Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
there has to be some other modes that normal scanners wouldn't decode.
any thoughts? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Digital?
wrote in message ups.com... there has to be some other modes that normal scanners wouldn't decode. any thoughts? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:35:23 GMT, "Jim Hackett"
said in rec.radio.scanner: Digital? Most of what we call "digital" is NFM or SNFM. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:29:31 -0400, Al Klein wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:35:23 GMT, "Jim Hackett" said in rec.radio.scanner: Digital? Most of what we call "digital" is NFM or SNFM. Actually "Digital" is C4FM. -- Korbin Dallas The name was changed to protect the guilty. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 01:43:09 GMT, Korbin Dallas
said in rec.radio.scanner: On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:29:31 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:35:23 GMT, "Jim Hackett" said in rec.radio.scanner: Digital? Most of what we call "digital" is NFM or SNFM. Actually "Digital" is C4FM. And the modulation on the carrier is??? AM? PM?? FM?? What bandwidth is it? There's a difference between the process of putting information on the carrier and the format that information comes in. The OP was asking about the physical layer, as specified by "AM/FM ..." etc.. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:45:46 -0400, Al Klein wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 01:43:09 GMT, Korbin Dallas said in rec.radio.scanner: On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:29:31 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:35:23 GMT, "Jim Hackett" said in rec.radio.scanner: Digital? Most of what we call "digital" is NFM or SNFM. Actually "Digital" is C4FM. And the modulation on the carrier is??? AM? PM?? FM?? What bandwidth is it? There's a difference between the process of putting information on the carrier and the format that information comes in. The OP was asking about the physical layer, as specified by "AM/FM ..." etc.. The standard is APCO 25, which defines BW to be 6Khz and Modulation as C4FM. For more details see: http://www.apcointl.org/frequency/project25/ -- Korbin Dallas The name was changed to protect the guilty. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Sep 2005 21:18:12 -0700, wrote:
there has to be some other modes that normal scanners wouldn't decode. any thoughts? ISB, DSB ? DRM? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:39:59 GMT, (Peter Newman)
said in rec.radio.scanner: On 29 Sep 2005 21:18:12 -0700, wrote: there has to be some other modes that normal scanners wouldn't decode. any thoughts? ISB, DSB ? Any receiver that will receive SSB will also receive DSB, since both sidebands are the same. ISB too, but only 1 at a time. |