| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
December 10th 04, 07:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 06:19:49 GMT, Never anonymous Bud
wrote: Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, on Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:52:10 -0500 spoke: Court: Mom's Eavesdropping Violated Law SEATTLE (AP) - In a victory for rebellious teenagers, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a mother violated Washington's privacy law by eavesdropping on her daughter's phone conversation. That's bull****. It's the MOM'S phone, she can damn well listen to ANYONE talking on it! Sorry, but the law disagrees. It's not a queston of who owns the phone, it's a question of who has a reasonable expectation of privacy. By YOUR logic, the owner of a pay phone could record all your calls and broadcast them on the store's loudspeaker. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| VOODOO CB & ILLEGAL MODIFICATION BOOKS AT 40% OFF | CB | |||
| VOODOO CB & ILLEGAL MODIFICATION BOOKS AT 40% OFF | CB | |||
| very irronic: cell phone eavesdropping & old tv sets | Scanner | |||
| Freeband & Ham | CB | |||
Threaded Mode
