Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tim Jackson wrote: WG wrote: ... scanners are so poorly put together that they can really screw up the electronics in the aircraft just by turning it on. What a load of total crap! Aircraft avionics are, for obvious reasons, made to be very safe. This includes a high degree of resistance to stray RF interference. There are COUNTLESS devices on the ground that radiate FAR more RF interference into the sky than a handheld scanner would and yet we do not see planes falling out of the sky every time they get near a built-up area. Funny, I have several scanners and all of them radiate interference on aviation frequencies, depending on what frequency they are tuned to. I also have 5 VHF/UHF ham transceivers with wide band receive coverage and all of them also radiate interference on aviation frequencies - any receiver (with a few expensive exceptions) with an IF (a superhet) generates signals strong enough to be picked up by another sensitive receiver close by. Also, every FM broadcast receiver from a walkman to an expensive stereo also radiates on the civil aviation band. Try tuning a scanner to any frequency in the VHF aviation navigation band 108-118MHz, if you are near an airport you should be able to find a navigation signal. Then place an FM broadcast receiver nearby and slowly tune down from the top of the band - you should soon find a spot where you can interfere with and probably totally obliterate the navigation signal. Dave |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Advice on buying a scanner | Scanner | |||
Pro-95 Scanner | Scanner | |||
Coax signal deteriotion to Scanner | Scanner | |||
FS: scanner stuff | Scanner |