![]() |
NRD-630
Brian Denley wrote:
Peter: Did you two win the lottery or something? These $10,000 radios are too rich for my blood (or at least my marriage)! Well, what else am I going to spend my money on? Better than drugs or prostitution. At my age, anyway. |
NRD-630
Brian Denley wrote: Peter: Did you two win the lottery or something? These $10,000 radios are too rich for my blood (or at least my marriage)! I don't plan on purchasing, but I am interested, as always, in seeing what is being offered in the way of new SW receivers. Would be nice to win the lottery though! dxAce Michigan USA Drake R7, R8, R8A and R8B |
NRD-630
dx(FMLAO)Ace wrote:
Brian Denley wrote: Peter: Did you two win the lottery or something? These $10,000 radios are too rich for my blood (or at least my marriage)! I don't plan on purchasing, but I am interested, as always, in seeing what is being offered in the way of new SW receivers. Would be nice to win the lottery though! Hey..don't worry. Another large insurance settlement is sure to come your way soon. You must be getting very efficient at collecting by now. Why do you support Ionospheric Remediation by the US military? mike |
NRD-630
m II wrote: dx(FMLAO)Ace wrote: Brian Denley wrote: Peter: Did you two win the lottery or something? These $10,000 radios are too rich for my blood (or at least my marriage)! I don't plan on purchasing, but I am interested, as always, in seeing what is being offered in the way of new SW receivers. Would be nice to win the lottery though! Hey..don't worry. I try not to.. Another large insurance settlement is sure to come your way soon. Another? Wow! But since the first one is merely a fabrication of your whacked out Canucky mind I'm not getting my hopes up. You must be getting very efficient at collecting by now. QSL's? Yeah, I've got a fair enough collection. How about you? Why do you support Ionospheric Remediation by the US military? I don't know about that, but I certainly support the stomping on of dumbass Canucks by the US military. dxAce Michigan USA |
NRD-630
dx(FMLAO)Ace wrote:
Why do you support Ionospheric Remediation by the US military? I don't know about that, but I certainly support the stomping on of dumbass Canucks by the US military. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1938020.stm Canada can wait. There are DOZENS of countries with brown skinned people in them just waiting to be liberated to death by your super heroes.. However, at the rate Iraq is going it's going to take you few millennia to get around to us. How many Mexicans did you beat up last night? Is there blood on your axe handle? mike |
NRD-630
What's a Canadian? How did Canada get it's name? America is the Female
name of Americus Vespucie. cuhulin |
NRD-630
dxAce wrote: Seeing-I-dawg wrote: SDR-1000 http://www.flex-radio.com/About.aspx LSB, USB, AM, FMN, Sync AM, CW, and DRM are supported. Receive 12KHz-60MHz (Requires external user supplied pre selector for best operation below 160M) see: http://sdr-1000.blogspot.com/2006/09...w1vlf-low.html http://sdr-1000.blogspot.com/2006/10...osure-for.html "This radio currently features receiver specs that out perform all three of the top "mega-priced" radios by Ten-Tec, Icom, and Yaseu." "3rd and 4th order harmonics are so much better than any other radio currently on the market." "+30 dBm IP3" "98 dB IMD DR3 @ 2 KHz" http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/4108 Full Manufacturer Specifications He http://www.flex-radio.com/Products.aspx?topic=sdr1k Personally, I have no interest in a 'radio' that requires a computer to operate. Me neither. Who wants their radio to be at the mercy of ****ty, goofy, virus-prone MicroSlop Windows? As far as I'm concerned, they've yet to make a truly reliable turn-key computer. I'd still like to see JRC resurrect the NRD-515, but with a synch detector, tunable notch, a decent NB, and good audio. To me that would be the perfect "consumer-grade" DX rig, especially with the 515's SUPERB ergonomics. |
NRD-630
HI all once again from ken in the UK,
After looking at the 'PDF' spec sheet I now think that the installed filters are in the second IF and not roofing filter as I first thought. I can only assume that the DSP will clean-up the filters in the third IF stage. I would have thought a radio of this calibre would have used 32 BIT DSP filtering throughout ( with the exception of the roofing filtering in the first IF stage ). Sounds an interesting radio though, can't wait to buy one ( but I will have to......hi ) All the very best to all, Ken, G4KIR. "Mark" wrote in message news:1161421043.802589@ftpsrv1... "dxAce" wrote in message ... The 'supplied bandwidths' mentioned by Universal certainly don't look like roofing filters but merely your run of the mill standard voice and CW filters, 6, 3, 2.7, 1, 0.5 and 0.3 kHz. Yes, that's why I wondered about the filters. The NRD-545 has lots of them, because they're in software really. From 10Hz to 10 kHz in 10 Hz steps! Mark. Auckland New Zealand. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com