Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Careful, though...if you have a sensitive receiver, adding the amp could
actually reduce performance by overloading your receiver and possibly introduce intermodulation distortion depending on what stations are nearby. Since he won't be monitoring microwave frequencies, there are several choices of coax that would work quite well for a 50' run. In reality, there is some point where the advantage you gain with altitude is cancelled out by the loss in the coax. For a 50' run, you may be getting close to a wash, especially for UHF, unless you use better coax. It's difficult to make comparative measurements because you don't have antennas in both locations at once, but it sure would be nice to be able to do that. - Doug "Jim" wrote in message ... The best thing you can do is mount a bullet amp at the antenna. Even the best quality coax has a large loss at microwave frequencies. Use the type of amp meant for satellite television. Since you aren't transmitting you'll get by cheap. This will also allow you to use cheaper RG6. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Coax length - important ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Coax signal deteriotion to Scanner | Scanner | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |