US Scheme Could Affect Global Communications
 

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Evasion noted.

So..do you believe "radiation belt remediation" is a good thing?

I believe in anything that will keep you Canucks downtrodden and destitute.

If a good belt whipping works, then so be it.

Evasion noted again.

HD/IBOC is evil because it messes up the AM band, but when the US
government wants to ruin short wave reception for the whole world, you
are completely ambivalent.

It appears you have no high moral ground from which to preach to David
Eduardo.

You are a complete, dishonest fraud.

Spare us your normal Canadian/Mexican/Japanese bashing tirade. It's worn
out.

Oh no it's not! It was just in for service last week and it's working fine.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

US Scheme Could Affect Global Communications
 

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:


So..do you believe "radiation belt remediation" is a good thing?

I believe in anything that will keep you Canucks downtrodden and destitute.

If a good belt whipping works, then so be it.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



You may want to re-think that, Steve.

Imagine, tens of thousands of downtrodden and destitute William
Shatners and Peter Jennings' pouring over the border to come live the
good life.



:::::**** shivers:::::

US Scheme Could Affect Global Communications
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

You may want to re-think that, Steve.

Imagine, tens of thousands of downtrodden and destitute William
Shatners and Peter Jennings' pouring over the border to come live the
good life.


I still haven't forgiven them for Brian Adams and Celine Dion.

US Scheme Could Affect Global Communications
 

Peter Jennings hated Ameica.Look it up.
cuhulin

US Scheme Could Affect Global Communications
 

"Licorice" wrote

A proposed US system to protect satellites from solar storms
or high-altitude nuclear detonations could cause side-effects
that lead to radio communication blackouts, according to new research.


As if a high-altitude nuclear detonation's "side-effects" would be so
benign.

Where do they come up with this Neo-Liberal ****?