Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 13th 06, 12:09 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.

LOL!

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.

The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.

How does having a CW requirement prevent you from hooking a computer to a
rig? It don't. You don't want to modernize because you're stupid or lazy.
Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.

SC
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 13th 06, 12:12 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 114
Default CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS


Slow Code wrote:
LOL!

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.

The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.


and cw usage as well as test promtoes that sort of laziness

  #3   Report Post  
Old July 13th 06, 01:34 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS

On 12 Jul 2006 16:12:12 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.


The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.


and cw usage as well as test promtoes that sort of laziness


Nonsense. Having to do something promotes laziness? Then exercise
promotes sloth and dieting promotes obesity. By your "logic", that
is.
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 13th 06, 01:52 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 131
Default CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:09:17 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.


------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Naw, CW makes it too easy to communicate. CW is for lazy people. Real
hams want to struggle to copy signals through noise and QRM. That's
why they hate CW... it's no challenge!

Bill, W6WRT
  #5   Report Post  
Old July 13th 06, 11:34 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.

Bill Turner wrote in
:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:09:17 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.


------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Naw, CW makes it too easy to communicate. CW is for lazy people. Real
hams want to struggle to copy signals through noise and QRM. That's
why they hate CW... it's no challenge!

Bill, W6WRT



Or when a couple ops with amplifiers move in a little too close to your
on-going qso. That does make things tough, and then they laugh at you
when you politely ask them to move up the band a little. LOL





  #6   Report Post  
Old July 14th 06, 01:41 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.


Slow Code wrote:
LOL!

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.

The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.

How does having a CW requirement prevent you from hooking a computer to a
rig? It don't. You don't want to modernize because you're stupid or lazy.
Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.

SC


LOL! It started a long, long time ago.

When gasoline was 17 Cents a gallon, hams were complainining about how
hard it was to get to the FCC office and wanted a mail-order license.
The conditional was born.

It's been downhill ever since.

  #8   Report Post  
Old July 15th 06, 01:07 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 114
Default CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:



It's been downhill ever since.



I agree with that.

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.

in english please



SC

people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement

  #9   Report Post  
Old July 15th 06, 05:56 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.

On 14 Jul 2006 17:07:18 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:

Slow Code wrote:


Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.


in english please


Dumbing down has hurt ham radio.

people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement


Yep, you should. Try:

"People who live in glass houses should dress in the basement"

It's ironic justice that someone who posts a typo flame posts more
typos in his flame than the post he's flaming.
  #10   Report Post  
Old July 18th 06, 03:03 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 8
Default Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder

amateur radio is obsolete and nobody cares about it.

The ham frequencies should be auctioned to the highest bidder!



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
203 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (27-NOV-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 1 December 1st 04 05:09 AM
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 1 November 28th 04 01:46 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Policy 1 June 26th 04 02:07 AM
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 1 April 10th 04 06:59 PM
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 0 April 5th 04 05:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017