Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bob wrote:
roward to decode." I was not suggesting it would not be labour intense. It could turn out to be a royal pain in the a$$, however, if it's simply inversion with a variable mixer freq, there's no real security there. The problem may be that the tick usually has nothing to do with the number of frequency changes. The inversion frequency may change several hundred times per minute, and the tick is just used to keep in sync. regards - Ralph -- Want to get in touch? http://www.radio-link.net/whereisralph.txt |