RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Scanner (https://www.radiobanter.com/scanner/)
-   -   Triband is better than dual band, right? (https://www.radiobanter.com/scanner/92715-triband-better-than-dual-band-right.html)

Romain Salad April 13th 06 04:12 AM

Triband is better than dual band, right?
 




Al Klein April 13th 06 05:04 AM

Triband is better than dual band, right?
 
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:12:29 -0600, "Romain Salad"
wrote:

Depends. If the 2 bands are 2 and 440 and the third band is 220 (and
there's no 220 activity in your area), not really.

Zombie Wolf April 14th 06 01:32 PM

Triband is better than dual band, right?
 
any antenna's usefullness will be based upon it's intended use. If you need
all three bands , and you are going to use them, then by all means, go for
the triband. Just be aware that the more bands the antenna covers, the more
sacrifices in performance on any one band have to be made in order for it to
function well. This is inherent in basic antenna design.

"Romain Salad" wrote in message
. ..







All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com