Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
T-bone wrote:
I just don't think that discones should be dismissed as pure junk. Within their limits, I've found them to be fine general all around signal recievers, which is what their purpose is. Agreed! You are absolutely right. George has been shilling Scantennas for Antenna Warehouse for several years now. He belittles whatever else anyone my recommend and refuses to acknowledge that another product may suffice for another's purposes. His shamelessly partisan promotion gets old after awhile. -- Milepost 11.7 - UPRR Jeff City Sub - N 38°34'53", W 90°22'32", 680' "We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm" |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
discone or scantenna? | Antenna | |||
Scantenna questions | Scanner | |||
Scantenna on 40-50 mhz | Scanner | |||
Antenna Question: Handheld's vs External Discone or Scantenna ? | Scanner | |||
Scantenna Mounting issue | Scanner |