New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

dxAce
Michigan
USA

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

dxAce
Michigan
USA


That certainly looks a bit of a beast . very nice
P

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)


When does this start shipping, and do you know the cost?

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

I suppose the model # is also the price...



"prozacian" wrote in message
...

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

dxAce
Michigan
USA


That certainly looks a bit of a beast . very nice
P

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

Jim Hackett wrote:
I suppose the model # is also the price...



That would be the ICOM way.





"prozacian" wrote in message
...
"dxAce" wrote in message
...
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

dxAce
Michigan
USA


That certainly looks a bit of a beast . very nice
P

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

Michael Lawson wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Jim Hackett wrote:
I suppose the model # is also the price...


That would be the ICOM way.

Hah. That would have made the R75 only a mere
$75. ;-)

--Mike L.


An oversight, I'm sure.

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

Holy cow. What do you think, $5000? $10000?

--Mike L.

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Jim Hackett wrote:
I suppose the model # is also the price...



That would be the ICOM way.

Hah. That would have made the R75 only a mere
$75. ;-)

--Mike L.

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

Whew! pretty awesome!
Guess what farmer Christmas will put in some lucky fella's stockings

But why, oh why, do Icom have to attenuate the MW band reception? - never
figured them out - they do that to all their radio's.
--
John Plimmer, Montagu, Western Cape Province, South Africa
South 33 d 47 m 32 s, East 20 d 07 m 32 s
RX Icom IC-756 PRO III with MW mods
Drake SW8 & ERGO software
Sony 7600D, GE SRIII, Redsun RP2100
BW XCR 30, Braun T1000, Sangean 818 & 803A.
GE circa 50's radiogram
Antenna's RF Systems DX 1 Pro, Datong AD-270
Kiwa MW Loop
http://www.dxing.info/about/dxers/plimmer.dx

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

dxAce
Michigan
USA

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

Michael Lawson wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Jim Hackett wrote:
I suppose the model # is also the price...


That would be the ICOM way.

Hah. That would have made the R75 only a mere
$75. ;-)

--Mike L.


An oversight, I'm sure.

Email from Universal after I inquired as to the price:

"Thanks for the email. We are aware of this new receiver but at this time
Icom has not released any information . We will post it on our website
as soon as we receive it. Sure looks like a nice one."

dxAce
Michigan
USA

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"John Plimmer" wrote in message
...
Whew! pretty awesome!
Guess what farmer Christmas will put in some lucky fella's stockings

But why, oh why, do Icom have to attenuate the MW band reception? - never
figured them out - they do that to all their radio's.



They do this to prevent front end overload for users in high MW
signal areas. There are some areas of the Windy, for instance, that are
a veritible RF 'Little Big Horn' of huge signals (50 kw).
It's not a problem for many users, but when it's a problem, it's
usually a big problem.

Padding the MW band is a lot easier and a lot less expensive than
increasing the headroom to accomodate signals 100 times or more hotter
than the average DX signal.




Do you suppose there will be a mod possible to defeat this unfortunate
design "benefit?"
--


There usually is. Most of the time as simple as jumping a pad.

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

Except in the case of the R-75. A bit more complicated...




"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"John Plimmer" wrote in message
...
Whew! pretty awesome!
Guess what farmer Christmas will put in some lucky fella's stockings

But why, oh why, do Icom have to attenuate the MW band reception? -
never
figured them out - they do that to all their radio's.



They do this to prevent front end overload for users in high MW
signal areas. There are some areas of the Windy, for instance, that are
a veritible RF 'Little Big Horn' of huge signals (50 kw).
It's not a problem for many users, but when it's a problem, it's
usually a big problem.

Padding the MW band is a lot easier and a lot less expensive than
increasing the headroom to accomodate signals 100 times or more hotter
than the average DX signal.




Do you suppose there will be a mod possible to defeat this unfortunate
design "benefit?"
--


There usually is. Most of the time as simple as jumping a pad.

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

Geez I might get divorced over this one!

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
And I'm certain you'll pay a respectable price as well. My guesstimate of
the
price is $4500 (or more!).

dxAce
Michigan
USA

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

Brian Denley wrote:
Geez I might get divorced over this one!

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
And I'm certain you'll pay a respectable price as well. My guesstimate of
the
price is $4500 (or more!).

dxAce
Michigan
USA



BD,

Oh Yeah, My Ex-Wife !

Now what was her name . . .

just for the fun of it :o) ~ RHF

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

Brian Denley wrote:
Geez I might get divorced over this one!

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html



Just be sure you get the divorce before you buy the receiver...assuming
you want to keep it.

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...

Brian Denley wrote:
Geez I might get divorced over this one!

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html



Just be sure you get the divorce before you buy the
receiver...assuming
you want to keep it.

Heh, I wonder if anyone has done a study of the
stuff that eBay sells to find out how much of it
comes from divorce proceedings...

--Mike L.

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

John Plimmer wrote:

Whew! pretty awesome!
Guess what farmer Christmas will put in some lucky fella's stockings


I would imagine it's far too cold for normal farming at the North Pole.
They most likely use the heat provided by the seemingly limitless coal
seam which has provided my stocking stuffings for the last decade.







mike

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:57:23 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



bpnjensen wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Email from Universal after I inquired as to the price:

"Thanks for the email. We are aware of this new receiver but at this time
Icom has not released any information . We will post it on our website
as soon as we receive it. Sure looks like a nice one."

dxAce
Michigan
USA

It'll be a nice one if the daggone sideband-selectable S-AM works as
advertised.

And I'm certain you'll pay a respectable price as well. My guesstimate of the
price is $4500 (or more!).

dxAce
Michigan
USA


Waaal, with the 7800 transceiver at $10,000 plus, $4500 sounds
downright reasonable, and maybe a little low.

Does this puppy have selectable roofing filters?

bob
k5qwg

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

I'm not a fan of wide bandwidth receivers as the design usually favors
the higher end communication bands and scanning functions.

Looks like they paid more attention to the front end then normal with
RF relay switching and (relatively) large toroid coils instead of
smaller chip inductors that can more easily saturate. Although the
toroids are self shielding they look a little to close together on that
BPF board for my tastes and causes me to wonder if enough attention was
paid to isolating the sections. I'd need a closer view of the board and
layout to know what was up with it.

The relays are a better RF solution than switching diodes but the unit
will be making clicking sounds when you scan across bands and wear the
relays out so I expect that the operating manual will advise against
doing that.

At 70 watts whether it is on or off means it will run hot. The case
looks like it is meant to travel and sit on a desk but you may want it
to be in a rack with cooling. To get a feel about this imagine placing
a 70 watt bulb inside the case. The receivers I have take 30 to 40
watts and are ballpark around the same size so for the ICOM to stay as
cool it will all depend on that fan in the back, which will collect
dust over time.

With the USB and ethernat ports on the back means it could be controled
with National Instruments software instead of generating computer
control software from scratch. ICOM may even have a driver written for
it.

Nice looking unit and display. Looks like it belongs on a lab bench.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

Remember the Red River Valley and the Cowboy who loved you so true.The
Grapes of Wrath movie has just now wound up,untill next time.
cuhulin

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dxAce wrote:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

I'm not a fan of wide bandwidth receivers as the design usually favors
the higher end communication bands and scanning functions.

Looks like they paid more attention to the front end then normal with
RF relay switching and (relatively) large toroid coils instead of
smaller chip inductors that can more easily saturate. Although the
toroids are self shielding they look a little to close together on that
BPF board for my tastes and causes me to wonder if enough attention was
paid to isolating the sections. I'd need a closer view of the board and
layout to know what was up with it.

The spacing looks tight, but this is the kind of thing that is easily
tested on a network analyzer in the design phase, so I suspect it is
not significant, and of course, any problems would have shown up in the
end to end testing of the radio.


The relays are a better RF solution than switching diodes but the unit
will be making clicking sounds when you scan across bands and wear the
relays out so I expect that the operating manual will advise against
doing that.

At 70 watts whether it is on or off means it will run hot. The case
looks like it is meant to travel and sit on a desk but you may want it
to be in a rack with cooling. To get a feel about this imagine placing
a 70 watt bulb inside the case. The receivers I have take 30 to 40
watts and are ballpark around the same size so for the ICOM to stay as
cool it will all depend on that fan in the back, which will collect
dust over time.

Even the R-8500, with the external power supply, needs ventilation. At
it is in the 30 watt category.


With the USB and ethernat ports on the back means it could be controled
with National Instruments software instead of generating computer
control software from scratch. ICOM may even have a driver written for
it.

Nice looking unit and display. Looks like it belongs on a lab bench.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

dxAce wrote:
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I don't see a S-AM button on it anywhere. I bet it won't come with a
sync circuit.

I wonder if that front-firing speaker will be worth a damn?

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

mike0219116 wrote:

dxAce wrote:
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I don't see a S-AM button on it anywhere. I bet it won't come with a
sync circuit.

Had you actually taken the time to read the specs you'd know that it does
apparently come with a sync circuit.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

mike0219116 wrote:

dxAce wrote:
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I don't see a S-AM button on it anywhere. I bet it won't come with a
sync circuit.

Had you actually taken the time to read the specs you'd know that it does
apparently come with a sync circuit.

AM sync is not the specifications on the web page, which is a copy of
the last page (4) of the brochure but there is a paragraph about it on
the brochure page 3 upper right. Since it is implemented in DSP I would
expect that it is sideband selectable but that is an assumption on my
part. The specification page missing S-AM must be an oversight.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

mike0219116 wrote:

dxAce wrote:
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I don't see a S-AM button on it anywhere. I bet it won't come with a
sync circuit.

Had you actually taken the time to read the specs you'd know that it does
apparently come with a sync circuit.

AM sync is not the specifications on the web page, which is a copy of
the last page (4) of the brochure but there is a paragraph about it on
the brochure page 3 upper right. Since it is implemented in DSP I would
expect that it is sideband selectable but that is an assumption on my
part. The specification page missing S-AM must be an oversight.

The paragraph says it's sideband selectable, does it not?

"In addition, upper or lower side for S-AM demodulation is selectable for
eliminating interference from adjacent strong signals."

dxAce
Michigan
USA

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

mike0219116 wrote:

dxAce wrote:
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I don't see a S-AM button on it anywhere. I bet it won't come with a
sync circuit.

Had you actually taken the time to read the specs you'd know that it does
apparently come with a sync circuit.

AM sync is not the specifications on the web page, which is a copy of
the last page (4) of the brochure but there is a paragraph about it on
the brochure page 3 upper right. Since it is implemented in DSP I would
expect that it is sideband selectable but that is an assumption on my
part. The specification page missing S-AM must be an oversight.

The paragraph says it's sideband selectable, does it not?

"In addition, upper or lower side for S-AM demodulation is selectable for
eliminating interference from adjacent strong signals."

Yes, the last sentence does. I should have re-read it before posting.
Anyway since the sync is in DSP it would be expected to have this
functionality.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

New ICOM? IC-R9500
 

dxAce wrote:
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/icom_r9500.pdf

and at:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
(via Bernt-Ivan Holmberg, Möklinta, Sweden, dx_india)

dxAce
Michigan
USA


What a piece of junk !