LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old January 7th 05, 05:58 AM
Dan Morisseau
 
Posts: n/a
Default

T-bone wrote:

I just don't think that discones should be dismissed as pure junk.
Within their limits, I've found them to be fine general all around signal
recievers, which is what their purpose is.


Agreed! You are absolutely right. George has been shilling Scantennas
for Antenna Warehouse for several years now. He belittles whatever else
anyone my recommend and refuses to acknowledge that another product may
suffice for another's purposes. His shamelessly partisan promotion gets
old after awhile.


--
Milepost 11.7 - UPRR Jeff City Sub - N 38°34'53", W 90°22'32", 680'
"We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to
visit violence on those who would do us harm"


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
discone or scantenna? redrum Antenna 8 January 12th 05 11:42 PM
Scantenna questions Tempest Scanner 6 September 30th 04 09:07 AM
Scantenna on 40-50 mhz RC Scanner 3 October 19th 03 01:57 PM
Antenna Question: Handheld's vs External Discone or Scantenna ? Robert11 Scanner 1 August 31st 03 01:27 AM
Scantenna Mounting issue Walter Scanner 5 August 30th 03 09:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017