price compared to DSP
based filters having this feature.
The noice cancelling function was not very impressive IMHO.

Sadly it lacks of peak, doublepeak and passband filtering for digital modes.

Take your choice.

PS: no need for x-post, f'up set.


Ken May 12th 04 03:58 AM

Howdy Panzer, the UT-106 is worth every cent. I was reluctant and waited
before buying one. But now I'm really glad I did. I wouldn't live w/o it
now. It makes listening a real pleasure and much less of chore. It makes
your noise level completely adjustable and really does work. Before I
bought one, I looked into other dsp software options etc, & noticed that all
the bad I had heard was from someone trying to sell me something else. You
won't regret buying the UT-106. IMHO

Ken

"Panzer240" wrote in message
...
"Ken" wrote in
:

I've got an Icom PCR1000 running under Windows XP Pro and it works
flawlessly! I used the same software under Win95 & 98 with no problems
at all. I also have trunking, using TrunkPCR software working
flawlessly on the same XP machine. I've tried other software programs
and always ended up going back to the icom software. With the DSP
module installed and a discone antenna the Icom is hard to beat.




Same experience here for the most part. Same os etc. etc. I was intersted
in your comment about the UT-106. For the most aprt any info I couild find
about it indicated it was a waste of money in the PCR-1000. I would
apprecite comments pro and con about this device as I have not purchaed
one based on all the negative comment I have found regarding it.


--
Panzer




George Blomfield May 15th 04 11:58 AM

Just got the Winradio WR-1550e at Dayton Hamvention. It's AWESOME!!!

George



On Wed, 12 May 2004 02:58:53 GMT, "Ken" wrote:

Howdy Panzer, the UT-106 is worth every cent. I was reluctant and waited
before buying one. But now I'm really glad I did. I wouldn't live w/o it
now. It makes listening a real pleasure and much less of chore. It makes
your noise level completely adjustable and really does work. Before I
bought one, I looked into other dsp software options etc, & noticed that all
the bad I had heard was from someone trying to sell me something else. You
won't regret buying the UT-106. IMHO

Ken



Dwayne May 15th 04 01:03 PM

In article ,
says...
Just got the Winradio WR-1550e at Dayton Hamvention. It's AWESOME!!!

George

What makes it so awesome? I am getting ready to head down to Dayton when
the weather clears a bit and still dont know what radios to get :/
--
-----------
Dwayne
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BC895/

Ken May 15th 04 06:24 PM

I'd like to hear from people that have both & have done a side by side
comparision.

"Dwayne" wrote in message
.net...
In article ,
says...
Just got the Winradio WR-1550e at Dayton Hamvention. It's AWESOME!!!

George

What makes it so awesome? I am getting ready to head down to Dayton when
the weather clears a bit and still dont know what radios to get :/
--
-----------
Dwayne
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BC895/




Steven Onines May 15th 04 08:32 PM

Hello George, Could you tell us a bit about how you found the Dayton
Hamvention this year? Was it worth going?
TX,
"George Blomfield" wrote in message
...
Just got the Winradio WR-1550e at Dayton Hamvention. It's AWESOME!!!

George



On Wed, 12 May 2004 02:58:53 GMT, "Ken" wrote:

Howdy Panzer, the UT-106 is worth every cent. I was reluctant and waited
before buying one. But now I'm really glad I did. I wouldn't live w/o

it
now. It makes listening a real pleasure and much less of chore. It

makes
your noise level completely adjustable and really does work. Before I
bought one, I looked into other dsp software options etc, & noticed that

all
the bad I had heard was from someone trying to sell me something else.

You
won't regret buying the UT-106. IMHO

Ken





Dwayne May 16th 04 12:59 AM

In article ,
says...
Hello George, Could you tell us a bit about how you found the Dayton
Hamvention this year? Was it worth going?

I'll tell you it was a waste of my time. Rained all freaking day long
and most of the outside vendors were closed. I walked around inside for
a little bit, picked up an R5 and left. One thing I can never understand
about hamfests is the smell of some of the people. Do these smelly guys
spend all there money on radios and cant afford soap?
--
-----------
Dwayne
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BC895/

George Blomfield May 16th 04 01:33 AM

On Sat, 15 May 2004 12:03:30 GMT, Dwayne wrote:

In article ,
says...
Just got the Winradio WR-1550e at Dayton Hamvention. It's AWESOME!!!

George

What makes it so awesome? I am getting ready to head down to Dayton when
the weather clears a bit and still dont know what radios to get :/
--


I don't know where to start... :-)

The software strikes you first: It looks and feels really
professionally crafted. Heaps of features, fantastic spectrum
analyzer, etc.

I have just downloaded a few of what they call "XRS plugins" from
http://xrs.winradio.com . Heaps of useful functions - for free.

The performance is excellent. The receiver is very sensitive, and a
fast scanner. The mechanical design is robust and elegant. Clear
concise user's manual, and the beautiful packaging is an absolute
overkill. So far, I got more than I expected. I'd give it 5 stars.

BTW I got myself the optional Advanced Digital Suite too,
it has many different analyzers and decoders, and I got a very good
package deal on it... ;-) It will take me some time to get through
all the functions, so far I tried the Advanced Signal Conditioner
which has heaps of graphically adjustable filters. IMHO this feature
alone is well worth the money, but there are many more...

Hope this helps.

George

PS Cold and rainy at Dayton today. Not much joy in the outdoors flee
market!


George Blomfield May 16th 04 01:49 AM

Today (Saturday) the weather was no good for the flee market, but
there is still enough to see indoors. I did my usual round around
Icom, Kenwood, Yaesu, AOR etc., which kept me entertained for most of
the day. I did not expect to end up spending most of the time at the
Winradio stand as they have some new things, like software-defined
shortwave radios etc., and good bargains on radios and antennas. I
got a deal on the WR-1550e with some optional software, and a very
nice discone antenna.

I did not originally plan to go on Sunday again, but if the weather
clears up I might still go to the flee market.

George


On Sat, 15 May 2004 19:32:51 GMT, "Steven Onines"
wrote:

Hello George, Could you tell us a bit about how you found the Dayton
Hamvention this year? Was it worth going?
TX,
"George Blomfield" wrote in message
...
Just got the Winradio WR-1550e at Dayton Hamvention. It's AWESOME!!!

George





George Blomfield May 16th 04 01:53 AM

On Sat, 15 May 2004 23:59:51 GMT, Dwayne wrote:

One thing I can never understand
about hamfests is the smell of some of the people. Do these smelly guys
spend all there money on radios and cant afford soap?
--


You do have a point, I saw quite a few really freakish characters
there today. I had to ask myself - do I really belong here? But then I
looked into the mirror and had to say - yes! :-)




Dan Morisseau May 16th 04 04:22 AM

In article ,=20
says...
One thing I can never understand=20
about hamfests is the smell of some of the people. Do these smelly guys=

=20
spend all there money on radios and cant afford soap?



=09Ahh, yes. Ham Radio: the roar of the static, the smell of the crowd!

--=20
MP 11.75, UPRR Jeff City Sub - N 38=B034'53", W 90=B022'32", 680'
"We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to=20
visit violence on those who would do us harm"

Ken May 16th 04 06:01 PM

I bought my PCR1000 new for 300, (that's half of what winradio wants for
1550), a new UT-106 for 125. That's a whole lot cheaper than Winradio. Is
Winradio REALLY That much Better? For the price? I'm not knocking it, just
curious? I've been thinking about buying another radio.

TIA


"George Blomfield" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 15 May 2004 12:03:30 GMT, Dwayne wrote:

In article ,
says...
Just got the Winradio WR-1550e at Dayton Hamvention. It's AWESOME!!!

George

What makes it so awesome? I am getting ready to head down to Dayton when
the weather clears a bit and still dont know what radios to get :/
--


I don't know where to start... :-)

The software strikes you first: It looks and feels really
professionally crafted. Heaps of features, fantastic spectrum
analyzer, etc.

I have just downloaded a few of what they call "XRS plugins" from
http://xrs.winradio.com . Heaps of useful functions - for free.

The performance is excellent. The receiver is very sensitive, and a
fast scanner. The mechanical design is robust and elegant. Clear
concise user's manual, and the beautiful packaging is an absolute
overkill. So far, I got more than I expected. I'd give it 5 stars.

BTW I got myself the optional Advanced Digital Suite too,
it has many different analyzers and decoders, and I got a very good
package deal on it... ;-) It will take me some time to get through
all the functions, so far I tried the Advanced Signal Conditioner
which has heaps of graphically adjustable filters. IMHO this feature
alone is well worth the money, but there are many more...

Hope this helps.

George

PS Cold and rainy at Dayton today. Not much joy in the outdoors flee
market!




Dwayne May 16th 04 06:07 PM

In article ,
says...
I bought my PCR1000 new for 300, (that's half of what winradio wants for
1550), a new UT-106 for 125. That's a whole lot cheaper than Winradio. Is
Winradio REALLY That much Better? For the price? I'm not knocking it, just
curious? I've been thinking about buying another radio.

TIA

I ended up not getting either of the radios because I just couldnt make
up my mind. I too would like to know if Winradio is worth the extra
bucks.
--
-----------
Dwayne
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BC895/

George Blomfield May 17th 04 04:41 AM

On Sun, 16 May 2004 17:01:31 GMT, "Ken" wrote:

I bought my PCR1000 new for 300, (that's half of what winradio wants for
1550), a new UT-106 for 125. That's a whole lot cheaper than Winradio. Is
Winradio REALLY That much Better? For the price? I'm not knocking it, just
curious? I've been thinking about buying another radio.


Yes, the 1550 is (IMHO) much better than the PCR, but please don't
take my word for it - try them both (as I did). As to the price
difference, well yes, I would not expect them to be the same price -
it's enough just to look closely at the quality of the mechanical
construction and the reason is already obvious there. Plus there is
more of course. I would not expect to buy a Ferrari for the price of a
Ford, even though a Ford would get me from A to B too - but who would
not prefer to drive a Ferrari... :-)

(That silly analogy might not be so silly after all - the 1550 scans
about 3 times faster than the PCR. And even faster with the Signal
Classifier function which is part of the Advanced Digital Suite...)

George



"George Blomfield" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 15 May 2004 12:03:30 GMT, Dwayne wrote:

In article ,
says...
Just got the Winradio WR-1550e at Dayton Hamvention. It's AWESOME!!!

George

What makes it so awesome? I am getting ready to head down to Dayton when
the weather clears a bit and still dont know what radios to get :/
--


I don't know where to start... :-)

The software strikes you first: It looks and feels really
professionally crafted. Heaps of features, fantastic spectrum
analyzer, etc.

I have just downloaded a few of what they call "XRS plugins" from
http://xrs.winradio.com . Heaps of useful functions - for free.

The performance is excellent. The receiver is very sensitive, and a
fast scanner. The mechanical design is robust and elegant. Clear
concise user's manual, and the beautiful packaging is an absolute
overkill. So far, I got more than I expected. I'd give it 5 stars.

BTW I got myself the optional Advanced Digital Suite too,
it has many different analyzers and decoders, and I got a very good
package deal on it... ;-) It will take me some time to get through
all the functions, so far I tried the Advanced Signal Conditioner
which has heaps of graphically adjustable filters. IMHO this feature
alone is well worth the money, but there are many more...

Hope this helps.

George

PS Cold and rainy at Dayton today. Not much joy in the outdoors flee
market!





Clay May 18th 04 01:05 AM


"George Blomfield" wrote in message
...
Yes, the 1550 is (IMHO) much better than the PCR, but please don't
take my word for it - try them both (as I did). As to the price
difference, well yes, I would not expect them to be the same price -
it's enough just to look closely at the quality of the mechanical
construction and the reason is already obvious there. Plus there is
more of course. I would not expect to buy a Ferrari for the price of a
Ford, even though a Ford would get me from A to B too - but who would
not prefer to drive a Ferrari... :-)


Yes, I've seen them both, both inside and outside. And I can't imagine what you
mean by 'quality of the mechanical construction' as being such a
differentiation.



David Clark May 21st 04 12:23 PM

On Tue, 18 May 2004 00:05:16 GMT, "Clay"
wrote:


"George Blomfield" wrote in message
...
Yes, the 1550 is (IMHO) much better than the PCR, but please don't
take my word for it - try them both (as I did). As to the price
difference, well yes, I would not expect them to be the same price -
it's enough just to look closely at the quality of the mechanical
construction and the reason is already obvious there. Plus there is
more of course. I would not expect to buy a Ferrari for the price of a
Ford, even though a Ford would get me from A to B too - but who would
not prefer to drive a Ferrari... :-)


Yes, I've seen them both, both inside and outside. And I can't imagine what you
mean by 'quality of the mechanical construction' as being such a
differentiation.


Well I can, actually, because I have both. The PCR case is made of
cheap folded sheet metal. When I bought it, it was already slightly
rusty inside. The WR1550e is housed in a beautiful, solidly made,
powder-coated aluminium extrusion. It does show that this manufacturer
has attention to detail.

In any case, I believe George does not make this his sole
differentiation - read his post carefully.

David



David Clark May 21st 04 12:25 PM

On Tue, 11 May 2004 14:48:53 GMT, Dwayne wrote:

In article 40a0dce2.11271848@news-server, says...
I do actually. :-) Your post did remind me that I planned to get rid
of it. I no longer use it. But I think I'd prefer to do it via eBay. I
am going away for a few days and will do it upon my return.

David

Why bother with ebay when it will just cost you money to place the add?
I can do paypal or postal money order if you like.


I'd rather pay the small placement fee, but maximize the profit. Of
course, if I can't sell it for more than $200 then I will come back to
you... :-)

David



Clay May 21st 04 02:25 PM


"David Clark" wrote in message
news:40ade539.2586268@news-server...
On Tue, 18 May 2004 00:05:16 GMT, "Clay"
wrote:


"George Blomfield" wrote in message
...
Yes, the 1550 is (IMHO) much better than the PCR, but please don't
take my word for it - try them both (as I did). As to the price
difference, well yes, I would not expect them to be the same price -
it's enough just to look closely at the quality of the mechanical
construction and the reason is already obvious there. Plus there is
more of course. I would not expect to buy a Ferrari for the price of a
Ford, even though a Ford would get me from A to B too - but who would
not prefer to drive a Ferrari... :-)


Yes, I've seen them both, both inside and outside. And I can't imagine what

you
mean by 'quality of the mechanical construction' as being such a
differentiation.


Well I can, actually, because I have both. The PCR case is made of
cheap folded sheet metal. When I bought it, it was already slightly
rusty inside. The WR1550e is housed in a beautiful, solidly made,
powder-coated aluminium extrusion. It does show that this manufacturer
has attention to detail.

In any case, I believe George does not make this his sole
differentiation - read his post carefully.

David



All it shows is that the manufacturer has access to the same boxes used by the
$20 12v-110v inverter makers that are also packaged in a 'beautiful solidly made
power coated aluminum extrusions'.

I do have to admit that those 'looks' helped a lot when I sold mine [while
keeping my pcr1000 that is 'beautifully compact' in its' custom designed case
and fits much better in my briefcase too...]

For me, the case wasn't worth 2x the price for indistinguishable differences in
performance.



Volker Tonn May 21st 04 04:33 PM



David Clark schrieb:

Well I can, actually, because I have both. The PCR case is made of
cheap folded sheet metal. When I bought it, it was already slightly
rusty inside. The WR1550e is housed in a beautiful, solidly made,
powder-coated aluminium extrusion. It does show that this manufacturer
has attention to detail.


Do you have any comparision how these things compete in pure receiving
skills on shortwave and on VHF-AIR, weather-sat receiving?
I do not(!) want to speak on the software capabilities :-)
I have the PCR1000 and I use 3rd party soft for decoding and the ICOM
soft for tuning and swwitching the PCR so far as some decoding progs do
not support remote control of the PCR1000.


JohnNDenver January 27th 05 08:15 AM

Wanted to buy used WR 1550E



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com